Philosophy of Love and Sex - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy of Love and Sex

Description:

Living off of the avails of prostitution. Maintaining a bawdy house ... For more info check out: http://www.sexwork.com/montreal/law.html. Arkes, 'Prostitution' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: chassUt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy of Love and Sex


1
Philosophy of Love and Sex
  • Prostitution

2
  • A Quick FYI
  • The following are illegal by Canadian law
  • Living off of the avails of prostitution
  • Maintaining a bawdy house
  • Public solicitation for the purposes of
    prostitution
  • Purchasing the sexual services of a minor

3
  • Until 1972
  • Everyone who commits vagrancy who, being a
    common prostitute or night-walker is found in a
    public place and does not, when required, give a
    good account of herself (S.164.1 of the Criminal
    Code)

4
Arkes, Prostitution
  • Arkes argues that contemporary law on
    prostitution shies away from moral condemnation
    of prostitution
  • The inclination has often been to ban public
    solicitation or restrict the zone of
    solicitation - to treat the problem, in other
    words, as a matter of aesthetic regulation or
    the abatement of nuisances 230

5
Arkes, Prostitution
  • Some condemn prostitution on the grounds that it
    leads to other harms to society for example, an
    increase in street crime.
  • The problem with this approach is that it would
    logically force us also to condemn things that
    dont deserve it for example, baseball games

6
Arkes, Prostitution
  • Arkes argues that both of these approaches fail
    to show what is fundamentally wrong with
    prostitution.
  • In Arkes view, prostitution is intrinsically,
    morally wrong, and any argument that would
    conclude that we should ban it, must depend on
    this insight.

7
Arkes, Prostitution
  • So what is it about prostitution that makes it
    intrinsically bad?
  • Argument A1
  • Prostitution inescapably implies that the
    intimacy of sexual intercourse need not be
    connected to any authentic sentiment of love and
    that it need not take place in a setting marked
    by the presence of commitment. In that sense it
    might be said that prostitution patronizes the
    corruption of physical love it reduces physical
    love to the kind of hydraulic action that animals
    may share, and as it does that it detaches the
    act of intercourse from the kind of love that is
    distinctly human. 233

8
Arkes, Prostitution
  • But we must be careful not to slide here into
    another empirical argument against
    prostitution we shouldnt say that the
    corruption of physical love is bad because it
    strikes at those institutions, like the family,
    which depend most importantly on the ties of
    love. 233 It is bad, rather because the
    corruption of love is intrinsically bad.

9
Arkes, Prostitution
  • O1A1 Why must all sex be confined to the
    bonds of love? Why must all sex be serious
    sex? We sometimes share food with those
    we love to strengthen the bonds of love,
    and sometimes eat casually for physical
    satisfaction alone. Why should we treat sex
    differently from food?

10
Arkes, Prostitution
  • R1O1A1 Sex may be different in ways that
    are morally significant. 235
  • More specifically
  • (i) the sexual bond is uniquely intimate,
    such that entering into it for mere physical
    or commercial purposes violates its nature
  • (ii) the connection of sex to the
    portentousness of reproduction, makes it an
    inappropriate means to mere physical or
    commercial satisfaction

11
Arkes, Prostitution
  • Of course, even if Arkes is successful in
    demonstrating that prostitution is morally wrong,
    this entails that it ought to be illegal only if
    we adopt his legal moralism
  • law arises in the most proper sense only from
    imperatives of moral standing moral propositions
    entail the existence of law because the logic of
    morals is a logic of commitment. 232
  • people have a claim to the exercise of their
    personal freedom in all of its expressions unless
    they do something that is in principle wrong, and
    it is only on the basis of a principle that the
    law may restrain that freedom. 235

12
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • Jaggar outlines three positions on prostitution
  • The Liberal position
  • The Marxist position
  • The Radical Feminist Position
  • Jaggar finds all three positions plausible, to
    some extent, but argues in favour of the radical
    feminist approach.

13
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • A. The Liberal Position
  • This position has several varieties, but they
    all argue that prostitution should be
    decriminalized.
  • They support their view by appealing to the
    classical liberal ideals of equality before the
    law, and the protection of individual rights
    through minimization of governmental interference
    in the private sphere of life.

14
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • Liberals view prostitution as a contract
    between individuals that is therefore subject to
    regulation as are other contracts, but simply to
    ensure fair trading practices.
  • Jaggar criticizes the liberal approach for it
    fails to consider that prostitution may involve
    an illegitimate sort of contract in which one of
    the parties is helpless and sells themselves
    into oppression.
  • A closely related criticism is that many
    prostitutes may not enter into their contracts
    voluntarily.

15
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • B. The Marxist Position
  • Marxists are more interested than Liberals are
    in the social context within which the practice
    of prostitution flourishes.
  • For Marxists, prostitution is bad, but it is not
    specially bad. In the Marxist analysis
    prostitution is essentially the sale of bodily
    services for a wage thus it is on par with a
    variety of services. Engel speaks of the
    general prostitution of the labourer.

