Title: Introduction to Stratigraphy What is stratigraphy
1 Introduction to StratigraphyWhat is
stratigraphy?
- Stratigraphy
- the study of large-scale vertical and lateral
relationships between units of sedimentary rock
that are defined on the basis of lithological or
physical properties, paleontological
characteristics, geophysical characteristics,
geophysical properties, age relationships and
geographic position and distribution. (i.e., its
the filing system for the rock record) - Stratigraphy is based on Stenos and Huttons
laws. - The fact that rocks were originally laid down in
a fluidized form was noted by medieval and
renaissance scientists (e.g. Steno, Da Vinci). - Modern sequence stratigraphic concepts stem from
work of Grabau (1906), Blackwelder (1909),
Barrell (1917), Wheeler (1958) and Sloss (1963).
2 Formal Schemes(as espoused by the NACSN,
1982)
- Lithostratigraphy
- Allostratigraphy
- Sequence Stratigraphy
- Genetic Sequence stratigraphy
- Depositional sequence stratigraphy
- Biostratigraphy
- Chronostratigraphy
- Cyclostratigraphy
- Magnetostratigraphy
- Pedostratigraphy
- Event Stratigraphy
- Morphostratigraphy
3 Informal Schemes
- Lithostratigraphy
- Allostratigraphy
- Sequence Stratigraphy
- Genetic Sequence stratigraphy
- Depositional sequence stratigraphy
- Biostratigraphy
- Chronostratigraphy
- Cyclostratigraphy
- Magnetostratigraphy
- Pedostratigraphy
- Event Stratigraphy
- Morphostratigraphy
4(NACSN, 1981)
(Holbrook, 2001)
5Warning Signs on the Road Ahead
Sequence Vs Seismic
Descriptive Genetic?
Van Wagoner et al. (1988)
6Quaternary oxygen isotope stages
(Stanley, 2005)
- Grabau (1906)
- principles of sedimentary overlap.
- Showed onlap, offlap relationships in Paleozoic
strata of North America.
7Penn. cyclothems
- Barrell (1917)
- recognized relationship between time and
stratigraphy. - This figure was driven by early attempts to use
sedimentation rates to calculate the age of the
Earth.
(Stanley, 2005)
8Sloss Sequences
(Stanley, 2005)
Wheelers diagram
9The Seismic Revolution in subsurface stratigraphy
- Explosion of subsurface data driven by need to
fuel WW1 and WW2. - Development of Well logs, Cores and Seismic
- Seismic data was acquired for petroleum
exploration during latter half of the 20th C. - Seismic imaging developed form technology used in
WW2 to locate submarines. - Sub-sea floor images also produced.
- Several advantages
- Provided continuous subsurface image of
sedimentary basin fills. - Structure and stratigraphic relationships
observed in areas not previously accessible. - Could compare seismic data from around the world.
- Scientists at Exxon recognized the stratigraphic
significance of the seismic tool (Vail et al.,
1977). - New data amenable to analysis using concepts
developed by Wheeler and others. - Developed science of seismic stratigraphy.
10(No Transcript)
11Accommodation
Accommodation
12Lapping Relationships
Parasequences
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
13Parasequence sets
Parasequences in well logs
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
14(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
15(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
16Missing In Action?
Type 2 Sequence Boundary?
Shelf-Margin Wedge?
