Title: Unmanned Aircraft Systems UAS Standards Development and Application
1Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)Standards
Development and Application
- Mike Fagan
- SRA International
- mike_fagan_at_sra.com
- www.uavforum.com
2ASTM Committee F38
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Formed 2003
- Members 180
- Subcommittees
- Airworthiness
- Operations
- Training and Certification
3Topics
- UAS challenges
- UAS standards that enable solutions
- Representative standards-developing organizations
(SDOs)
4Commercial UAS Challenges
- Profitability
- Insurability
- Regulation
- Reliability
5Solution DependenciesFollow the Money
- Commercial UAS success requires a profitable
return on investment--- - which implies risk management and mitigation that
usually results in transferring risks to
insurers--- - who want safety and predictability.
- Insureds are required to adhere to regulations
and standards in order to minimize losses and
keep them within predictable (reliable) bounds. - UAS reliability improves and becomes more
predictable when relevant standards are applied. - Safety (risk management) is essential to profit.
-
6UAS Reliability
- Latest DoD UAS Reliability Study
- http//www.acq.osd.mil/uas/docs/reliabilitystudy.p
df - Update begins November, 2005
7UAS Regulatory Authority
- 14 CFR 1.1 Aircraft means a device that is used
or intended to be used for flight in the air. - FAA POLICY 05-01 defines UA, and with FAA Order
7610.4, addresses military UAS operations. - Military aircraft (generally) are certified by
the military. - Civil aircraft (generally) are certified by the
FAA. - FAA will not accept Certificate of Authorization
(COA) applications for civil UA operations.
8FAA Regulatory Area Examples
- Design
-
- Manufacturing
-
- Continuing Maintenance
-
- Operations
-
- Training and Certification
9Sources and Application of Regs
- 14 CFR full regulatory treatment
- e.g. air carriers, flight schools
- 14 CFR based on consensus standards
- e.g. light sport aircraft
- 14 CFR minimal regulatory treatment
- e.g. ultralight vehicles
- No CFR addressed by exception
- e.g. kites, model aircraft, rockets
10What is a Consensus Standard?
- standards developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies, both domestic and
international - "Voluntary consensus standards bodies" are
domestic or international organizations which
plan, develop, establish, or coordinate voluntary
consensus standards using agreed-upon procedures.
For purposes of this Circular, "voluntary,
private sector, consensus standards bodies," as
cited in Act, is an equivalent term. The Act and
the Circular encourage the participation of
federal representatives in these bodies to
increase the likelihood that the standards they
develop will meet both public and private sector
needs. A voluntary consensus standards body is
defined by the following attributes - Openness
- Balance of interest
- Due process
- An appeals process.
From OMB Circular No. A-119, "Federal
Participation in the Development and Use of
Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity
Assessment Activities."
11Consensus Standardsand Public Policy
- OMB Circular A-119, 20 Oct 1993 (revised 10 Feb
1998) establishes policy for federal use of
standards - All federal agencies must use
voluntary consensus standards in lieu of
government-unique standards in their procurement
and regulatory activities - Public Law 104-113, National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995, eliminates practice
of having duplicative government standards
12F38 Preceptive Relationshipsof UAS Standards
Model Aircraft
e.g. Global Hawk
Voluntary Standards
Mandatory Consensus Standards
Mandatory Federal Standards
13ASTMs Approach for UAS Standards
- Goal Produce cost-effective consensus standards
that, when applied, will enhance the safe design,
manufacture, maintenance, and operation of
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). - Define terms and scope of UAS standards
- Adopt current, safe practices and guidance as
formal UAS standards - Develop additional UAS standards as needed
- Maintain currency and relevancy of standards
14Standards Today
- UA Definitions
- AIAA R-103-2004, Terminology for Unmanned Aerial
Vehicles and Remotely Operated Aircraft - ASTM F2395, Standard Terminology for Unmanned Air
Vehicle Systems - See Avoid Systems
- ASTM F2411, Standard Specification for Design and
Performance Requirements for an Unmanned Air
Vehicle Sense-and-Avoid System
15GA Mid-Air Collision Statistics
Source AOPA Air Safety Foundation
16UAV SA Reliability
- Reliability e-(?t) where
- ? is the failure rate of the system
(useful life with a constant hazard
function) - t is time system is in service
- The reliability of a non-cooperative UAV
sense-and-avoid system operating with general
aviation would be (at a minimum) equivalent to
that provided by the manned system -
- Butthis reliability figure encompasses
- Probability of detection
- Scan rate/location
- System availability
- Component reliability and redundancy
- Operating procedures
- Operating environment
R e-(8.57 x10 )(2.5) 0.9999786
-6
17MARCAT Example
18Selected ASTM F38 Work Products
- Standard Guide for Mini-UAV Airworthiness
- Recommended Practices for Unmanned Aircraft
System Design, Manufacture And Test - Standard Specification for Design and Performance
of an Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) Data Link System
- FAR Part 21 Review For Civil Unmanned Aircraft
(CUA) Requirements - FAR Part 27 Review For Civil Unmanned Rotorcraft
(CUR) Requirements - Quality Assurance in the Manufacture of Unmanned
Airplane Systems (UAS) - Continued Operational Safety Monitoring of the
Light Unmanned Airplane Systems (UAS) - Standard Practice for Maintenance and the
Development of Maintenance Manuals for Light
Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) - UAV Embedded Software
- Standard Practice for Design and Manufacture of
Reciprocating Engines for Unmanned Aircraft
Systems - Standard Specification for the Design and
Performance of a Pneumatic UAS Launch System
19STANDARDS-DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONS (SDOs)
20ANSI Accredited SDOs
- Representative American National Standards
Institute (ANSI)-Accredited Standards-Developing
Organizations (200 total) - American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (AIAA) - ASTM International
- Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE) - Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
21SDO Comparison
22ASTM F38 Liaison Program
- F38 Liaison Program Objectives
- Share the nature and status of each
organizations workflow - Identify areas of potential cross referencing
- Identify and reduce areas of overlap /
duplication - Identify areas of potential cooperation and joint
meetings - Maintain knowledge of key contacts in the
organizations - Initial organizations
- AIAA, AOPA, RTCA, SAE
23Industry Contributions to Standards
- Standards-Developing Organizations (SDOs)
generally rely on industry, government, and users
to identify a need for standards, and then
develop the standards. - Existing production and test specifications are
excellent candidates for ANSI SDO approved
standards. - Semi-annual F38 meeting is Nov 7 8 in Dallas.
24The identification, development, acceptance, and
use of standardsare necessary prerequisites for
routine operations of UAS
25(No Transcript)