Title: Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial eukaryotes
1Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial
eukaryotes
- Scott C. Dawson (CandeLab), Lee Douglas
(WelchLab), Matt Welch, W. Zac Cande - MCB, UC-Berkeley
2Specific Research Questions
- What are the evolutionary relationships of
kinesins? - How to classify orthologous kinesins in protists?
- Are there major protist only kinesin lineages?
- (note 7 last page in handout!!!!)
- Is there a taxonomic sampling bias?
- Will better taxon sampling improve trees?
- Does sampling improve our understanding of
kinesin evolution?
3(No Transcript)
4Insufficient taxonomic sampling affects
- Robustness of phylogenies (more severe with some
inference methods) - Number of groups/relationships among groups
- Signatures of groups/motifs
- Biological perspective on function
(distinguishing orthologs from paralogs)
5How to improve robustness of phylogenetic trees?
6Approach
- Use phylogenomic methods to mine partial and
completed eukaryotic genomes (mostly microbial) -
- Reconstruct kinesin evolutionary history using
various inference methods good for large-scale
phylogenies (e.g. Bayesian)
7Phylogenomic analysis of kinesins in diverse
eukaryotes
- 602 aligned motor domains
- 349 homologous positions (several datasets)
- NJ, quartet puzzling, bayesian inference (mb) on
subset of 475 taxa - Emphasized kinesins in unicellular eukaryotic
kingdoms - de-emphasized vertebrate/metazoans, and/or recent
duplications
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Familiar taxa represented in our analysis
- Metazoan mouse/human, fly, worm, fish
(Fugu/Danio), frog, tunicate (Ciona) - Fungi basidiomycetes ascomycetes (yeasts and
filamentous) microsporidians - Green Arabidopsis, Rice/Maize, Chlamydomonas
11(No Transcript)
12Phytophthora (oomycete), Thalassosira (diatom)
13Tetrahymena (ciliate) Toxoplasma,
Cryptosporidium, Plasmodium (apicomplexans)
14Other microbial eukaryotes used in this phylogeny
Chlamydomonas (green algae), Entamoeba,
Dictyostelium, Leishmania, Trypanosoma
(Trypanosomes/Euglenozoa) Giardia (Diplomonads)
15N602
16What is structure of the kinesin tree?
17Bayesian Inference
- Advantages
- Fast and robust based on ML (likelihood)
- Can handle many more taxa than ML
- Can handle complex inference models
- Disadvantages
- need to specify posterior probabilities
- also need to make sure have run to saturation
(e.g. gt3 million reps for our trees)
18(No Transcript)
19Putative Kinesin Family Sister Groups
- BimC/Kip2/Cenp-E/Novel1/KHC
- Unc104/KRP85/95/Novel2
- Mklp/Cterm (several subgroups)
- MCAK/Kip3, Chromo, Nod, Novel3
- Several large unclassified groups
- This is somewhat different from previous trees
sampling? methodology?
20What is the relationship between phylogenetic
depth and nomenclature?Ex Mklp1/Cho1/N-6BimC
Motif Novel Families
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Motifs tend to break down at greater
phylogenetic depths
24Novel trypanosome kinesin family
C
B
A
Unc104
KRP85/95
25How to define and name novel groups and/or new
sequences?
- Names of existing groups
- Names of novel/future groups
- Classification of new sequences
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Criteria for candidate kinesin groups
- Robust phylogeny using full-length motor domain
- Strong support (gt70 is strong for this level)
- Monophyletic (common ancestor all decendants)
- At least 2 members of gt1 higher-level group
(genus level or higher)
29Candidate
Candidate
Not candidate
Includes all decendants
Candidate
30Monophyletic Mklp/Cho1/N-6 common ancestor plus
all decendants facilitates classification of
future sequences/ determination of orthology
31Kinesin nomenclature for the new millennium
- Monophyletic or natural (genotypic) groups should
trump functional (phenotypic) groups - Avoid paraphyletic groups (KinI)
- Need to standardize wide variations in
phylogenetic depth (avoid shallow groupings) - Avoid taxa-specific nomenclature
- Names of superfamilies?
- Test functional hypotheses little information on
function on orthologs in diverse eukaryotes