Pulmonary Embolism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Pulmonary Embolism

Description:

San Francisco General Hospital. Associate Clinical Professor ... Electrocardiogram. Oxygenation. Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Normal SpO2 does not exclude PE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:274
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: ValuedGate2279
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pulmonary Embolism


1
Pulmonary Embolism
  • Todd A. May, M.D.
  • Director, Family Practice Inpatient Service
  • San Francisco General Hospital
  • Associate Clinical Professor
  • University of California, San Francisco

2
PE A Clinical Challenge
  • Common 250,000 cases/year
  • Mimics many other illnesses
  • Potentially fatal (15)
  • Treatment potentially dangerous
  • No single reliable diagnostic test
  • Under- and over-diagnosed

3
Diagnostic Testing
  • No single noninvasive test is sufficiently
    sensitive or specific to diagnose or exclude PE
    in all patients
  • No single test can reliably rule out PE
  • Yep, that includes CT Angio (right?)

4
Clinical Approach
  • Consider PE in DDx
  • Stratify risk for PE (HP, initial lab)
  • Select appropriate diagnostic test(s)
  • Interpret results in clinical context
  • Select therapy based on clinical status

5
Risk Factors
  • General
  • Hypercoagulability
  • Stasis
  • Vascular injury

6
Clinical Presentation
  • 97 with PE have at least one of the following
  • Dyspnea
  • Tachypnea
  • Pleuritic pain
  • Presence should trigger initial suspicion

7
Clinical Presentation
  • Symptoms
  • Dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain
  • Cough, hemoptysis, syncope
  • Signs
  • Tachypnea, tachycardia
  • JVD, loud P2, TR murmur, rales
  • Signs of DVT

8
Chest Radiograph
9
Electrocardiogram
10
Oxygenation
  • Pulse Oximetry (SpO2)
  • Normal SpO2 does not exclude PE
  • Interpret with RR
  • ABG
  • ? pO2 ? pCO2
  • Increased A-a gradient

11
Risk Stratification
  • Determine probability of PE
  • Low
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Overall clinical impression
  • Models/scoring systems

12
PE Probability Prediction Rule
13
D-Dimers
  • Valuable screening test
  • High sensitivity low specificity
  • Helpful only if Negative
  • Strong Negative Predictive Value-- Rules out PE
    when low probability
  • Safe, noninvasive
  • Rapid, inexpensive

14
D-Dimers
  • Available assays
  • Standard ELISA
  • Latex agglutination
  • Erythrocyte agglutination (SimpliRED)
  • Turbidimetric assay (Liatest)
  • Rapid ELISA (VIDAS)
  • Immunofiltration (NycoCard)

15
V/Q Scan
16
V/Q Lung Scan
  • Normal V/Q Sensitivity 99
  • Rules out PE
  • High Prob V/Q Specificity 96
  • Rules in PE
  • But, gt60 nondiagnostic
  • Takes gt2 hr to perform
  • Not available at all times

17
V/Q Lung Scan
PIOPED. JAMA. 1990 2632753-59
18
Ultrasound for DVT
  • Positive test
  • Inability to compress femoral or popliteal vein
  • Positive Predictive Value 97
  • Negative test
  • Full compressibility
  • Negative Predictive Value 98
  • Kearon et al. Ann Intern Med. 1998 1291044-49

19
Ultrasound and PE
  • US DVT in 30-50 with PE
  • Positive USconfirms PE
  • Negative ultrasound
  • PE less likely, but not excluded
  • Sequential ultrasound
  • Persistently negative ultrasound at 1-2 wks ? lt2
    DVT/PE at 6mos
  • Hull et al. J. Thromb 1996 35-8.

20
CT Angiogram
21
CT Angiogram
  • Benefits
  • Available
  • Direct image
  • Alternative Dx
  • Pelvic/leg veins
  • Limitations
  • IV contrast
  • Expensive
  • Patient cooperation
  • Uncertain sens/spec

22
CT Angiogram
  • Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for
    excluding clinically important PE

Goodman LR et al. Radiology 2000215535-42.
23
CT Angiogram
  • 1015 patients evaluated for PE
  • Nonrandomized, not controlled
  • Two diagnostic arms recommended
  • Substantial differences between groups
  • 285 patients with negative CT Angio
  • 22 were treated anyway
  • lt 2 risk of subsequent PE in 3 months
  • Only 70 completed 3mo f/u!

