ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY STUDIES FOR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY STUDIES FOR

Description:

The simulations are then performed using Merlin. Using Merlin we are able to apply a random set of misalignments to a particular ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Xont
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY STUDIES FOR


1
  • ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY STUDIES FOR
  • THE ILC DAMPING RINGS
  • Kosmas Gr. Panagiotidis

The Cockcroft Institute
2
Contents
  • Overview of the ILC
  • Luminosity and Emittance
  • Generation of Emittance in a Storage Ring
  • Sensitivity Studies
  • Future Work

3
The International Linear Collider
30km
Figure 1Schematic layout of ILC
  • The International Linear Collider (ILC) is a
    proposed facility for future studies of
    fundamental particle physics.
  • ILC will be designed to collide electrons and
    positrons at centre of mass energies of 500GeV or
    more, in order to make precision measurements of
    new phenomena, such as the Higgs boson and
    supersymmetry.
  • The baseline configuration of the ILC1 has been
    determined by the Global Design Effort.

4
Luminosity
  • A fixed target has a high density of target
    particles, resulting in a good probability for
    interaction. Therefore, the intensity and
    emittance of the incident beam are not usually a
    major concern in fixed target experiments. In
    contrast, the density of a colliding beam target
    is extremely small compared to that of a solid
    target.
  • The luminosity of a collider is determined by the
    density of the colliding bunches and the
    collision rate. For a linear collider concerning
    two colliding bunches of particles n1 and n2
    colliding at a repetition rate f, the luminosity
    is given by
  • where sx and sy are the horizontal and
    vertical beam sizes.
  • Practical issues limit the charge per bunch and
    the repetition rate. Therefore, to enhance
    luminosity, one needs to reduce the beam sizes
    (and hence the emittances) as much as possible.

5
Emittance
Figure 2 Phase-space ellipse
  • The emittance is a measure of the phase space
    area (the area on a plot of momentum vs
    coordinate) occupied by particles in the beam,
    and is invariant in the absence of effects like
    radiation and acceleration.
  • Thus, to get a small beam size at the IP, we need
    both very strong focusing (which is provided by
    the final focus magnets) and a very small
    emittance.
  • The job of the damping rings is to use radiation
    effects to produce a beam with very small
    emittance.  The lowest emittance ever achieved in
    a storage ring is 4.5 pm to produce the design
    luminosity, the damping rings have to achieve a
    vertical emittance of 2 pm.

6
The ILC Damping Rings
  • The two damping rings (one for the electron beam
    and one for the positron beam), situated
    coaxially around the Interaction Point (IP), form
    a major component of the ILC.
  • Their purpose is to reduce the emittance of the
    beam, since, when created, neither the electron
    nor the positron bunches are compact enough to
    yield the high luminosity essential for the
    physics programme.

Figure 3 Footprint of ILC positron ring and
important parameters
7
Types of Magnets used in the Damping Ring
  • Dipole Magnets
  • They are used to bend the beam.
  • Quadrupole Magnets
  • Their purpose is to focus the beam.
  • Sextupole Magnets
  • They are used to correct the chromaticity.

8
Particle Trajectory and Steering Errors
Dipole field error
Closed Orbit
Reference Trajectory
Figure 4 Illustration of a dipole field error
  • A dipole field error causes a distortion of the
    closed orbit and particles crossing the field
    error region get a vertical kick, as
    illustrated in figure 4.
  • Depending on the sensitivity of the particular
    lattice, even a small error can lead to a large
    orbit distortion and this in turn means that in
    order to achieve successful operation of the
    ring, the alignments tolerances of magnetic
    components become very demanding.

9
Generation of emittance in a storage ring
  • In storage ring operation the vertical emittance
    is typically dominated by magnet misalignments.
  • Betatron coupling results in direct transfer of
    horizontal emittance into the vertical plane.
  • The distortion on the closed orbit, resulting
    from this steering together with vertical
    sextupole misalignments, leads to a vertical beam
    offset in the sextupoles with respect to their
    magnetic center. Consequently, betatron coupling
    is introduced .
  • Vertical misalignments in the sextupoles
    introduce a vertical kick to the beam that is
    dependent on the horizontal coordinate. This
    leads to each particle experiencing a different
    force in respect to their horizontal position in
    the bunch and consequently this also leads to
    vertical emittance growth.
  • Rotations of quadrupoles around the beam axis
    have a similar effect to vertical misalignments
    of the sextupoles.


