Systematic RNAimediated mRNA knockdown of a large - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Systematic RNAimediated mRNA knockdown of a large

Description:

Similar approach taken in yeast, nematode, insect and human. Challenge: Annotation of Genome Sequencing Data ... 76% of T. brucei genes are shared between. all ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: buddyu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Systematic RNAimediated mRNA knockdown of a large


1
Systematic RNAi-mediated mRNA knockdown of a
large subset of genes on T. brucei Chromosome 1.
Similar approach taken in yeast, nematode, insect
and human
2
Challenge Annotation of Genome Sequencing Data
Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi and
Leismania major Genomes recently sequenced (2005).
  • 76 of T. brucei genes are shared between
  • all three sequenced kinetoplastids.
  • Over half of predicted trypanosome ORFs have no
  • counterpart in higher eukaryotes.
  • 73 of trypanosome ORFs have unknown,
  • poorly predictable or unpredictable functions.
  • Only T. brucei has a robust RNAi pathway.
  • Well characterized Tet inducible RNAi expression.

3
Trypanosome Lifecycle
4
RNAi Overview
  • Method for ablation of specific mRNA
  • Depends on double-stranded RNA
  • Exogenous (transfected dsRNA)
  • Endogenous (DNA expression vector)

5
Strategy
  • Select genes for knock-down by RNAi
  • Produce gene-specific Tet inducible RNAi
    constructs
  • Transfect constructs into bloodstream form T.
    brucei
  • Score phenotype following RNAi induction
  • Growth and viability
  • Cell cycle progression
  • Endocytic and protein processing systems
  • Morphology and Motility
  • Post results on publicly accessible database
  • Rigorous quality control

6
Organization of Chromosome 1
7
Criteria Used to Select Genes for RNAi Knockdown
369 predicted ORFs on Chromosome 1 (8131 ORFs on
11 chromosomes)
  • Chose 197 ORFs for RNAi ablation
  • Excluded subtelomeric regions (300kb)
  • Gene clusters specific for Chromosome 1
  • Pan-specific RNAi targeting all members
  • Excluded multi-gene family members present
  • on other chromosomes
  • Excluded those that failed RNAit algorithm
    criteria
  • 2 gave no PCR product

8
RNAi Expression Constructs
Transfected into BF Lister 427 expressing TetR
and T7 Pol
  • Concerns
  • Leaky expression
  • Expression too low (not knocked-down enough)
  • Variable expression at different integration sites

9
Growth and Viability
  • Identical transfected cultures were seeded at
    1x106 cells/ml
  • one culture induced with 1µg/ml tetracycline
  • Cell number counted daily and cultures reseeded
    at
  • 1x106 cells/ml for up to 8 days.
  • Defect scored if density lt 75(mild) or
    50(severe) less than
  • uniduced culture.

10
Cell Cycle Progression
Microscopic assessment of nucleus and kinetoplast
number following DAPI staining. WT cells 85
1K1N, 10 2K1N, 5 2K2N Defect lt4 or
gt17 2K1N gt12 2N gt4.5 0N 0K Ngt2 Kgt2
11
Endocytic and Protein Processing Systems
  • Concanavalin A (ConA) reacts with VSG
    flagellar pocket,
  • endosomes and lysosomes.
  • Tomato Lectin glycoproteins
  • MitoTracker mitochondria
  • BODIPY-ceramide Golgi

12
Endocytic and Protein Processing Systems
TFN1.195
  • Defective ConA uptake
  • Phase-light vacuole

13
Data Summary
  • 33 showed significant phenotype.
  • 23 growth defect 16 cell cycle progression 6
    both.
  • Only one showed additional defects in endocytic
    pathway.
  • Visible defects in endocytic pathway and
    morphology almost
  • invariably associated with growth/cell cycle
    defects.
  • No evidence of functional clustering strand bias
    or positional
  • effects that correlate with knock-down phenotype.

14
Hows the current annotation?
47/120
Genes annotated as function inferred from
homology and conserved hypothetical are
generally accurate.
Genes annotated as hypothetical and
hypothetical, unlikely are less likely to
represent functional ORFs.
15
Are genes widely conserved between species
more likely to be essential for viability and
growth than genes conserved within a closely
related group?
  • Core functions versus life cycle-specific
    functions.
  • Appears to be the case in S. cerevisiae and S.
    pombe.

16
Are genes broadly conserved between species more
likely to be essential for viability and growth?
No statistically significant difference in T.
brucei.
17
Conclusions
  • 12 of knockdowns lethal further 11 growth
    inhibited.
  • 1,500 ORFs for robust growth in vitro.
  • No higher order genome organization associated
    with
  • knockdown phenotype.
  • No increased frequency of knockdown phenotype
  • associated with widely conserved genes.
  • Other genes may be essential under different
    conditions/
  • lifecycle stages.
  • Some may be missed due to technical issues.
  • Growth / cell cycle phenotypes are most robust
    and telling.
  • May be most useful for rapid screens.
  • New methods must be developed to determine
    functions of
  • those genes with inconclusive knockdown
    phenotypes.

18
Future Directions
  • Determine function/ biochemical activity of
    essential
  • proteins with unknown function.
  • High throughput localization.
  • Live-cell reporter strains (FP tagged organelles)
  • Continue analysis with ORFs on 10 remaining
    chromosomes.
  • High throughput analysis using RNAi barcodes.
  • Couples RNAi libraries with microarray analysis.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com