Title: Fundamentals of Government Contract Claims and Protests
1Fundamentals of Government Contract Claims and
Protests
- August 17, 2005
- Alan A. Pemberton
- Covington Burling
2Overview
- Differences Between Protests and Claims
- Protests
- Where to protest
- When to protest
- Protest procedures
- Examples of protest issues and remedies
- Strategic considerations
- Claims
- Basic statutory requirements
- Examples of claims
- Subcontract claims
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
3What is the difference between a Protest and a
Claim?
- PROTEST - a complaint about the Governments
handling of the procurement process up to and
including award - Pre-award (complaints about the rules of the
game) - Post-award (complaints about the award decision
and how the game was played) - CLAIM a complaint by a party to an existing
contract against another party to the contract. - Contractor Claims vs. Government
- Government Claims vs. Contractors
- 3rd Party Beneficiary Claims?
4Why do these differences matter?
- Strict timing rules apply, especially to
protests. - Special procedures apply, especially to claims.
5Examples of Grounds for Claims and Protests
- HHS releases RFP that says that any party awarded
a contract for vaccine will have to produce it in
the United States. - Manufacturers contract is terminated by DoD for
default because of late deliveries, and DoD
announces it will reprocure the item from another
source. - Government awards a contract to a competitor that
you know lacks the capacity to do the job right. - Government instructs contractor to make changes
in product under fixed-price contract that will
greatly increase contractors costs of
performance.
6Protests
7Protests Where to Protest
- Agency
- Contracting Officer
- Higher Level Intra-Agency Authority
- Government Accountability Office
- U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- SBA
- protests of small business status in set-asides
8Protests Basic Timing Requirements
- Agency or to GAO
- Preaward protests before next offers are due
- Postaward protests if no debriefing, 10 days
after notice - Debriefing request 3 days after notice
- Protest filing 5 days after a required
debriefing to invoke automatic stay - Protest filing still timely if 10 days after
debriefing - Exclusion from competitive range similar to
award notice - Other Issues within 10 days of knowledge
9Protests Basic Timing Requirements
- Court of Federal Claims
- Court generally follows GAO rule as to preaward
protests. - Equitable timing requirements court will assess
whether plaintiff has acted unfairly or without
excuse in bringing suit long after award
10Protests Sample Protest Issues
- Pre-Award Issues
- Restrictive Specifications
- Ambiguous Specifications
- Improper Sole Source or Limit on Competition
- Unreasonable bundling of requirements
- Improper RFP terms
- Post-Award Issues
- Improper Evaluation
- Use of unannounced criteria
- Failure to follow RFP criteria
- Unfair application of criteria
- Improper Exclusion from Competitive Range
- Failure to discuss significant weaknesses
- Unequal Discussions
- Technical transfusion
- Basic Theme lack of equal treatment among
offerors
11Protest Procedures
- Agency
- Quick, informal resolution, relatively low legal
costs - Little discovery
- GAO
- Resolution in 100 days
- Relatively full discovery with protective order
- Supplemental protests based on documents produced
- Possible hearings
- Court of Federal Claims
- No set time for resolution, but proceedings can
be extremely expedited. - Relatively full discovery possible depositions
- Supplemental or amended protests possible
- Oral argument on cross-motions
12Protests Strategic Considerations
- Angering the customer
- Agency protests less disruptive than GAO or Court
- Likelihood of success
- Depends on the issue
- Effectiveness of stay
- Cost / speed of decision
- Likelihood of discovery to uncover new errors
- Winning the protest versus winning the contract
- Possibility of corrective action that cures
problem without helping protester
13Protests Strategic Considerations
14Claims
15Claims Basic Statutory RequirementsContract
Disputes Act
- CDA procedures begin with making a written demand
or assertion called a claim. - Claim may be presented within 6 years of when it
accrues. (Note different from appeal time from
final decision.) - Claims over 100,000 must be certified.
- Claim results in Contracting Officers final
decision. - Appeal from final decision
- To a Board of Contract Appeals within 90 days OR
- To the Court of Federal Claims within one year.
- CDA procedures are exclusive.
16Claims Subcontractor Claims
- CDA claims do not generally include subcontractor
claims against prime contractor. - Subcontractor claims are generally subject to
ordinary state contract law governing contracts
between private parties, with federal law used to
interpret FAR-type provisions - Some subcontractors may obtain agreement of prime
contractor to sponsor a CDA claim, in which the
sub sues the Government in the primes name.
17Claims Examples of CDA Claims
- Price Adjustment issues
- Excusable delay/Government-caused delay
- Appeal of default termination
- Defective pricing
- Alleged noncompliance with contract terms
18Claims Examples of Claims NOT covered by CDA
- Fraud / criminal matters
- Tort Claims
- Subcontractor claims
- Contracts between U.S. and Foreign Govt.
19Claims Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Boards and Courts encourage ADR and have a
variety of approaches - Non-binding mini-trials
- Mediation
- Settlement judges
- Party-designed processes