(AGI Data Sheets, Holbrook)
17Ramp-type Basins
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
18Normal Regression
Forced Regression
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
19Ramp-type Basins
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
20Sequence-Stratigraphic Surfaces
(Embry, 2002)
(Embry, 2002)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
21Contrasting Views on Normal vs. Forced Regression
Hunt and Tucker (1992) sequence boundary
Lowstand Lowstand (Posamentier, et al 1992) Or
Falling Stage (Hunt and Tucker, 1992)
Posamentier, et al., (1992) sequence boundary
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
22(Embry, 2002)
(Embry, 2002)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
23Importance of Correlation in Defining Surfaces
(Outcrop)
(Stanley, 2005)
24Importance of Correlation in Defining Surfaces
(Subsurface)
Sequence Boundaries Correlated in Well logs
mfs in Seismic
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
25Sequence Boundaries
Spatial Variability in Surfaces
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
26Differential Incision of Valleys and Channels and
the continuity of Sequence Boundaries
Cooper Creek Australia
Colville Delta
27(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
Hanging-valley Sequence Boundaries
28Multivalley Surface in
Mesa Rica
(Holbrook, 2001)
29Regionally Continuous Surfaces
The Lower Mesa Rica Sandstone is an 84-km
Single-Story Channel Sheet
Lower Mesa Rica Sandstone
(Holbrook, et al, 2006)
30Recognizing Incised Valleys
Terrace architecture in the Trinity River, Gulf
Coastal Plain (Blum, 2006)
31Terraces in
(Holbrook, 2001)
32Importance of Channel Stacking
(Holbrook, 2001)
5
2
3
1
33Importance of Channel Dimension
Some Typical channel depths Lower Mississippi
18m Lower Missouri 7m Middle Rio Grande 3m
34Incised Valley on 3-D Seismic
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
35Importance of truncations and facies shifts
36Valley fill types
Cap of marine Graneros Shale
Fluvial fills
37Gironde Estuary Model (Posamentier and Allen,
1999)
38Tidal Ravinement
Courtesy of Brian Willis
39Sequence Boundaries vs. Settings (Alluvial)
Fluvial-on-Fluvial SBs
40Sequence Boundaries vs. Settings (Alluvial)
View of cliff, parallel to flow
(Adams and Bhattacharya, 2005)
Castlegate
Blackhawk
BLACKHAWK Laterally continuous 5-8 m-thick
channel-belts encased in floodplain
deposits. CASTLEGATE Amalgamated 4-7 m-thick
channel-belt sandstones
41Sequence Boundaries across the shelf
42Interfluvial Sequence Boundaries vs. Parasequence
tops
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
43Correlative Conformity
(Embry, 2002)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
44Regressive Surface of Marine Erosion
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Embry, 2002)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
45Transgressive Surfaces (TS)
TS
TS
(Lockley et al, 2006)
Colorado River Valley, Texas
TS
TS
Highstand
Falling Stage/ Lowstand
TS
(Blum, 2006)
46Transgressive Surface of Erosion (TSE)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
47Maximum Flooding Surfaces
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
48Maximum Flooding Surfaces
Carbonate zone between fossiliferous marine
shales Condensed Section?
49Maximum Flooding Surfaces Cautions!
Extended View
Philoid algal mounds in Penn. Fort Worth Basin,
Texas
50Maximum Flooding Surfaces
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
51Architectural-Element Analysis
(Miall, 1996)
52Fluvial Architectural Elements
Downstream accretion element
Sandy bed form
Gravel bar element
53Fluvial Architectural Elements
Overbank fine
Lateral accretion element
54Primary Architectural Elements
Submarine Fan Architectural Elements
(Posamentier and Kolla, 2003)
55Submarine Fan Architectural Elements
(Posamentier and Kolla, 2003)
56AEA The Technique
(Miall, 1996)
(Holbrook, 2001)
57Fluvial Example
(Holbrook, 2001)
58Fluvial Example
5
2
3
1
59Eolian example
60Eolian example
(Permian Cedar Mesa c.o. Rip Langford)
61Eolian example
(Permian Cedar Mesa c.o. Rip Langford)
62Sequence Boundaries and Architectural Hierarchies
Sequence Boundaries
(Holbrook, 2001)
63Sequence Boundaries vs. Architectural Hierarchies
64(Holbrook, 2001)
65(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
66Drapes on Reactivation Surfaces
Drapes on Dune/Ripple Sets
Drapes between Dune Sets (1st)
0 - 2nd - Order Drapes
Drape on Dune Sets (2nd)
Migrating Dune Sets
Drapes on Reactivation Surfaces (0)
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
67Low- Stage Filling
3rd - 4th-Order Drapes Nested Channel and Bar
Surfaces
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
68High- Stage Cutting
Channel and Bar Draping
3rd - 4th-Order Drapes Nested Channel and Bar
Surfaces
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
693rd - 4th- Order Drapes
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
705th - and 6th - Order Surfaces Channel and
Channel-Belt Scours
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
71Origin, Muddy Sandstone Sheets
Dominance of Basal Channel Fill Under Conditions
of Intensive Reworking and Low Accommodation
Space
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
727th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
737th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
747th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
5
2
3
1
75Sequence Boundary
9th - Order Surfaces Sequence Boundaries
76Implications
- Few surfaces generate sufficiently continuous
barriers to compartmentalize a reservoir, but
they can inhibit flow, locally form pocket traps,
and reduce production from estimated levels. - Low-order surfaces impose strike- and
dip-oriented permeability grains that operates at
the scale of wells, whereas high-order surfaces
impose a dip-oriented grain that operates at the
scale of fields and wells. - Only the highest-order surfaces may be traced
between wells routinely. - A general relationship exists between
sequence-boundary morphology and architecture of
overlying fluvial sandstone.
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)