Title: Developmental Education:
1 Developmental Education The P-16
ChallengeResearch indicates that more than 40
of incoming college freshmen are required to
enroll in remedial courses. This session will
explore whether developmental education provides
a bridge to college level work or becomes a
barrier to college success. Additionally, the
session will address how high schools, community
colleges and universities can work together to
improve outcomes in developmental education.
- Frank B. Ashley III, Ed.D.
- Interim Provost
- Texas AM University-Commerce
2Texas Higher Education Coordinating
BoardClosing the Gaps
- Participation and Success
- To achieve Texas bright future, enrollments in
our colleges and universities must increase in
the next 10 years by 600,000 students over
todays 1.2 million. Since the expected
increase based on past trends would be 300,000
students, we have our work cut out for us. But
enrolling more people is not enough they must
graduate, too! Texas will not achieve the results
it needs if students do not succeed in their
higher education endeavors. - THECB Website
3THECB
- More than 200,000 undergraduates in Texas'
public colleges and universities are - Under prepared for college-level coursework.
- The report focuses on 4 areas
- gt Under prepared students
- gt Program effectiveness
- gt Best practices
- gt Funding
4Just the Facts
- Nationally, more than 40 of students arrive on
college campuses needing remedial work - Only about half of the high-school graduates who
enter college have pursued a college-preparatory
curriculum - Colleges and Universities spends billions of
dollars a years on remedial education - Source The Chronicle of Higher Education
5Developmental Education Statewide Data
Profile
- Provided by Cynthia Ferrell
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
6Underprepared Students
In Texas, over 40 of all new students were underprepared for college.
Source Fall 2002 FTIC, THECB TASP LBB Performance Measure FY2005
7Hispanic and African American Students are overrepresented in underprepared populations.
Source Fall 2002 FTIC, THECB TASP LBB Performance Measures FY2005
8The Blame Game orWhos Fault is It?
9Statewide, students who completed a more rigorous high school curriculum were half as likely to be underprepared for college.
RHSPRecommended or Distinguished High School Program MHSPMinimum High School Program Source Fall 2002 FTIC, THECB TASP LBB Performance Measures FY2005
10Academic Requirements in a Typical Class
Never Less than Once a Month A few times a month Weekly or more often
Write a 1-5 page paper H.S. College 19 16 48 44 24 32 9 8
Write a paper of more than 5 pages H.S. College 61 28 37 67 2 5 0 0
Make Presentation in Class H.S. College 11 21 59 62 24 14 6 3
Participate in Class discussions H.S. College 1 7 4 6 9 17 86 71
Work with other students on Projects H.S. College 4 20 29 36 36 26 31 18
Memorize facts, ideas or methods H.S. College 5 12 18 23 28 23 50 42
Source Chronicle of Higher Education (3/10/06)
11What Teachers and Professors Think
Subject Not well Prepared Somewhat well prepared Very well prepared Dont Know
Science 8 20 44 32 38 5 11 42 High School College
Math 9 32 46 32 37 4 7 32 High School College
Writing 10 44 49 47 36 6 4 3 High School College
Reading/ Understanding difficulty Materials 15 41 56 48 26 10 3 2 High School College
Source Chronicle of Higher Education (3/10/06)
12Program Effectiveness
Only 10 of all new underprepared students, who took developmental courses, gained college-readiness in their first year.
Source Fall 2002 FTIC, THECB TASP LBB Performance Measures FY2005
13The Good News for Texas
Almost 60 of all new under-prepared students persisted from Fall to Fall.
Source Fall 2002 FTIC, THECB TASP LBB Performance Measures FY2005
14The Bad News
One-fifth of all new underprepared students earn a certificate or degree within six years, compared to almost one-half of prepared students.
Source THECB Analysis of CB001, CBM002, and CBM009
15Best Practices
Based on a literature review of state and national best practices include
Institutional Commitment Centralization Academic Advising Alternative Interventions Program Evaluation
16Educational Policy InstituteDr.. Watson Scott
Swail
- Websites Educatoinalpolicy.org
- Studentretention.org
17Financial Issues Educational Legacy Attitude
Toward Learning Religious Background Maturity Soci
al Coping Skills Communication Skills Attitude
Toward Others Cultural Values Expectations Goal
Commitment Family Influence Peer Influence Social
Lifestyle
Academic Rigor Quality of Learning Aptitude Conten
t Knowledge Critical-Thinking Ability Technology
Ability Study Skills Learning Skills Time
Management Academic-Related Extracurricular
Activities
The Student Experience
Financial Aid
Recruitment Admissions
Academic Services
Student Services
Curriculum Instruction
Source (Dr. Scott Swail Educational Policy
Institute)
18Administrators Must ensure there is support for
the following
- Social and Academic Integration
- Peer relations
- Role Models and Mentors
- Academic Preparedness
- Campus Climate
- Diversity in Faculty, staff and students
- Nature and quality of interactions in and out of
classroom - Commitment to Education Goals and the Institution
- Tinto (1993)The stronger the goal and
institutional commitment the more likely the
student will graduate - Financial Aid
- Low income and minority students who receive
grants generally are more likely to persist that
those who receive loans - The shift in aid from, grants to loans and from
need based to merit based programs adversely
affects both enrollment and persistence for
minority students.