24
CT Angiogram
  • Prospective study of consecutive, nonselected
    patients in a Geneva ER included 299 with
    suspected PE
  • 39 had confirmed PE
  • High prob V/Q, US, or Angio
  • CT Sensitivity 70
  • CT Specificity 91
  • Perrier et al. Ann Intern Med. 2001 13588-97

25
CT Angiogram
  • 35 false negative on CT
  • 19 High prob V/Q
  • 12 DVT on US
  • 3 Angio
  • 1 Dx at f/u
  • CT should not be used alone for suspected PE,
    but combining tests improves accuracy and reduces
    need for angiography

26
CT Angiogram
27
CT Angiogram
  • New Systematic Review
  • 15 studies met criteria
  • VTE after negative CT Angio
  • NLR 0.07
  • NPV 99.1
  • The clinical validity of using CT to r/o PE is
    similar to that reported for pulmonary
    angiography

Quiroz R et al. JAMA 20052932012-17.
28
Two Cases of Pulmonary Embolism as Shown on
Contrast-Enhanced 16-Slice Multidetector-Row
Computed Tomography
Goldhaber, S. Z. N Engl J Med 20053521812-1814
29
Multidetector-Row CT
  • 756 consecutive pts 194 with PE
  • 82 High Prob 78/82 CT, 1 US/-CT
  • 674 Lower Prob
  • 232 neg D-dimer ? no TE
  • 109 CT
  • 318 neg dimer and CT ? 3 TE at 3mo
  • Neg CT plus Neg D-dimer 1 risk for TE at 3
    months

Perrier A et al. NEJM 20053521760-8.
30
CT Angiogram
  • My Conclusions
  • CT Angio is good and getting better
  • Its not perfect, so dont over-rely on it
  • Do additional testing if clinical suspicion is
    high
  • Neg D-dimer plus neg MDR CT may be best to
    confidently r/o PE

31
MRI/MRA
  • No radiation or contrast exposure
  • Expensive
  • Not uniformly available
  • Limited data
  • Role not established

32
Echocardiogram
33
Pulmonary Angiogram
  • Gold standard
  • 98 Sensitive
  • 97 Specific
  • Complications
  • Death 0.5
  • Major non-fatal 1
  • Minor 5

34
Diagnostic Summary
  • Determine pre-test probabilitybe selective when
    deciding to w/u
  • D-Dimers to r/o PE if low prob.
  • CT or V/Q (US first if DVT likely)
  • Bilat. LE US if V/Q non-diagnostic and/or CT neg.
    and suspicion persists
  • Then,
  • Serial US if moderate/high prob.
  • Angiogram if still high prob.

35
Treatment
36
Unfractionated Heparin
  • Weight-based dosing (nomogram)
  • IV bolus, then infusion
  • Monitor PTT (1.5-2.0 x), CBC
  • Continue ?4-5d and therapeutic on Warfarin for 2d
    (INRgt2.0)

37
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
  • Alternative regimen
  • Better bioavailability, longer half-life, more
    predictable effect
  • No monitoring of PTT (follow CBC)
  • Contraindications renal failure (CrCllt30),
    weight extremes

38
Warfarin
  • Start when therapeutic on Heparin
  • Monitor INR daily
  • Goal INR 2.0-3.0 for 3-6 months

39
Duration of anticoagulation
  • Identified precipitant 3 mos
  • First idiopathic episode 6 mos
  • Prolonged/indefinite
  • ? 2 thrombotic episodes
  • 1 spont. life-threatening episode
  • Anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, ATIII
    deficiency

40
Thrombolysis
  • Massive PE
  • Acute pulmonary hypertension
  • RV dysfunction
  • Systemic hypotension
  • All age groups benefit
  • Addition to Heparin therapy
  • Various agents appear equivalent

41
Thrombectomy
  • Surgical or transvenous (catheter)
  • When thrombolysis unsuccessful or
    contraindicated, or
  • Massive PE

42
Vena Cava Filters
  • Indications
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation
  • Recurrent PE on anticoagulation
  • Complications from anticoagulation
  • Massive PE with poor reserve
  • Problems with filter thrombosis

43
Prevention
  • Identify and minimize risk factors
  • Pneumatic compression devices
  • S.Q. Heparin
  • Unfractionated
  • Low molecular weight

44
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Hypercoagulable states

45
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Why test for hypercoagulability?
  • May affect intensity/duration of treatment
  • Family counseling about risks
  • Identify need for prophylaxis in higher risk
    situations

46
Risks of Venous Thrombosis
47
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Unprovoked thrombotic event and
  • Age lt 45 yrs
  • Recurrent event
  • Family history of thrombosis
  • Cerebral/visceral thrombosis
  • Fetal demise
  • 3 or more SABs

48
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • First unprovoked event
  • Provoked by pregnancy
  • Provoked by OCs or HRT

49
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Testing caveats
  • C, S, ATIII ? in acute thrombosis
  • Heparin interferes with ATIII, lupus
    anticoagulant, Factor VIII, and some APC
    resistance tests
  • Warfarin decreases C S

50
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Tests performed acutely
  • Leiden Factor V (APC resistance)
  • Prothrombin G20210A mutation
  • Increased homocysteine
  • Anti-cardiolipin antibodies

51
Thrombophilia evaluation
  • Consider testing later
  • Lupus anticoagulant
  • Decreased Proteins C S
  • Decreased Anti-thrombin III
  • Increased Factor VIII

52
Summary
  • Have index of suspicion for PE
  • Develop clinical probability
  • Interpret all tests in context of pre-test
    probability
  • Selectively w/u for thrombophilia
  • Choose therapy based on clinical status
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com