Mechanical System Verification LVDT Calibration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Mechanical System Verification LVDT Calibration

Description:

Check laboratory documentation to determine last NIST traceable calibration. Acceptance Criteria ... How to Conduct the Mr Startup Procedure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:266
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: jonathan128
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mechanical System Verification LVDT Calibration


1
Mechanical System VerificationLVDT Calibration
  • Use NIST traceable micrometer
  • Eight point calibration
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Near zero intercept
  • R-squared gt 0.99

2
Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell Zero
  • Use strain indicator
  • Measure load cell zero reading
  • Used to determine if load cell has been fatigued
    or overstrained
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Zero reading lt 1.5
  • of full-scale sensitivity

3
Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell
Calibration Certificates
  • Check laboratory documentation to determine last
    NIST traceable calibration
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • NIST traceable calibration
  • within one year

4
Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell
Calibration Verification
  • Requires NIST traceable proving rings
  • Utilizes static loading
  • Verifies load cell calibration
  • Measures unwanted friction
  • Measures unwanted bending and deflections

5
Mechanical System Verification Load Cell
Calibration Verification
  • Procedure
  • Apply static (ramp) load from 10 - 90 of proving
    ring capacity _at_ 10 intervals
  • Register load cell/LVDT readings with data
    acquisition system
  • Read dial gauge on proving ring

6
Mechanical System Verification Load Cell
Calibration Verification
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Proving ring versus load cell value within 5
    of each other
  • Proving ring dial gauge versus LVDT reading
    within 5 of each other

7
Mechanical System VerificationDynamic Response
  • Verify overall equipment ability to conduct
    Resilient Modulus testing
  • Verify data acquisition process
  • Verify data format

8
Mechanical System Verification Dynamic Response
  • Procedure
  • Remove dial gauge from proving ring
  • Use external LVDTs or internally mounted LVDT for
    displacement measurements
  • Apply haversine shaped load pulse (.1 seconds on,
    .9 seconds off)

9
Mechanical System Verification Dynamic Response
  • Procedure (continued)
  • Apply dynamic load from 10 - 90 of proving ring
    capacity _at_ 10 intervals
  • Read deformation using data acquisition system

10
Mechanical System Verification Dynamic Response
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Generated haversine close to ideal
  • Deformation response close to haversine
  • Deformation within 5 of standard
  • R-square gt 0.99
  • .002 second or less phase shift between load and
    deformation
  • Ymax/Ymin lt 1.10 (10)

11
Mechanical System VerificationPhase Angles
  • Dynamic sinusoidal tests
  • Verify overall system electronics (phase angle
    measurements)
  • Detect misalignment problems through the use of
    phase angle measurements
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Phase angle lt 2.8 degrees

12
Mechanical System VerificationTriaxial Pressure
Chamber
  • Procedure
  • Use autonomous pressure reading device to verify
    pressure
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Gauge readings 2.5 of target values
  • Hold for 10 minutes

13
The 3-Phase Startup Process
  • Verification of Electronic System
  • Verification of Mechanical System
  • Verification of Laboratory Ability to Conduct P46
    Resilient Modulus Test

14
Laboratory Proficiency Testing
  • Focuses on laboratory ability (personnel/equipment
    )
  • Sample preparation
  • Operators ability to conduct a test
  • Proper sequence and magnitude of loading
  • Proper data format
  • Analysis of raw data to detect any discrepancies
  • Investigation of within and between laboratory
    variability

15
Laboratory Proficiency Testing
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Vertical deformations within 30
  • Approval by Representative based on visual
    observations
  • Conformance to all aspects of the protocol
  • Haversine wave form close to ideal
  • Deformation response reasonable
  • Resilient Modulus relationship reasonable

16
PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES
  • What is the Resilient Modulus (Mr) Startup
    Procedure Product Line
  • Why Mr Testing and the Startup Procedure is
    Important
  • Development of the Mr Startup Procedure
  • How to Conduct the Mr Startup Procedure
  • How to Get Information on the Mr Testing and
    Startup Product Line

Who Should Use the Mr Testing and Startup Product
Line and Why
17
Who Should Use the Product?
  • Any organization performing resilient modulus
    testing
  • State DOTs
  • Universities
  • Consultant laboratories
  • Can be used for other tests as well
  • Complex modulus
  • Creep compliance
  • Indirect tensile testing, etc.

18
When Should Product Be Used?
  • General
  • Prior to starting a testing program
  • Every year during production testing
  • After a period of system inactivity
  • Other recommendations
  • Verify the operation of older machines for new
    applications
  • When equipment is replaced
  • When equipment is moved
  • Whenever a suspected overload or malfunction
    occurs

19
Uncover and Avoid Problems Electronics
  • Over-ranged load cell
  • Inadequate filters
  • Amplitude roll off 2 Hz - 50 Hz
  • Unmatched filters
  • Excessive time delay (phase angle) between
    channels
  • Filters on and off

20
Uncover And Avoid Problems Software
  • Software not controlling the load adequately
  • Inadequate sampling rate
  • Raw data with no units
  • Automatic gain control, error range too big
  • Lack of gain control adjustment during testing
  • Improper raw data format - command values were
    saved rather than the feedback values

21
Uncover And Avoid Problems Mechanical
  • System not fast enough to apply proper haversine
    loads - complete upgrade of signal conditioning
    and control
  • Oversize servo-value
  • Friction in servo-value piston
  • Friction in triaxial cell seals
  • Misalignment caused by improperly designed
    triaxial cell fixture
  • Excessive deformation, up to 76 of total
    deformation due to bending of triaxial cell base
    plate

22
Uncover And Avoid Problems Mechanical
(continued)
  • Excessive deformation due to unrestrained
    triaxial cell
  • Slippage of LVDT holders
  • Lack of control of pressure transducer
  • Malfunction of air pressure regulator

23
Benefits of Use
  • Provides guidelines for standardization of test
    process
  • Provides a benchmark performance standard for
    equipment
  • Minimizes equipment and operator variability
  • Promotes greater confidence in resilient modulus
    testing and resulting pavement design

24
Current Status of Product
  • P46 test procedure established
  • Videos produced and distributed
  • Startup procedure published
  • Startup procedures completed
  • FHWA
  • Kansas
  • North Carolina
  • Minnesota
  • University of Rhode Island
  • Consultant laboratories

25
PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES
  • What is the Resilient Modulus (Mr) Startup
    Procedure Product Line
  • Why Mr Testing and the Startup Procedure is
    Important
  • Development of the Mr Startup Procedure
  • How to Conduct the Mr Startup Procedure
  • Who Should Use the Mr Startup Procedure and Why

How to Get Information on the Mr Startup
Procedure?
26
Get and Use Mr Testing and Startup Procedure
Product Line
  • Download procedure manuals from
  • LTPP homepage at www.tfhrc.gov
  • Order procedure manuals/videos
  • Through LTPP homepage
  • Through LTPP customer service
  • (Tel Number 865-481-2967)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com