16
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • Wage labour, generally, is criticized by
    Marxists for its alienating effect on the
    workers. Workers become mere appendages to
    their machines, cogs in the capitalist system.
    Thus the essential, creative human capacity to
    work is reduced and bound to an inhuman system of
    industrial production.
  • In this same system wives are reduced to baby
    machines and sexual prostitutes are mere
    commodities.

17
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • Classical Marxism seeks to abolish prostitution,
    but not by mere legal prohibition. It seeks
    rather a revolutionary overthrow of the entire
    capitalist system within which prostitution
    flourishes.
  • Prostitution, and wage labour more generally,
    are products of economic inequality, and thus can
    be eliminated only when that inequality is
    eliminated.

18
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • C. The Radical Feminist Position
  • For radical feminism (RF), prostitution is the
    archetypal relationship of women to men. That
    is, RF sees most social interaction between
    women and men as some form of prostitution.

19
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • RF agrees with Marxism both that (i) sexual
    prostitution is not bad in a special sort of way,
    but rather is one expression of a systemic
    inequality and (ii) there is economic coercion
    underlying prostitution.
  • RF differs from Marxism in its refusal to
    assimilate prostitution to other types of wage
    labour.
  • RF is distinct from liberalism in its broad
    construal of what constitutes sexual services,
    and in its denial that prostitution is a
    victimless crime.
  • RF is distinct from both Marxism and liberalism
    in that it defines prostitutes as women.

20
Jaggar, Prostitution
  • RF calls for the elimination of prostitution,
    but recognizes that this will involve the
    systemic overthrow of patriarchy.
  • Part of the solution will be the elimination of
    male demand for prostitutes, which requires us to
    abandon the conventional myth that men have
    biologically stronger appetites for sex and
    sexual diversity than do women.
  • Is this indeed a mere myth? Robert Wright, in
    Feminists, Meet Mr. Darwin will argue that it
    is not.

21
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • Arguments against prostitution
  • A1 It constitutes a case of sexual
    immorality. Society and conventional morality
    condemn it. 240
  • This is because the less a sexual practice
    has to do with the bearing and rearing of
    children, the less sanctioned it is. 240
  • O1A1 (i)An explanation of our
    antiprostitution sentiment does not constitute
    a justification of that sentiment.
  • O2A1 (ii)Prostitution neither is nor ever was
    a threat to reproduction within the nuclear
    family.Nor has it ever been a threat to the
    family itself. People marry and visit whores
    for quite different reasons.

22
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • A2 Prostitution is intrinsically wrong
    mercenary love per se is immoral.
  • O1A2 If two adults voluntarily consent to an
    economic arrangement concerning sexual
    activity and this activity takes place in
    private, it seems plainly absurd to maintain
    that there is something intrinsically wrong with
    it.To say that prostitution is intrinsically
    wrong is in a way to refuse to give any
    arguments.This terminates rational discussion
    where it should begin 241
  • (Doesnt Arkes give reasons, regarding the
    intimacy of sex, which show why prostitution is
    intrinsically bad?)

23
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • A3 Prostitution is undesirable because the
    relation between whore and customer must by the
    nature of things be a very poor relation to
    nonmercenary sex. 241
  • O1A3 (i) Simply because x is of poorer
    quality than y does not mean that x is bad.
  • O2A3 We must be careful not to romanticize
    nonmercenary sex, or excessively denigrate
    mercenary sex.

24
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • A4 Prostitution involves the selling of
    something too basic to human life to be sold.
  • O1A4 There is on this ground no more reason
    to despise the sex market and those engaged in
    it than to despise the food market and those
    engaged in it. 243

25
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • A5 Prostitution is wrong because it
    constitutes an extreme instance of the
    inequality of the sexes. 244
  • Gives an extramarital outlet for men, and not
    women
  • Relation of prostitute to customer is one of
    object to subject
  • The prostitutes job is solely to satisfy the
    man she is thus simply a means to an end
  • Prostitution reduces woman to a piece of
    merchandise she is thus objectified and
    economically exploited

26
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • O1A5 (i) If it is wrong that prostitution is
    available only to men, the way to redress
    this is to make it more available to women,
    should they desire it.
  • (ii) There are many male prostitutes thus it
    is not, as a whole, specially oppressive for
    women.
  • (iii)The perils of prostitution call for reform
    to its regulation, not banning it.

27
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • (iv) Prostitutes arent subject to special
    economic exploitation many occupations
    involve selling bodily services for money.
    Moreover, many prostitutes are better thought
    of more as entrepreneurs than as sex slaves.
  • (v) Treating a prostitute as a mere means to
    an end, without regard for her personhood, is
    not specially exploitative. Furthermore, being
    primarily interested, when visiting a
    professional, in their professional
    performance, is not equivalent to dehumanizing
    them.

28
Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution
  • (vi) Prostitutes also often see their customers
    as a mere means to an end.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com