Title: MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS ADE
1(No Transcript)
2Content of report
- BACKGROUND
- METHODOLOGY SAMPLE SPECIFICATIONS
- THE SURVEY QUESTIONS
- SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS
- PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS
3BACKGROUND
4Background
- Action for Global Health commissioned a survey in
five countries where Action for Global Health is
based (Spain, Italy, France, Germany and the UK)
to evaluate citizens views on providing health
aid to developing countries. - The overall mission of Action for Global Health
is to monitor how the actions and policies of
European governments affect health in developing
countries and to influence decision-makers to
improve their practice.
5- B. METHODOLOGY SAMPLE SPECIFICATIONS
6Methodology
- Representative samples of 1000 respondents aged
18 and over in each of the 5 countries - TRENDSbus omnibus survey using Computer-Assisted
Telephone interviewing - Fieldwork in August 2008
- 4890 interviews achieved
- Data weighted by gender, age and region within a
country and proportionally to the 18 population
in a country for the total results
7Weighted sample distribution
8 9The survey questions
QB1 These questions relate to support to
developing countries, which are the poorest
countries in the world where economic and social
development is a long way behind (NATION).
Improving health in developing countries is one
way of supporting these countries. By this, we
mean action to reduce child mortality, to reduce
mothers mortality (number of women who die as a
result of childbirth or during pregnancy), and
the fight against diseases such as HIV and AIDS,
tuberculosis and malaria. In your opinion, does
the (NATIONALITY) government allocate too much,
too little or about the right proportion of its
money to helping to improve health in developing
countries? Even if you do not know the amount,
please answer based on your general
impression. QB2 Please say to what extent you
agree or disagree with the following statement
One of the main targets of the European Union's
support FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES should be
improving health so that people are fit to work
and thereby reduce poverty in the long term. Do
you strongly agree, tend to agree, tend to
disagree or strongly disagree with this
statement? QB3 Would you say that help for
developing countries is more efficient if it is
provided by each European government separately
or if it is combined and coordinated through the
European Union?
10- D. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS
A. SUMMARY
11Summary of the findings
- ALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT MONEY
- Although overall the majority view is that
governments allocate about the right amount of
money to helping to improve health in developing
countries (43), there is considerable support
for more spending as 38 of respondents feel that
their government allocates too little money. - Public opinion in the five EU donor countries
differs strongly. In Italy, which spends the
smallest proportion of its gross national income
on development aid, over half of the respondents
feel their government allocates too little money
(51). In Germany, only a quarter of respondents
share this view. - Young people (and those who are still studying)
far more often than other socio-demographic
groups hold the view that their government spends
too little (53). - IMPROVING HEALTH SHOULD BE ONE OF THE MAIN
TARGETS OF EU SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES - In all the countries surveyed and among all the
socio-demographic groups examined there is
widespread agreement that improving health should
be one of the main targets of EU support for
developing countries. On average, 86 of
respondents agree. - ORGANISING HELP FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
- Citizens in all five countries broadly support
the opinion that help for developing countries is
more efficient if it is combined and coordinated
through the European Union (79). There is also
widespread agreement with this opinion among the
different socio-demographic groups that the
survey identifies.
12- E. PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS
13Nearly 4 out of 10 citizens find that their
government allocates too little money to helping
improve health in developing countries
QB1 In your opinion, does the (NATIONALITY)
government allocate too much, too little or about
the right proportion of its money to helping to
improve health in developing countries? Even if
you do not know the amount, please answer based
on your general impression.
14In this regard, public opinion differs at country
level
15Opinions and reality
- Opinion Italian respondents most often feel
that their government spends too little (51)
Reality their government has the lowest
allocation of development aid and further reduced
its aid from 2006 to 2007. - Opinion Close to half of Spanish respondents
seem to want more spending (46) Reality their
government has the highest of GNI spent on ODA
and in fact increased its aid between 2006 and
2007. - Opinion German respondents are most critical
about development aid Reality their government
is not the biggest spender.
16Young people stand out
- Unlike the other socio-demographic groups
examined, over half of the respondents aged 18 to
24 and those who are still studying find that
their government allocates too little money to
helping to improve health in developing countries
(both 53).
17The survey reveals widespread agreement that
improving health should be one of the main
targets of the EUs support for developing
countries
QB2 Please say to what extent you agree or
disagree with the following statement One of the
main targets of the European Union's support FOR
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES should be improving health
so that people are fit to work and thereby reduce
poverty in the long term. Do you strongly agree,
tend to agree, tend to disagree or strongly
disagree with this statement?
18Agreement that improving health should be one of
the main targets of the EUs support for
developing countries is widespread in all 5
countries
- Public opinion is particularly outspoken in
Spain, where more than half of the respondents
strongly agree (56). - The strength of support is such that the lowest
national agreement levels are 82 (for Germany)
and 83 (for France).
19Equally, there is broad consensus about the main
targets among the socio-demographic groups
examined
- It is perhaps interesting to note that agreement
is highest among the oldest age category and
among citizens who ended their education before
reaching age 16 (both 89).
20The survey reveals broad support for combining
and coordinating help for developing countries
through the European Union
21Notwithstanding some variation, support for
EU-coordinated aid is widespread in all the
countries and among all the socio-demographic
groups examined
22Vision, Public Opinion Reality
VISION Since November 2005, a common vision of
development by the Member States of the EU and
the EC has existed. The European Consensus on
Development provides a framework to support
developing countries in their poverty reduction
strategies, including building up health systems
and support for capacity-building programmes and
initiatives for democracy and good governance. It
also built upon an earlier agreement for a
timetable to increase European states aid.
(Source Action for Global Health, Report Two,
June 2008)
Public opinion The survey highlights that the
public supports this vision. The results of the
survey can be used to convince European Leaders
to change current reality
- REALITY
- EU Member States still prefer bilateral relations
with developing countries, illustrated in many of
the case studies in this report. They seem to
prefer their own technical advisers, their own
funding priorities and have a varied approach to
the major global health partnerships, on the one
hand, and sector and budget support on the other.
This continued reliance on bilateral agreements
presents the primary challenge for improving the
effectiveness of European health aid. (Source
Action for Global Health, Report Two, June 2008)