Space Optimization M6 and Demolition M5 Initiatives

1
Space Optimization (M-6) and Demolition (M-5)
Initiatives
Geri Hart AF/A7CA (temporary) Waltrina
Davis ACC/A7PD
2
2008 CE Strategic Plan

• Supports AF Defense Installation Support
  strategic plans

1. Improve CE Warfighter Support
Capabilities 2. Build our Total Force CE
Team 3. Reduce cost of Installation Support
1. Win Todays Fight 2. Take Care of our
People 3. Prepare for Tomorrows Challenges
CE
AF
1. Right size and place 2. Right
quality 3. Right Risk 4. Right
resources 5. Right mgt practices 6.
Right workforce
OSD
CE priorities in lock step with AF priorities
3
36 Commissioned Initiatives
Integrated into 2008 CE Strategic Plan (Strat
Plan Sub-objectives in yellow)
3
3
4
How the Transformation Initiatives Fit
in our Strategic Plan

• Integrates CE Transformation with CE Strategic
  Plan
• Each commissioned initiative supports a CE goal

Goal 3 20/20 x 2020 Offset the reduction in
funds available for installation support
activities by achieving efficiencies reducing
by 20 the AF physical plant that requires funds,
by 2020
Obj 3.3 Reduce by 20 the amount of AF physical
plant that requires funds, by 2020
Sub Obj 3.3D Research and review standard,
processes, techniques, and tools to optimize Air
Force facility space used by Oct 08 (Project M-6)
Implementation Plan Objective Champion to
develop plan/ build team to implement
sub-objective 3.3D
5
Space Data Analysis
6
Top Observations

• 1. Industry Standards Two Industry standard
  methods proposed for space management are Open
  Standards Consortium for Real Estate (OSCRE) and
  BOMA/IFMA
• 2. Admin Standards Standards are needed for
  useable space, rentable space and rank based
  standards
• 3. KPIs Space Utilization, Cost to Operate,
  Building Efficiency

7
1.0 Industry Standards
B240 SW Wing Tinker AFB
CURRENT STATE
ACES-RP Data Category Code
FUTURE STATE
ACES-RP Data Category Code
BOMA - Space Measurements and Prorating
OSCRE - Space Use Classifications
7
8
2.0 Space Standards

• Space Standards defined
• Usable
• Rentable
• Rank-Based

Usable includes office admin (office, business
support, classroom) GSA Average Usable standard
(200 usf/pp) and GSA Average Rentable standard
(230 rsf/pp)
8
9
Base Roll-ups

• Partial portfolio analysis
• Excess 13-24
• Comparison to GSA Average
• 200 USF/PP
• 230 RSF/PP

10
3.0 Key Performance Indicators

• Admin Space
• --Rentable SF/PP
• --Usable SF/PP
• --Cost/SF
• --Useable/Rentable
• Training space
• --Time
• --Seats Filled

11
M-6 Way Ahead

• Standards for Space and Occupancy (3 Oct)
• Define Space Allocation Process
• Establish new AF Standards for Admin Space
• Recommend Adopting BOMA/OSCRE methodology
• Define/Establish Key Performance Indicators
  (KPIs)
• Playbook outline and Leadership views (Feb 09)
• How to guide for bases --SharePoint data
  templates
• Modify Companion Regulations (AFH 32-1084, AFI
  32-9002, etc)
• Schedule and detailed outline for implementation
• Targeted Training (Symposium March 09, AFIT)
• Next Portfolio priorities
• Warehousing, Ops and Training

12
How the M-5 Transformation Initiative
Fits in our Strategic Plan

• Integrates CE Transformation with CE Strategic
  Plan
• Each commissioned initiative supports a CE goal

Goal 3 20/20 x 2020 Offset the reduction in
funds available for installation support
activities by achieving efficiencies reducing
by 20 the AF physical plant that requires funds,
by 2020
Obj 3.3 Reduce by 20 the amount of AF physical
plant that requires funds, by 2020
Sub Obj 3.3C Create AF policy comprehensive
program which achieves maximum return on
investment for demolition decisions by Oct 08
(Project M-5)
Implementation Plan Objective Champion to
develop plan/ build team to implement
sub-objective 3.3C
13
20 Reduction Target
Baseline Footprint 431 MSF (as of 30 Sep 06)
13
14
AF Demolition Policy

• Air Staff, MAJCOM and installation roles and
  responsibilities
• How to identify demolition opportunities
• Pre-demolition checklist
• Salvage/Reuse/Recycling opportunities
• MAJCOM/Regional IDIQ strategic sourcing
  opportunity
• Demolition incentive (Golden Hammer Award)
• Demolition Prioritization Indicator (DPI)
• Key performance indicators (KPIs)

14
15
Challenges

• Magnitude of footprint reductions
• Uncertainties in funding outlook
• Future budget reductions
• Difficulty in POMing for demolition funds
• Good news received FY09 funds to support
  demolition projects
• Other funding sources Energy initiative, EOY
  funding, etc
• OSD FY08-13 Disposal Goals
• Facilities 15MSF (2.5MSF/yr)
• Non-facilities - 868M PRV (145M/yr)
• Impact of joint basing

15
16
M-5 Way Ahead

• Oct 08 AF/A7C sign out policy letter
• Nov 08 Collect FY08 demolition data
• Nov Dec 08 Complete playbook
• Jan Jun 09 Re-Evaluate process
• Jun Aug 09 Modify policy as needed

17
Questions?
17
17