Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial eukaryotes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial eukaryotes

Description:

What are the evolutionary relationships of kinesins? ... Metazoan: mouse/human, fly, worm, fish (Fugu/Danio), frog, tunicate (Ciona) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: scottd78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial eukaryotes


1
Novel kinesin families in diverse microbial
eukaryotes
  • Scott C. Dawson (CandeLab), Lee Douglas
    (WelchLab), Matt Welch, W. Zac Cande
  • MCB, UC-Berkeley

2
Specific Research Questions
  • What are the evolutionary relationships of
    kinesins?
  • How to classify orthologous kinesins in protists?
  • Are there major protist only kinesin lineages?
  • (note 7 last page in handout!!!!)
  • Is there a taxonomic sampling bias?
  • Will better taxon sampling improve trees?
  • Does sampling improve our understanding of
    kinesin evolution?

3
(No Transcript)
4
Insufficient taxonomic sampling affects
  • Robustness of phylogenies (more severe with some
    inference methods)
  • Number of groups/relationships among groups
  • Signatures of groups/motifs
  • Biological perspective on function
    (distinguishing orthologs from paralogs)

5
How to improve robustness of phylogenetic trees?
6
Approach
  • Use phylogenomic methods to mine partial and
    completed eukaryotic genomes (mostly microbial)
  • Reconstruct kinesin evolutionary history using
    various inference methods good for large-scale
    phylogenies (e.g. Bayesian)

7
Phylogenomic analysis of kinesins in diverse
eukaryotes
  • 602 aligned motor domains
  • 349 homologous positions (several datasets)
  • NJ, quartet puzzling, bayesian inference (mb) on
    subset of 475 taxa
  • Emphasized kinesins in unicellular eukaryotic
    kingdoms
  • de-emphasized vertebrate/metazoans, and/or recent
    duplications

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Familiar taxa represented in our analysis
  • Metazoan mouse/human, fly, worm, fish
    (Fugu/Danio), frog, tunicate (Ciona)
  • Fungi basidiomycetes ascomycetes (yeasts and
    filamentous) microsporidians
  • Green Arabidopsis, Rice/Maize, Chlamydomonas

11
(No Transcript)
12
Phytophthora (oomycete), Thalassosira (diatom)
13
Tetrahymena (ciliate) Toxoplasma,
Cryptosporidium, Plasmodium (apicomplexans)
14
Other microbial eukaryotes used in this phylogeny
Chlamydomonas (green algae), Entamoeba,
Dictyostelium, Leishmania, Trypanosoma
(Trypanosomes/Euglenozoa) Giardia (Diplomonads)
15
N602
16
What is structure of the kinesin tree?
17
Bayesian Inference
  • Advantages
  • Fast and robust based on ML (likelihood)
  • Can handle many more taxa than ML
  • Can handle complex inference models
  • Disadvantages
  • need to specify posterior probabilities
  • also need to make sure have run to saturation
    (e.g. gt3 million reps for our trees)

18
(No Transcript)
19
Putative Kinesin Family Sister Groups
  • BimC/Kip2/Cenp-E/Novel1/KHC
  • Unc104/KRP85/95/Novel2
  • Mklp/Cterm (several subgroups)
  • MCAK/Kip3, Chromo, Nod, Novel3
  • Several large unclassified groups
  • This is somewhat different from previous trees
    sampling? methodology?

20
What is the relationship between phylogenetic
depth and nomenclature?Ex Mklp1/Cho1/N-6BimC
Motif Novel Families
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Motifs tend to break down at greater
phylogenetic depths
24
Novel trypanosome kinesin family
C
B
A
Unc104
KRP85/95
25
How to define and name novel groups and/or new
sequences?
  • Names of existing groups
  • Names of novel/future groups
  • Classification of new sequences

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Criteria for candidate kinesin groups
  • Robust phylogeny using full-length motor domain
  • Strong support (gt70 is strong for this level)
  • Monophyletic (common ancestor all decendants)
  • At least 2 members of gt1 higher-level group
    (genus level or higher)

29
Candidate
Candidate
Not candidate
Includes all decendants
Candidate
30
Monophyletic Mklp/Cho1/N-6 common ancestor plus
all decendants facilitates classification of
future sequences/ determination of orthology
31
Kinesin nomenclature for the new millennium
  • Monophyletic or natural (genotypic) groups should
    trump functional (phenotypic) groups
  • Avoid paraphyletic groups (KinI)
  • Need to standardize wide variations in
    phylogenetic depth (avoid shallow groupings)
  • Avoid taxa-specific nomenclature
  • Names of superfamilies?
  • Test functional hypotheses little information on
    function on orthologs in diverse eukaryotes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com