Poultry Education, Environmental Module - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Poultry Education, Environmental Module

Description:

Poultry Education, Environmental Module – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: mdsmolengl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poultry Education, Environmental Module


1
Oklahomas Outstanding Water Resources
2
(No Transcript)
3
Beef Cattle, dairy cattle, and poultry
production provides a major source of nutrients
to streams. US Geological Survey (Water Quality
in the Ozark Plateaus, 1992-95)
4
Poultry has brought many benefits to Eastern
Oklahoma
  • Improved economy, not just on farm
  • Support for the family farm- many could not farm
    otherwise
  • Increased soil fertility and productivity

5
The value of Poultry Industry
  • Direct employment 5337 jobs
  • Annual 72.8 million
  • Capital investment
  • companies 124 million
  • producers 256 million
  • OSU 1995

6
Butwithout good waterWhere would we be?
7
Environmental Concerns Associated with Poultry
Litter
  • Poultry Litter Management Training
  • 1998 - 1999

8
What caused the current issue to gain attention?
  • Lake Eucha study - Algae growth, taste odor in
    water supply
  • Lake Wister Study - Algae growth, taste odor in
    water supply
  • Illinois River Studies - recreational impact

9
Watersheds
  • Everyone lives in a watershed.
  • All land use (all activities) in the watershed
    affect water quality.
  • What watershed do you live in?

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
We all live in a watershed.
13
Animal Agriculture and the Environment
14
US Geologic Survey study of the Ozarks found
  • Higher nutrient concentrations in streams
  • Higher bacteria counts in streams
  • Higher nitrate concentration in ground water
  • Changes in fish community
  • Associated with agricultural land use
  • (or waste treatment plants)

15
Which Animals are the Worst?
  • Swine?
  • Cows?
  • Horses?
  • Sheep?
  • Chickens?
  • Ostriches?

16
Which Animals are the Worst?
  • Swine?
  • Cows?
  • Horses?
  • Sheep?
  • Chickens?
  • Ostriches?
  • NONE OF THE ABOVE ?

17
People are the Worst!
  • They pollute the water.
  • They pollute the air.
  • They damage habitats.
  • and most of the pollutants are the same!

18
What are the Environmental Concerns of Animal
Agriculture?Particularly the Poultry-Cattle
Combination
19
Environmental Concerns
  • Air Quality
  • Water Quality
  • Ecosystem

20
Air Quality Concerns
  • Odor
  • Ammonia
  • Germs
  • Dust

21
Ecosystem and Habitat Concerns
  • Destruction of fish habitat
  • Destruction of Riparian Areas
  • Eutrophication (enrichment) of lakes, rivers, and
    creeks

22
Water Quality Concerns
  • Organic Matter (BOD)
  • Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) in surface water
  • Nitrate in ground water
  • Germs
  • Salts, Arsenic, Copper, Zinc
  • Antibiotics and hormones

23
BOD of Animal Waste
24
Germs in Poultry Manure
  • E. coli - intestinal bacteria can cause illness
    or death.
  • Salmonella - intestinal bacteria causes food
    poisoning or worse.
  • Viruses?

25
Other Concerns
  • Hormones - Poultry manure (like other manures)
    contains small amounts of estrogen.
  • Not much effect on humans
  • Effect on ecosystems is uncertain.
  • Antibiotics - Bacteria can develop resistance to
    antibiotics (recently documented in Salmonella)

26
Ammonia(a form of Nitrogen)
  • Kills fish
  • Consumes Oxygen (more Oxygen Demand than organic
    matter)
  • Is a plant nutrient
  • Converts to Nitrate

27
Plant Nutrients
  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus (fertilizer)
  • Cause excessive growth of aquatic plants
    (particularly algae)
  • Result moss on the water, taste and odor in
    drinking water, fish kills.

28
Where do N P come from? -- where do they go?
  • Nutrients come into the watershed every day as
    feed. Less than half goes out in the meat.
  • The rest stays behind in the litter.
  • We need to keep it out of the water.

29
How do litter nutrients get into water?
  • Stacking litter without cover
  • Runoff from fresh waste application areas
  • Runoff from fertilized pastures
  • Application to waterways
  • Leaching to ground water

30
Why do we focus on P?
  • Fresh water (especially lakes) are very sensitive
    to P.
  • Small additions of P cause a large response from
    algae.
  • Background P level is quite low.
  • Manures are not balanced fertilizer.
  • P-enriched soils cause water pollution.

