Title:
1Â Operant Sound Discrimination In Rats Emily
Fincher Laura Phillips Randolph
College Lynchburg, VA 24503
Introduction According to Chase (2006), operant
learning is when an organisms behavior is
strengthened or weakened as a result of the
consequences for that behavior. Positive
reinforcement is an operant procedure where
behavior is strengthened because of the
introduction of an appetitive stimulus. Discrimin
ation is when a behavior is more likely to occur
in one situation but not in others (Chase, 2006),
such as when sound is present. In operant
discrimination training, sound could be a
stimulus that indicates the availability of a
reward if the correct behavior is
performed. Past research has shown that it is
possible for animals to learn to discriminate
between different types of music, such as the
study by Porter and Neuringer (1984) using
pigeons. The study found that pigeons were able
to discriminate between the music of Bach and
Stravinsky. Through operant discrimination
training, the researchers hope to determine if it
is possible for rats to discriminate between
music and white noise.
Figure 1
- Results
- A paired samples t-test showed a significant
decrease in latency to dig between the first
trail day (M13.63, SD9.04) and the last trail
day (M48, SD30.69), t(7)-3.36, p.01. - By the fourth day, both subjects had achieved a
50 correct cup choice. - For the test trial the preference index scores
were compared to chance (.33). Only one trial
exceeded chance, with a score of .53. A paired
samples t-test of all preference scores (M.30,
SD.16) show no statistical significance,
t(3)-.40, p.72.
- Discussion
- While the statistics show that the subjects were
able to learn reinforcements were available, they
did not show any discrimination to sound.
Although, past research has shown that it is
possible for animals to learn to discriminate
between different types of music, the results of
this study were not conclusive. - The procedure used for the two rats differed in
the with one rat receiving pre-exposure and the
other receiving one additional training day. - Future research might investigate whether it is
easier for subjects to learn the difference
between two types of music instead of one type of
music and white noise.
- Method
- Subjects
- The subjects used were two adult male, Long Evans
rats obtained from the Harlan Breeding Company.
The subjects were placed on food deprivation and
their weight was maintained at 85 of their
free-feeding weight and water was available ad
libitum. - Apparatus
- The apparatus used was a T-maze consisting of
three arms of equal lengths. One sand filled cup
was placed at the end of each of two arms, one of
which contained the reward (Fruit Loops). A CD
with three tracks was used, the first track
consisting of both music and white noise, the
second track consisting of music alone, and the
third with white noise. - Procedure
- At the beginning of the experiment, one rat
(Ivan) was exposed to the maze for five minutes
while the first track played with no cups or
rewards. The second rat (Mick) was not given a
habituation period. - Ivan received four training days and Mick
received five. - In all trials, the reward was placed in the left
arm when music was played, and placed in the
right arm when white noise was played. Latency to
dig and first cup choice was recorded. - All training and shaping days consisted of four
trials, counterbalanced, and the rats were given
a maximum of five minutes to retrieve at least 5
fruit loops. - The first day consisted of shaping with the
reward first exposed and then gradually buried
until it reached a shallow depth. The depth
remained constant throughout the training. - The testing day consisted of two trialone for
music and the other for white noiseand the rats
were given three minutes in the maze. The time
spent in each arm was recorded as well as latency
to dig and first cup choice.
Figure 2
References Chance, P. (2006). Learning and
behavior Active learning edition (5th ed.).
Belmont, CA Thomson/Wadsworth. Porter, D.,
Neuringer, A. (1984). Music discrimination by
pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology
Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 138-148.