Title: Payback Period Analysis
1Payback Period Analysis Life-Cycle Cost
Lecture 5 24 August, 2007
2So far -
- Compound interest/equivalence
- PW and AW analysis techniques
- MARR
- EAC, AOC, CR costs
- Selecting alternatives using AW analysis
3This week -
- Example - AW analysis
- Payback Period Analysis
- Conventional
- Discounted
- Life Cycle Costs
- Acquisition phase
- Operation phase
42005 exam Q4
- A company is evaluating two alternative methods
of producing one of its product lines. - Method A costs 80,000 initially and will have a
15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The
operating cost of this method will be 30,000 per
year. - Method B will have an initial cost of 120,000,
an operating cost of 8,000 per year and a
40,000 salvage value after its operating life of
2 years. - At an interest rate of 18, which method should
be used?
518 Table
6Solution
7Payback Period Analysis
- Two forms for this method
- Conventional Payback Period (zero interest rate)
- Discounted Payback Period (uses an interest rate)
- Payback is the period of time it takes for the
cash flows to recover the initial investment. - It is useful in providing the initial screening
for a number of alternatives. - What is the relationship between the payback
period and the actual useful life of an item?
8Example
- An organisation leases 4 x 2 Mbps point-to-point
digital service to interconnect its private
network in 5 buildings in the CBD from the local
telecom carrier for 52,000 per annum. - The organisation decided to install and operate
its own digital microwave radio links for the
capital investment of 140,000 - The annual licence fee 1,500 and maintenance
contract 4,800 will be ongoing expenses.
9Network Diagram
2
3
2Mbps
2Mbps
1
2Mbps
2Mbps
5
4
10Conventional Payback Period
- The conventional payback period for the capital
investment would be - np 140,000 / 52,000 2.7 years
- This method is very simple and can be give very
misleading results. - It may be acceptable as a rough indication only
but not as a business evaluation tool.
11Questions to be asked
- What is the revenue or benefit that the
organisation gets from this service ? - Where will the organisation get the 140,000
initial investment from ? - What is the useful life of the equipment ?
- Are there any other costs or factors that need to
be considered ?
12Possible Answers
- Having the private links, the organisation will
not have to pay 52,000 a year for connectivity. - If the organisation borrowed the money, it will
have to pay interest. Even if the organisation
had the money, it can earn interest on it.
(Opportunity Cost) - The useful life has to be significantly longer
than the payback period (typically 10 to 15
years) - System design, permits and licences,
installation, commissioning, and maintenance must
be considered.
13Discounted Payback Period
- An interest rate i gt 0 is used for this
calculation. - There is a logical linkage between this method
and the breakeven analysis. - The analysis produces a payback period np that is
the estimated time, usually in years, it will
take for the estimated revenues and other
economic benefits to recover the initial
investment and a stated rate of return.
14Discounted Payback Approach
- Find the value of np such that
where P is the initial investment, NCF is the
estimated net cash flow for each year t as
determined by the equation
NCF cash inflows - cash outflows
15Calculations
- Given the requirement 0 - P ?NCFt(P/F,i,t)
- and in this simple case
-
- ?NCFt(P/F,i,t) A(P/A,i,t)
- for P 140,000, A 52,000 and i 0.1 (10)
- gt 0 52,000 (P/A,10,n)
- gt (P/A,i,n) 2.692
- the number of years (n) is 3.29 years
- derived by trial and error using Excel or by
interpolation using the 10 table
1610 Table
17Comments
- Even if the organisation did not have to borrow
the 140,000 an interest rate must be considered. - The discounted cash flow method show that the
payback period is much longer than that obtained
using the conventional method. - The ongoing licence and maintenance fees must not
be forgotten.
18Cost Elements
- System engineering
- Permits and licences
- Capital investment (equipment)
- Installation and commissioning
- Annual maintenance
- Annual licences
- Salvage/Disposal
19Payback Method - Summary
- Payback is only a rough estimator of desirability
- Use as an initial screening method
- Avoid using this method as a primary analysis
technique for selection projects - Totally avoid the no-return payback period
20Payback Method - Summary
- The No-return method
- Does not employ the time value of money
- Disregards all cash flows past the payback time
period - If used, can lead to conflicting selections when
compared to more technically correct methods like
present worth!
21Life Cycle Costs ( LCC )
22Life Cycle Costs (LCC)
- Extension of the Present Worth method
- Used for projects over their entire life span
where cost estimates are employed - Used for
- Military/Defense Projects
- New Product Lines
- Large construction projects
23Phases of Life Cycle
- Needs Assessment Phase
- Conceptual Design Phase
- Detailed Design Phase
- Production/Construction Phase
- Operation (upgrading to extend) Phase
- Retirement/Disposal Phase
24Life Cycle Two General Phases
Cost-
Cumulative Life Cycle Costs
Time
Acquisition Phase
Operation Phase
25The Design Phase
- The design phase is the most critical phase in
the system engineering process. - If not managed correctly, it can lead to some
undesired outcomes - There will always be changes during the design
phase, the amount of which can be attributed to
the phases preceding it.
26LCC Impact of Design Changes
- Cost of a design change tends to multiply by 10
with each phase - Any design changes that might occur late in the
life cycle drastically increase the total life
cycle costs! - Design freeze period
27LCC Acquisition Phase
Rule About 80 of LCC are locked in by the end
of the Acquisition Phase. Emphasis is on good
design!
Costs -
Needs Assessment
Conceptual Design
Detailed Design
Acquisition Phase
28Life-Cycle Costs Purpose
- Make as explicit as possible the relationship of
costs over the total life span of a
product/system - Design Process Objective
- Minimize the life-cycle costs
- And meet other performance requirements
- By making correct trade-offs between costs in the
acquisition phase and costs during the operations
phase
29Life-Cycle Costs Warning
- Beware of introducing certain cost- cutting
measures in the acquisition phase and early
production phase - Such cost-cutting measures could impact the
future operations and degrade safety or require
modifications later on - These cost-cutting measures can be misleading and
dangerous!
30Life-Cycle Costs Warning
- Engineers have a ethical and moral responsibility
to ensure that designs are - Economically sound
- Functional
- Safe
- Perform as expected
31LCC of the Microwave System
- For Microwave example
- Useful life 10 years
- Interest rate 10
- Initial costs 153,000
- Recurring costs 8,800 per annum
- Salvage value 0
- Total PW 207,072
- Total PW for carrier-provided service 346,717
- Refer to the spreadsheet example Microwave
Example also includes AW analysis.
32References
- Blank, L., Tarquin, A., Engineering Economy,
McGraw-Hill, 5/e (Chapter 5)
Thanks for your attention