31
Litter vs. Commercial Fertilizer
  • One pound of available N or P from manure equals
    one pound from fertilizer.
  • Either one can grow grass, and either one can
    pollute the water.
  • Any unmanaged fertilizer is a threat to water
    quality.

32
Manure is not a balanced fertilizer
  • Grass needs 10 parts N to 1 part P.
  • Manure has about 1 part P to 1 part N.
  • As the N is used up by plants, P is left behind.

33
Soil Test-P Buildup in Demo Plots
600
9 tons
500
6 tons
400
fertilizer
Concentration, ppm
300
3 tons
200
Control
100
0
Jun-91
Dec-91
Jul-92
Jan-93
Aug-
Mar-94
Sep-94
Apr-95
93
Date
34
(No Transcript)
35
Other ways P can get into water
  • Erosion of high P soils
  • Leaching from high P soils
  • Movement by cattle that graze on forage and
    defecate in or near the stream

36
(No Transcript)
37
Summary of problem areas
  • Stacking litter outdoors
  • Application to wet or frozen soils
  • Application too close to a stream
  • P build up in soils
  • Erosion of pastureland
  • Erosion of stream banks
  • Destruction of riparian vegetation

38
Research Results
  • Rainfall Simulator Studies

39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
What we learned from rainfall simulator studies
  • N and P runoff increases with application rate.
  • A grass buffer reduces N and P runoff (very
    significantly!).
  • Slope (3 to 15) has only a small effect
    compared to application rate.
  • Light rain (without runoff) reduces N and P for
    later rainfall.

42
What else we learned
  • Grass height has little effect.
  • Light tillage or soil aeration has little effect.
  • Commercial fertilizer is the same as litter
    (maybe worse!).
  • N and P in runoff can be very high!

43
Runoff P vs. Litter Application Rate
Concentration, ppm
Application Rate, tons/acre
44
Runoff N vs. Litter Application Rate
Concentration, ppm
Application Rate, tons/acre
45
Effect of Vegetative Bufferon Phosphate in Runoff
No Buffer
Buffer
Concentration, ppm
Application Rate
46
Pollution Control in Buffer Strips
  • Dilution
  • Deposition
  • Infiltration into the soil
  • Stabilization
  • Denitrification
  • Plant uptake

47
(No Transcript)
48
What happens if we get rainfall without runoff?
  • (the greenhouse rainfall simulator)

49
Ammonia in runoffcompared to the first event
Percent
Event
50
Phosphorus in First Runoff Event
Percent
51
P in Runoff from Pastures (6 months after litter
application)
52
What does all this mean?
  • Base litter application on soil test
    recommendations.
  • The higher the application rate, the higher the
    runoff concentration.
  • Dont apply to wet soils, frozen soils, or rocky
    areas.
  • Dont apply when heavy rain is likely.
  • Light rain can move litter into the soil.

53
What else it means...
  • Summer is a good time to apply litter, after the
    first hay harvest.
  • Soil P can increase to very high levels in just 3
    to 5 years, at 3 tons/ac.
  • Soils with high soil test P contribute P to
    runoff.
  • A vegetative buffer reduces runoff P.
  • Applying on a P-basis, supplementing with N
    reduces runoff P.

54
The USDA-EPA AFO Strategy
  • (AFOs, or Animal Feeding Operations, include
    hogs, chickens, cattle, etc.)
  • The strategy establishes a national performance
    expectation that all AFO operators implement
    Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans (CNMPs).

55
USDA-EPA AFO Strategy expects
  • Animal diets and feed to be modified to reduce
    the amount of nutrients in manure.
  • Manure to be handled and stored to prevent water
    pollution.
  • Land Application of Manure to be managed to
    minimize water quality and public health risk.

56
Oklahoma is ahead of the curve!
  • We are implementing a more aggressive strategy
    under SB 1170.
  • Our program has industry support.
  • Our producers are becoming educated.

57
Pollution control is becoming part of every day
life.
  • We expect
  • Automobile industry to have smog control,
    recycling of oil, batteries and tires.
  • Cities and towns to have waste treatment plants.
  • Homeowners to have septic tanks or sewer
    connections.
  • In another generation, our children will assume
    that pollution control was always part of
    agriculture, just like other industries!

58
Water
Our most precious Resource
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com