Title: Predation (Chapter 18)
1Predation (Chapter 18)
- Predator-prey cycles
- Models of predation
- Functional vs. numeric responses
- Stability in predator-prey models
2Two big themes
- Predators can limit prey populations.
- This keeps populations below K.
3- Predator and prey populations increase and
decrease in regular cycles.
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6- A verbal model of predator-prey cycles
- Predators eat prey and reduce their numbers
- Predators go hungry and decline in number
- With fewer predators, prey survive better and
increase - Increasing prey populations allow predators to
increase - And repeat
7- Why dont predators increase at the same time as
the prey?
8- The Lotka-Volterra Model Assumptions
- Prey grow exponentially in the absence of
predators. - Predation is directly proportional to the product
of prey and predator abundances (random
encounters). - Predator populations grow based on the number of
prey. Death rates are independent of prey
abundance.
9- R prey population size (resource)
- P predator population size
- r exponential growth rate of the prey
- c capture efficiency of the predators
10removal of prey by predators
rate of change in the prey population
intrinsic growth rate of the prey
11- For the predators
- a efficiency with which prey are converted into
predators - d death rate of predators
death rate of predators
rate of change in the predator population
conversion of prey into new predators
12- Prey population reaches equilibrium when dR/dt
0 - equilibrium state of balance between opposing
forces - populations at equilibrium do not change
- Prey population stabilizes based on the size of
the predator population
13- Predator population reaches equilibrium when
dP/dt 0 - Predator population stabilizes based on the size
of the prey population
14- Isocline a line along which populations will
not change over time. - Predator numbers will stay constant if R d/ac
- Prey numbers will stay constant if P r/c.
15Predators are stable when Prey are stable
when
Number of Predators (P)
Number of prey (R)
16Prey are stable when
Prey Isocline
Number of Predators (P)
r/c
d/ac
Number of prey (R)
17Predators are stable when
Predator isocline
Number of Predators (P)
d/ac
Number of prey (R)
18equilibrium
Number of Predators (P)
r/c
d/ac
Number of prey (R)
19Predation (Chapter 18)
- Finish Lotka-Volterra model
- Functional vs. numeric responses
- Stability in predator-prey cycles
20Number of predators depends on the prey
population.
Predator isocline
Number of Predators (P)
Predators decrease
Predators increase
d/ac
Number of prey (R)
21Number of prey depends on the predator population.
Prey decrease
Prey Isocline
Number of Predators (P)
r/c
Prey increase
d/ac
Number of prey (R)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24- Changing the number of prey can cause 2 types of
responses - Functional response relationship between an
individual predators food consumption and the
density of prey - Numeric response change in the population of
predators in response to prey availability
25- Lotka-Volterra prey are consumed in direct
proportion to their availability (cRP term) - known as Type I functional response
- predators never satiate!
- no limit on the growth rate of predators!
26- Type II functional response consumption rate
increases at first, but eventually predators
satiate (upper limit on consumption rate)
27Type III functional response consumption rate
is low at low prey densities, increases, and then
reaches an upper limit
28- Why type III functional response?
- at low densities, prey may be able to hide, but
at higher densities hiding spaces fill up - predators may be more efficient at capturing more
common prey - predators may switch prey species as they become
more/less abundant
29(No Transcript)
30- Numeric response comes from
- Population growth
- (though most predator populations grow slowly)
- Immigration
- predator populations may be attracted to prey
outbreaks
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33- Predator-prey cycles can be unstable
- efficient predators can drive prey to extinction
- if the population moves away from the
equilibrium, there is no force pulling the
populations back to equilibrium - eventually random oscillations will drive one or
both species to extinction
34(No Transcript)
35- Factors promoting stability in predator-prey
relationships - Inefficient predators (prey escaping)
- less efficient predators (lower c) allow more
prey to survive - more living prey support more predators
- Outside factors limit populations
- higher d for predators
- lower r for prey
36- Alternative food sources for the predator
- less pressure on prey populations
- Refuges from predation at low prey densities
- prevents prey populations from falling too low
- Rapid numeric response of predators to changes
in prey population
37- Huffakers experiment on predator-prey
coexistence - 2 mite species, predator and prey
38- Initial experiments predators drove prey
extinct then went extinct themselves - Adding barriers to dispersal allowed predators
and prey to coexist.
39Refuges from predation allow predator and prey to
coexist.
40Prey population outbreaks
Population growth curve for logistic population
growth
Per capita population growth rate
ro
K
Density of prey population
41Type III functional response curve for predators
Per capita death rate
K
Density of prey population
42Multiple stable states are possible.
43- Below A birth rate gt death rate population
increases
A
44- Point A stable equilibrium population
increases below A and decreases above A
A
45- Between A B predators reduce population back
to A
A B
46- Unstable equilibrium equilibrium point from
which a population will move to a new, different
equilibrium if disturbed
47- Point B unstable equilibrium below B,
predation reduces population to A above B,
predators are less efficient, so population grows
to C
B
48- Between B C predators are less efficient,
prey increase up to C
B
49- Point C stable equilibrium
B
50- Predator-prey systems can have multiple stable
states - Reducing the number of predators can lead to an
outbreak of prey
51Growth rate
Death rate
52(No Transcript)