Source Educational Policy Institute (3/06)
19Texas Education Agency P-16 Council
Developmental Education Subcommittee
- Membership
- Community Colleges 6
- Four Year Institutions 7
- Public Schools 2
- TEA 5
- Governmental Agencies 2
- Act/College Board - 1 each
- Governors Office 2
- Legislative Budget Board - 1
- Charge
- Development of recommendations to effectively
address developmental education in Texas
20Making Developmental education a Priority for the
Campus
- Faculty
- Acceptance of Necessity for Developmental
Education - Training
- Regular faculty vs. adjuncts vs. Teaching
Assistants - Reward System
- Curriculum Alignment
- K-12 with College Courses
- Two-year with four-year
- Developmental Courses with next level courses
- Resources courses more expensive
- Smaller courses
- Tutoring
- Tools and software
- Minimal subvention
- Miscellaneous
- Faculty more concerned with teaching instead of
learning - Focus must be placed on learning outcomes
21Major Recommendations
- Texas increase the preparedness of developmental
educators - Developmental education certification and
advanced degree programs - Developmental education content standards be
developed and include appropriate learning
strategies - Content standards employed to align learning
objects in developmental education courses with
credit bearing courses - To facility transfer of developmental courses
among institution of higher education - Charge the Education Research Centers (HB1) with
developing a developmental education research
agenda to collect and disseminate relevant data
through appropriate and rigorous research
methods.
22Recommendations on Consent Agreement
- Adoption of statewide developmental education
missions statement - Adoption of statewide definition of developmental
education - Appointment of the Subcommittee as the Texas
Success Initiative Advisory Committee - Completion of a study on the costs associated
with developmental education - The inclusion of a developmental education
accountable measure of underpreparded student
completion of baccalaureate degrees for all
institutions of higher education
23Keys to a Successful Developmental Education
Program
2425 Steps to Effective Developmental Education
(McClenny)
- Make Student success in Development education and
institution wide commitment - Establish a goal to ensure that student who come
under-prepared are able to succeed at rates at
least as high as those who came fully prepared. - Carefully coordinate the various units involved
in eh delivery of developmental courses - Establish consistency between exit standards for
developmental courses and entry standards for
college-level courses. - Careful selection of faculty and staff who work
with developmental education is critical
2525 Best Practices (cont.)
- Provide professional development for all faculty
and staff who work with under-prepared students - Face the issue of mandatory assessment and
placement, late registration, and simultaneous
enrollment in college-level courses - Recognize the importance of orientation or a
college success course at the beginning of the
developmental sequence - Incorporate learning communities and other cohort
experience - Recognize that at-risk students need structure in
courses and support services
2625 Best Practices (cont.)
- Integrate the work of tutors (peer and
professional) with the carefully selected
faculty members - Recognize the potential of open or online labs
(reading, writing, and math) to support
instruction - Use a variety of teaching methods (group
projects, mediated learning, etc.) - Recognize the potential for computer-based
(assisted) instruction which can be matched with
tutoring to deliver high tech-high touch
services. - Avoid confusion between language acquisition (ESL
or ESOL) and the need for basis skills
remediation among second language learners
2725 Best Practices (Cont.)
- Provide prompt feedback on student performance
including frequent testing - Develop links with GED providers (on or off
campus) and foster transitions for students - Review the work of Roueche, Boylan, McCabe,
Tinto, and Adelman - Expand and enhance the pre-enrollment (and
concurrent) activity with the public schools - Consider certification from National Association
for Developmental Education
28Best Practices (cont.)
- Consider case management (advocate/coach for the
most at-risk students - Provide supplemental learning opportunities,
particularly for skill practice - Commit to program evaluation which includes
cohort tracking - Find the most appropriate computer-adaptive test
for entry assessment and supplement with writing
samples if resources permit - Stress the development of critical think skills
across the curriculum
29So how are we doing?
30Institutional Commitment
90 of institutions reported that developmental education is a part of their strategic plan.
State Wide
4-Year
2-Year
31Centralization
33 of institutions stated that their developmental courses are organized within a centralized unit.
State Wide
4- Year
2-Year
32Academic Advising
Almost 90 of institutions stated that academic advising is mandatory for all under-prepared students. (Down about 10 over 4 years)
State Wide
4-Year
2 - Year
33Alternative Interventions
Fewer than 30 of institutions reported offering Learning Communities for underprepared students.
34Alternative Interventions
Few institutions reported offering Paired or Linked Courses for underprepared students.
35Alternative Interventions
30 or fewer institutions reported offering Supplemental Instruction for underprepared students.
36Evaluation
Almost 70 of institutions stated that they evaluate the effectiveness of their developmental efforts and make improvements
37Where do we go from here?
- If you admit them, you should do everything
necessary for them to be successful - Dr. Raymund Paredes. TX Commissioner
of Higher Education
38Funding
Developmental Education Appropriations
Over a six year period Developmental semester credit hours have increased by nearly 20 Developmental appropriations have decreased 5
394- Year Universities
- Most have not had to address this in the past
- Requirements for Admissions
- Class ranks or SAT/ACT Scores
- Self-selection by Students
- Now part of THECB Accountability
- TEA Associate Commissioner for P-16
- P-16 Subcommittee on Developmental Education
- Two Key Issues
- Faculty
- Resources not in place for intervention
- Now looking to the Community Colleges for
guidance
40Accountability Coming to your theater soon