10
Simulation Codes
  • The studies presented here were performed using
    specialized codes for the modeling of accelerator
    systems, namely MAD (Methodical Accelerator
    Design 2 (version 8.23dl), and Merlin 3.
  • The simulations run with the aforementioned codes
    investigated the effect of magnet misalignments
    on specific beam parameters, namely on the
    vertical closed orbit, the dispersion and the
    vertical emittance ey.
  • A definition file for the present baseline
    damping ring lattice, referred to as the OCS6
    lattice, is available in the standard format used
    by MAD. This file describes the sequence of all
    elements that comprise the ring, but cannot be
    read directly by Merlin. Instead, MAD is used to
    produce a file that contains a detailed
    description of the lattice in a simplified format
    that can be recognized by Merlin. The simulations
    are then performed using Merlin.
  • Using Merlin we are able to apply a random set of
    misalignments to a particular types of families
    of magnets and then calculate the effects of
    these misalignments on various properties of the
    beam.

11
Sensitivity of the yrms closed orbit to
Quadrupole misalignments
Figure 5
  • Figure 5 illustrates the closed orbit distortion
    for rms quadrupole vertical misalignments up to
    10µm. The blue points show the average over 100
    sets of errors with a given rms. The error bars
    indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles of each set
    of errors.

12
Sensitivity of the Vertical Emittance ey to
Quadrupole tilts
Figure 6
  • The above figure shows how the emittance is
    affected by quadrupole tilts (rotation of the
    magnet in respect to the reference trajectory).
    The error bars indicate the 5th and 95th
    percentiles of each set of errors

13
Sensitivity of the Vertical Emittance ey to
Sextupole misalignments
Figure 7
  • Figure 7 illustrates the effect of vertical
    sextupole misalignments to the vertical
    emittance The error bars indicate the 5th and
    95th percentiles of each set of errors.

14
Conclusions
  • The calculations based on the simulated data
    appear to be in reasonable agreement with theory
    and present acceptable errors.
  • The simulations predict very accurately the trend
    of the effect to the lattice sensitivity in
    respect to each misalignment error, as expected
    by the theoretical formulae each case. Knowing
    these trends provides a clear understanding of
    how the machine responds to the different types
    of errors that are always present in everyday
    operation.
  • A vertical emittance of 2pm (nominal
    specification for the ILC damping rings) is
    generated by vertical sextupole misalignments of
    the order of 60µm. An equal amount of vertical
    emittance is generated by quadrupole tilts of the
    order of 70 to 80µrad. It is unrealistic to
    expect that this level of precision can be
    achieved during commissioning of the machine.
    This effectively means that the machine will have
    to be tuned to the desired vertical emittance
    levels after construction and after successful
    beam circulation has been achieved.

15
Future Work
  • The performed simulations took into account only
    one type of error each time.
  • Of course, in reality all types of possible
    errors come into play simultaneously. To evaluate
    a simulation where all types of errors have been
    introduced into the model, one needs to be able
    to account for the effect of each type of error
    separately and that information is provided by
    the current studies.
  • The next step of these studies is to try and
    simulate a more realistic model of the damping
    ring lattice, where all types of misalignment
    errors are present and evaluate it based on the
    knowledge acquired so far.
  • Simulate the tuning procedure to achieve the
    necessary beam quality.

16
  • References
  • ILC Baseline Configuration Document,
    http//www.linearcollider.org/wiki/docu.php?idbcd
    bcd_home
  • http//mad.web.cern.ch/mad/
  • http//www.desy.de/merlin/
  • A.W.Chao, M.Tigner, Handbook of Accelerator
    Physics and Engineering, World Scientific
    Publishing (Jun 1999)
  • S.Y. Lee, Accelerator Physics, World Scientific
    Publishing 2Rev Ed edition (26 Jan 2005)
  • A.Wolski, J.Gao, S.Guiducci, Configuration
    Studies and Recommendations for the ILC Damping
    Rings, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
    February 4, 2006 , http//repositories.cdlib.org/l
    bnl/LBNL-59449
  • A.Wolski, Linear Dynamics for Particle
    Accelerators, The Cockcroft Institute, Autumn
    Lecture Courses 2006, http//www.cockcroft.ac.uk/e
    ducation.htm
  • A.Wolski, J.Jones, Damping Rings Design and
    Physics Issues, USPAS January 2007, Houston,
    Texas, http//www.cockcroft.ac.uk/education.htm
  • Hans Grote, F. Cristoph Iselin, The MAD Program,
    Users Reference Manual, CERN/SL/90-13 (AP) Rev.
    5, Geneva, Switzerland 1996

17
  • End of Presentation
  • Thank you for your attention !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com