Title: Immersion in the Storyworld:
1Immersion in the Storyworld
- Foregrounding and Backgrounding in Yapese
Narrative
2Two aims 1. To account for tense-aspect
alternations in Yapese narrative 2. To
synthesize two theoretical approaches
- Two approaches
- 1. Textlinguistics (Labov 1972, Dry 1983,1988,
1992, Fleischman 1990) - Uses naturalistic data
- Focuses on entire monologic texts
- Structuralist-functional
- How does the structure of the text affect the
form of the clause? - How does narrative work?
- 2. Discourse Processing (Zwaan Radvansky 1998,
Zwaan 2004) - Experimentalist uses constructed language data
to tightly control variables - Cognitivist
- How is the imagined world of the story
represented? - How does narrative work?
3Key Concepts from Textlinguistics
- Definition of a minimal narrative
- two clauses which are temporally ordered that
is, a change in their order will result in a
change in the temporal sequence of the original
semantic interpretation (Labov 1972 360)
4Foreground and Background
- Foregrounded or narrative
- clauses
- Iconic
- Sequential do not overlap
- Form the skeleton of the plotline
- Backgrounded, non-
- narrative or free clauses
- May be reordered
- May overlap the foregrounded clauses in time
- Describe temporally unordered qualities of
setting, characters, etc.
5- Foregrounding and backgrounding as a cline
- (Fleischman 1985, 1990, Givón 1987)
- Multiple levels of foregrounding backgrounding
in mesoamerican languages (Jones Jones 1979) - Tense-aspect as a marker of degrees of foreground
in multiple languages - Bafut (Bantu, NW Cameroon, Mfonyam 1994)
- Old French (Fleischman 1985, 1990)
- Tokelauan (Hooper 1998)
- Australian English (Engel Ritz 2000)
6Discourse Processing Approaches Theoretical
Insights
- The Situation Model framework
- (van Dijk Kintsch 1983, Johnson-Laird 1983,
Kintsch 1998, Zwaan and Radvansky 1998, Zwaan
2004) - Comprehenders keep track of a mental
representation of the world evoked by linguistic
input.
7Zwaan's (2004) Immersed Experiencer Framework
(IEF)
- Influenced by perceptual/experiential model of
language comprehension (e.g. Barsalou 1999) - comprehension is the vicarious experience of the
described events through the integration and
sequencing of traces from actual experience cued
by the linguistic input - (Zwaan 2004 38)
-
8Zwaan Radvansky's (1998) Five Situational
Dimensions
- Space
- Protagonist Object
- Time
- Causality
- Intentionality
9Time
- Iconic events are processed more easily than
events out of order. - (Ohtsuka Brewer 1992, van der Meer et al. 2002)
- IEF explanation We experience events in the
order in which they occur.
10Intentionality
- Events connected as goal-satisfaction chains are
more easily processed than events which are not
so connected. Uncompleted goals are more
accessible than completed goals. - (Rinck Bower 2004, Trabasso Suh 1993, Suh
Trabasso 1993, Albrecht Myers 1995, Lutz
Radvansky 1997, Radvansky Curiel 1998) - IEF explanation We put ourselves in the shoes of
the protagonist and draw on our experiences of
satisfying goals.
11Causality
- Events connected by chains of cause-and-effect
are more easily processed than those events which
are not connected in such a fashion. - (Duffy et al. 1990, Singer et al. 1992,
Hallordson Singer 2002) -
- IEF-style explanation Event grouping (á la Zacks
Tversky 2001) draws on experiences of causal
connection.
12Event types predicted to give rise to greater
immersion in the narrative world
- Iconic rather than non-iconic events
- Causally connected over non-causally connected
- Goal satisfaction chains over chains unconnected
by intentionality - (c.f. Zwaan 2004 for remarks in a similar spirit)
- Also, telic events are unmarked in narrative
context (Magliano Schleich 2000, Fleischman
1990)
13- Is there morphological evidence which supports
the discourse processing evidence? - Do more prominent events in narrative give rise
to a sense of a deeper vicarious experience?
14TMA marking in Yapese
- Independent Pronoun TMA Markers
- Gimeew bea marweel.
- du.ind prog work
- You (dual) are working.
- Pronoun precedes the TMA marker.
- Contrast singular/dual/plural number.
- Postverbal subject agreement is absent.
15TMA marking in Yapese
- Clitic pronoun TMA Markers
- Ka mu marweel gow.
- perfect 2.cl work du.agr
- You (dual) have worked.
- TMA marker precedes the pronoun.
- Contrast singular/plural number.
- Subject triggers postverbal agreement, which
preserves the dual/plural alternation neutralized
by the pronouns. - Undergo vowel change in the third person singular.
16(No Transcript)
17Labov's (1972) Model of Narrative Structure
- (Abstract)
- Orientation
- Complicating Action
- (Coda)
- Evaluation
18Orientation
- Habitual clauses which present characters in
terms of customary actions. - Take maa 'habitual' (IPTMA).
- Maruweel rook' ea maa lifith ea
- work 3.sg poss FM hbt weave idf
- qurwaech.
- hats
- His work is (habitually) weaving hats.
19Orientation
- Presentative clauses introduce characters
- Progressive clauses describe their current
actions - Strategy 1
- Baay l'agruw i scientist ...
- exist two NPC scientist
- There are two scientists ...
