The Ecology of Peer Victimization in Middle School Youth: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

The Ecology of Peer Victimization in Middle School Youth:

Description:

An Examination of Transitional Years and Internalizing ... The examination of these variables is crucial for effective prevention and intervention efforts. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: target
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Ecology of Peer Victimization in Middle School Youth:


1
The Ecology of Peer Victimization in Middle
School Youth
  • An Examination of Transitional Years and
    Internalizing Difficulties.

Susan M. Swearer, Ph.D. Kisha M. Haye,
M.A. Paulette Tam Cary, M.A. Kelly Brey,
B.A. University of Nebraska Lincoln Mickie
Frazier-Koontz Lincoln Public Schools
36th Annual AABT Annual Convention2002 Reno, NV
2
The Nebraska Bullying Prevention and Intervention
Project (NBPIP)
  • A partnership between Lincoln Public Schools and
    the University of Nebraska Lincoln.
  • Currently in the fifth year of a five-year
    longitudinal study examining ecological variables
    in bullying over time and across schools.
  • Researchers provide yearly feedback to
    participant schools.

3
(No Transcript)
4
How Prevalent is Bullying?
  • 75 of school-aged children report being bullied
    at least one time during their school years
    (Hoover, Oliver, Hazler, 1992).
  • 8.4 (Nansel et al., 2001) to 20 (Limber
    Small, 2000) of children report being bullied
    several times per week while 24.2 (Nansel et
    al., 2001) to 44.6 (Haynie et al., 2001) report
    being bullied at least once during the past year.

5
Bullying as an Ecological Phenomenon
  • Internal factors in the individual (e.g.,
    impulsivity, depression, anxiety, anger) interact
    with the social environment (e.g., class rules,
    teacher behaviors, peer group), which then serve
    to encourage or inhibit bullying and/or
    victimization behaviors (Swearer Doll, 2001).

6
Bullying and Internalizing Factors
  • Research has demonstrated that bullying is
    related to depressive (Craig, 1998 Forero,
    McLellan, Rissel, Bauman, 1999 Kaltiala-Heino,
    Rimpela, Marttunen, Rimpela, Rantanen, 1999
    Kumpulainen et al., 1998 Swearer, Song, Cary,
    Eagle, Mickelson, 2001) and anxious (Craig,
    1998 Graham Juvonen, 1998 Hodges Perry,
    1996 Perry, Kusel, Perry, 1988 Olweus, 1978,
    1994 Slee, 1994 Swearer, Song, Cary, Eagle,
    Mickelson, 2001) symptomatology.

7
Bullying and Internalizing Factors
  • Consistent with an ecological framework, the
    co-occurrence of bullying and internalizing
    factors may affect how bullies, victims, and
    bully-victims interact with others and their
    environment.
  • The examination of these variables is crucial for
    effective prevention and intervention efforts.

8
(No Transcript)
9
Bullying and Transitional Years
  • Bullying increases with the transition into
    middle school (Pellegrini Long, 2002).
  • Friendships minimize victimization during this
    transition (Pellegrini Bartini, 2000).
  • Having supportive friendships in 6th grade were
    predictors for 7th grade adjustment (Pellegrini,
    1994).
  • Students who display anxious and depressive
    symptomatology have fewer supportive friendships
    (Last, 1989 Rudolph et al., 1994).

10
Problem
  • While previous research has examined the
    importance of the transition from elementary
    school to middle school in terms of peer
    affiliation and adjustment, less is known about
    the influence of internalizing problems and the
    progression into and out of middle school.

11
Prediction
  • We predicted that depression and anxiety would be
    more pronounced during the transition year into
    middle school and the transition year out of
    middle school for students involved in bullying
    and victimization.

12
Comprehensive Assessment (NBPIP)
  • Assessment of bully/victim status
    Self-nomination (Bully survey), Peer nomination,
    Teacher nomination.
  • Assessment of internalizing problems Depression,
    Anxiety, Hopelessness, Locus of Control,
    Aggression.
  • Assessment of school climate School climate
    measure, grades, GPA, test scores, office
    referrals, absences, suspensions.

13
Bully Survey Definition
  • Bullying is anything from teasing or saying mean
    things, leaving someone out of a group, to
    physical attacks (hitting, pushing, kicking)
    where one person or a group of people picks on
    another person over a long time. Bullying refers
    to things that happen in school, on the school
    grounds, or going to and from school.

14
Bully Survey (Swearer, 2001)
  • A four part, 31-item survey that queries students
    regarding their experiences with bullying, and
    perceptions and attitudes toward bullying.
  • Part A asks about when they were victims of
    bullying during the past year.
  • Part B asks about the participants observations
    of bullying behavior among their peers during the
    past year
  • Part C asks about when they bullied other
    students during the past year.
  • Part D asks about attitudes toward bullying.

15
Bully/Victim Status
  • Self-nominations from the bully survey (n 469)
    in 2002
  • 8 bullies (11 males, 24 females)
  • 35 victims (71 males, 91 females)
  • 24 bully-victims (52 males, 61 females)
  • 33 no status (70 males, 89 females).

16
Overall Bully/Victim Status 2002
17
Instrumentation
  • The Bully Survey (Swearer, 2001)
  • Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children
    (MASC March, 1997)
  • Childrens Depression Inventory (CDI Kovacs,
    1992)

18
Participants
  • 90 middle school students from one middle school
    who completed all measures in 6th (ages 11-13),
    7th (ages 12-14), and 8th (ages 13-15) grades.
  • 44 females and 46 males.
  • The ethnicity of the sample was as follows 66
    Caucasian, 12 African-American, 9
    Asian/Asian-American, 5.5 Latino/a, 5.5 Mixed
    Minority, 1 Middle Eastern, 1 Eastern European.

19
Bully/Victim Status Across Grades
20
Mean Number of Office Referrals Across Status
  • Bullies M 7.0
  • Bully-Victims M 2.7
  • No Status M 2.1
  • Victims M 2.0

21
Overall Internalizing Problems
  • Higher depression scores were found in 6th grade
    compared to 7th grade (p lt .00) but not in 8th
    grade compared to 7th grade (p .15)
  • There were no differences across grades with
    respect to anxiety between 6th and 7th grades (p
    .29) and 7th and 8th grades (p .67).

22
Effect Sizes for CDI and MASC Scores
  • CDI 6th versus 7th Cohens d .39
  • CDI 7th versus 8th Cohens d .19
  • MASC 6th versus 7th Cohens d .14
  • MASC 7th versus 8th Cohens d .00

23
Clinical Depression Across Status by Grade (CDI gt
19)
24
Clinical Anxiety Across Status by Grade (MASC gt T
65)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Internalizing Problems and Bully/Victim Status
  • Internalizing symptomatology may exist in
    students who experience problems with bullying.
  • In middle school, bully-victims appear to be the
    most impaired subtype and experience both
    depression and anxiety.
  • Victims report significant levels of anxiety.
  • Students who experience bully/victim problems
    should be screened for depression and anxiety.

27
(No Transcript)
28
What can schools do?
  • Data from NBPIP suggest that interventions
    designed to address depression and anxiety may be
    an important component of bullying intervention
    programs--particularly in the first year of
    middle school.
  • Data from NBPIP suggest that interventions should
    be developmentally based and should address the
    transition points into and out of middle school.

29
(No Transcript)
30
Nebraska Bullying Prevention Intervention
Project
  • Susan M. Swearer, Ph.D.
  • School Psychology Program
  • 40 Teachers College Hall
  • Lincoln, NE, 68588-0345
  • (402) 472-1741
  • sswearer_at_unlserve.unl.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com