Title: Need for Fundamental Channel Change
1Need for Fundamental Channel Change
- Focusing Resources in 2009 for Channel
Effectiveness
2Pain of the channel (and the chief)
- Few channel organizations have ability to
demonstrate their value add to the organization. - They dont know whats working and what isnt
- It is unacceptable at any time, but particularly
now to have /- 50 of gross revenue at risk and
unpredictable - This places vendor stability, budgets, programs
and channel jobs at risk
3Hypothesis Too Focused on Efficiency
- Characteristics of Internal Efficiency Focus
- Focused on automation and removing costs
- Not revenue focused
- Doesnt require exec team buy-in or review
because - Typically little or no enterprise visibility or
impact - The default focus of most channel organizations
- Typical Internal Efficiency Focused Programs
- Recruiting more partners
- Updating partner portal
- Delivering a partner satisfaction survey
- Rebuilding partner database
- Creating an MDF program
- Building a chat room
- Adding a new level to your partner program
- Rebuilding your partner training program
4The Survey
- Targeted Top Channel Executive
- Average Channel 1,000 Resellers
- Channel contribution - over 50
- Across six industries
Source SiriusDecisions
5Channels more important than ever to revenue
Partners bring more revenue to the table
Combined Increased 61.1
Partners get more spend from vendors
Combined Increased 69.5
6Channel Executives Want Change
- Growth engine
- Competitive asset
- Strategic asset
- Revenue generating machine
- Driving incremental deals
- Mission critical to the business
7But Dont Always Know How to Make That Actionable
- Are stuck in operational efficiency investments
- 4 of the top 5 planned technology investments for
2009 are infrastructure, administration and
operational - Training/Learning Management Systems
- Partner Communications / Blogging
- Partner Content Portals
- MDF/Co-Op Management
- And think adding more partners to the mix is the
answer - 23 said that Recruiting more partners in
existing markets is their number 1 goal for their
channel organization during the next 12 to 24
months - Could you imagine the VP of Direct Sales saying
that this was his plan for 2009?
8Two Clusters of Respondents
9Its (also) About The Partner
- Partners (generally) dont benefit from vendor
investments in recruitment - The path to revenue from new partners is too long
to influence 2009 Revenues - Better enabling existing partners is a much more
effective approach - Partners dont benefit from vendor efficiency
- Hold partners accountable while investing in them
10Conclusions
- Clear groupings with Effectiveness or Efficiency
focus - Too many channel chiefs engaged in the same (old)
low-risk, low-return internal efficiency
activities - Too few channel chiefs are ready to drive
fundamental changes that - enable greater impact and equality with direct
sales - increase visibility
- increase empowerment and
- increase accountability in the channel
- If the goal is to increase revenue, then peers
are spending the majority of time on - Lead Management
- Deal Registration
- Reporting and accountability
- Its not too late to make a difference in 2009
11Recommendations for 2009 Impact
- Measure every Partner, Lead and Opportunity KPI
- Improve Lead Management
- Generate high quality leads
- Ensure leads are delivered rapidly
- Ensure leads get to the right partner every time
- Increase CAM effectiveness
- Protect partners from channel conflict
- Help partners accelerate sales cycles and close
deals - Selling guidance and coaching
- Contextual product information
12Appendix
13Appendix A - Selected Survey Data Elements
Survey Execution Dates September 15 26,
2008
14Demographic Data
15Demographic Data
16Planned Future (12 month) Investments
17Priorities for the coming 12 months
18Vendor / Partner Reporting Interactions
19Resource Allocations
20Partner Contribution () of Total Vendor Revenue