20Orientation
- Presentative clauses introduce characters
- Progressive clauses describe their current
actions - Strategy 1
- Tomm'oon ni ngea yib ea
- first/before subcl inc.3.sg come.3.sg.intr idf
- rea yakoq neam, ma qer ea yi
- sg storm dist.dmn then h.prx FM idfpro
- bea gachoworiy ea chugum
- prog gather.tns idf possessions
- Before that storm came, there, they were/are
gathering up possessions
21Orientation
- Presentative clauses introduce characters
- Progressive clauses describe their current
actions - Strategy 2
- Kaakaroom ni kaakaroom ea qimmoey
- long.time AdvP long.time FM non-pres.exist
- lagruw i maabgol
- two NPC marry.intr
- Once upon a time there was a married couple
22Orientation
- Presentative clauses introduce characters
- Progressive clauses describe their current
actions - Strategy 2
- Reeb ea rraan ma qeree
- one idf day then h.prx.FM
- qii faafeal ba guwchiig nga
- non-pres.3.sg.nom play.intr ref dolphin with
- ba gaaf i wul
- ref clsfr NPC feather
- One day, then, there, a dolphin was playing with
a feather
23Orientation
- Strategy 1 presentative baay, progressive bea
(IPTMA) - Strategy 2 non-present presentative qimmoey,
non-present qu (CPTMA) - Narrators may switch from strategy 1 to strategy
2 but not vice versa.
24Complicating Action Background Clauses
- States take stative ba (IPTMA) (or unmarked
stative verb) - Ba maal'aaf ea gi ni
- stat far.intr idf loc relpro
- baay ea maarket riy.
- exist idf market locpro
- The market is far. (Lit. The place where the
market exists is far.)
25Complicating Action Background Clauses
- Actions completed prior to current deictic center
- Take perfect ka (CPTMA)
- ... mea chöb lingaan ea rea n'ean neam ni
wan'uug ea ba booyoch, ma faqän gu changar nga
laang ma kea yib ea chigiy ko rea naqun neam nga
but' ... - ... then something over there made an explosive
sound, to my mind like a gunshot, and when I
looked up, the ceiling of that house had come
down toward the ground ...
26Complicating Action Background Clauses
- Events of lesser importance
- Events simultaneous to current deictic center
- Take qu 'non-present' (CPTMA)
27Complicating Action Background Clauses
- Ma qer ea qii paer
- then h.prx FM non-pres.3.sg.nom settle.intr
- nga qii soen naag fa
- inc non-pres.3.sg.nom wait tns def
- dalip i pagäl ni walaagean.
- three NPC boys relpro brothers.3.sg.poss
- Then there she settled into waiting for her
three brothers.
28- a. Mea qunguy ea tuug
- Then he clenched his fist,
- zero TMA
- b. nga qii foeleeg ko fa pi moongkii
- and started sizing up the monkeys. inceptive
non-present - c. Ma kii qunguy fa pi moongkii ea tuug
- And the monkeys had clenched their fists,
- perfect non-present
- d. nga qu ra foeleegeed ngaak'.
- and started sizing him up ...
- inceptive non-present
29Functions of qu 'non-present'
- 1. In the orientiation, to express actions prior
to the onset of the complicating action. - 2. Within the complicating action, to express
events of lesser importance. - 3. Within the complicating action, to express
events which are simultaneous to each other. - Analysis Qu sets up a secondary, comparative
deictic center. - Note that events on the second center are iconic
with respect to each other.
30Complicating Action
- Three strategies for marking narrative clauses.
31Zero marked clauses are iconically ordered and
take their reference point from the previous
zero-marked clause
- Mea yaen ba gayow.
- Then one of them left.
- Suul
- It returned
- ma kea feek boechii niig ni kea liiq
- and it had picked up a little fish that it had
killed. - Boechii niig ni ba m'uuth rachangalean.
- A little fish whose spikes are sharp.
- Qeree yib i rugöy ea rachangal riy ko fa rea
looth... - There, it came to poke the thorn there into the
eel ...
32Semantics of nga 'inceptive'
- Inceptive
- Nga gu waen nga maqut ...
- Im going to go to the taro patch ...
- Result of a cause
- ...ma kii yib ea maar ni ba geel ko fa rea
paapaaq rooraed nga kii yim. - ... and then a strong sickness came to their
father, and so he died. - Purpose or intent
- Ma qer ea yib fa gäl neam ea pagäl nga ra qabiich
gaed. - Then the two boys arrived, in order to eat."
33- Nga indexes causality and intentionality.
- It is predicted to occur at high points of
narrative action. - ... mea thurury nga luweed
- and he pushed her into the well
- ngea lumach
- so that she drowned
- ngea yim'.
- and she died.
34Narrative peaks are marked by ka qu 'perfect
non-present'
- Ma qer ea kii yaen i taay fa rea duug nga thiliin
fa gäl malangean ea yaam' - Here, he had come to put the basket between the
two gravestones - ma kii yoeg fa rea bug i thiin.
- and he had said the words.
- Mea qunguy qawochean
- He closed his eyes
- ma faqän i pithig
- and when he opened them
- ma kea sug fa rea duug magungaen.
- the basket had been filled with excrement.
35(No Transcript)
36- Iconicity, causality and intentionality
- (i) are found with more highly foregrounded
clauses - (ii) index the perception of real world events as
predicted by the IEF - Telicity unmarked default for narrative.
37- What about ka qu at the peak?
- Seems to run counter to IEF predictions
- non-present
- perfect
- "pragmatic reversal" (Fleischman 1990)
- Old French marker of narrative peak flouts
narrative conventions - Mesoamerican languages (Jones Jones 1979)
marker of peak is frequently identical to
high-focus background marker
38- Possible IEF-style explanation
- Ka qu and other "pragmatic reversal" indicators
of narrative peak index the "surprise" factor of
reportable narrative events
39Summary of Results
- IEF predictions are reflected in morphology
- IPTMA are most highly backgrounded
- "Pragmatic reversal" peak has a possible IEF
explanation but remains to be investigated
experimentally