Title: Is the Old Testament Historically Reliable
1Is the Old Testament Historically Reliable?
2Old Testament has shown to be historically
reliable through
- Textual transmission the accuracy of the
process of copying the manuscripts through
history - The confirmation of the Old Testament by hard
evidence uncovered through archaeology - Documentary evidence also uncovered through
archaeology. - Testimony of the Authenticity of the Old
Testament through Jesus.
3Bibliographical Evidence
- Number of Manuscripts and the closeness to
original date of authorship of the existent
Manuscripts do match the N.T. - Sheer age of the text and the inability of
writing material to survive. - The loss of manuscripts during the destruction of
Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
4Bibliographical Evidence
- Jewish commitment to the text
- Romans 31, 2 What advantage then hath the Jew?
or what profit is there of circumcision? Much
every way chiefly, because that unto them were
committed the oracles of God.
5Jewish Commitment to the Text
- Josephus We have given practical proof of our
reverence for our own Scriptures. For, although
such long ages have now passed, no one has
ventured either to add, or to remove or to alter
a syllable and it is an instinct with every Jew,
from the day of his birth, to regard them as the
decrees of God, to abide by them, and if need be,
cheerfully to die for them
6Jewish Commitment to the Text
- Rabbi Aquiba (Jewish Scribe in the 2nd century
A.D) the accurate transmission of the text is a
fence for the Torah.
7Jewish Caretakers of the Old Testament Text
- Sopherim scribes Jewish scholars and
custodians of the text between 5th-3rd B.C. - The Zugoth pairs textual scholars 2nd-1st
century BC - Tannaim repeaters or teachers 1st century BC-AD
200 work also included the Talmud - Talmudists (A.D.100-500)
8Talmudists
- A synagogue roll must be written on the skins of
clean animals - Prepare for the particular use of the synagogue
by a Jew. - Must be fastened together with strings taken from
clean animals - Every skin must contain a certain number of
columns, equal throughout the entire codex
9Talmudists
- The length of each column must not extend less
than 48 or more than 60 lines, the breadth must
consist of thirty letters - The ink should be black and be prepared
according to a definite recipe - An authentic copy must be the exemplar, from
which the transcriber ought not in the least
deviate
10Talmudists
- No word or letter must be written from memory
- Between every consonant the space of a hair or
thread must intervene - The copyist must be in full Jewish dress and have
cleansed his whole body - Not begin to write the name of God with a pen
newly dipped in ink - Should a king address him while writing the name
of God he must not take notice.
11Talmudists
- Once a manuscript had been copied with the
exactitude prescribed by the Talmud and been
verified it was accepted as being equal to the
original
12Jewish Caretakers of the Old Testament Text
- Masoretes Jewish scholars between A.D 500 A.D.
950 - Two major centers of Masoretic activity (one in
Babylon, the other in Palestine - Most famous Masoretes were the ben Asher family
(Tiberias) who produced the ben Asher text that
is considered the standard Hebrew text of today
13Masoretes
- Use of vowel points
- Introduced an extensive system of multiple levels
of section, paragraph, and phrasal divisions that
were indicated in Masoretic markings. - One of the most frequent of these was a special
type of punctuation, for a full stop used to help
mark verse numbers later on.
14Masoretes
- Numbered the verses, words, and letters of very
book. - They calculated the middle word and middle letter
of each verse. - Pointed out the middle letter of the Pentateuch
and the middle letter of the whole Hebrew Bible.
15Note about Age
- Age was not seen as advantage when determining
the authenticity of a Scribe. - On the contrary it was seen as disadvantage as
older copies where viewed as more susceptible to
damage. - Older copies placed in a lumber cupboard in the
Synagogue. Once the cupboard was filled the
oldest copies where destroyed
16Note about Age
- Paleographer Sir Frederic Kenyon Thus far from
regarding an older copy of the Scriptures as more
valuable, the Jewish habit has been to prefer the
newer as being the most perfect and free from
damage
17Number of Hebrew Manuscripts
- 1780 Benjamin Kennicott numbered and published
the list of existent Hebrew Manuscripts as 615 - 1788 Giovanni de Rossi published a list of 731
Hebrew Manuscripts
18Number of Hebrew Manuscripts
- 1890s Cairo Synagogue 200,000 Manuscripts and
fragments (10,000 which are biblical) - Dated 6th-8th Century. Attic had been walled off
and forgotten - Half of the Cairo manuscripts are housed at
Cambridge University -- The rest are scattered
across the world (A number of the larger
manuscripts are in New York in the Jewish
Theological Seminary)
19Number of Hebrew Manuscripts
- When you add the Dead Sea Scrolls the total
number of manuscripts of known Old Testament
Manuscripts and fragments rises to well above
11,000
20Famous Manuscripts
- Cairo Codex (A.D. 895) Located in the British
Museum. Produced by the Moses ben Asher family
contains all the Prophets (but none of the rest
of the O.T.) - Codex of the Prophets of Leningrad (A.D. 915)
contains Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the
twelve minor profits - Codex Babylonicus Petropalitanus (A.D. 1008)
also located in Leningrad. Earliest complete
copy of the Masoretic text. It was prepared from
a corrected text of Rabbi Aaron ben Moses ben
Asher A.D. 1000
21Famous Manuscripts
- British Museum codex (A.D. 950) contains part of
Genesis through Deuteronomy - Aleppo Codex (A.D. 900)
- The consonants in the Codex were copied by the a
Jewish scribe in Israel. The text was then
verified, vocalized, and provided with Masoretic
notes by Aaron ben Asher. - It was partially destroyed (including all of the
Pentateuch in the 1947 Arab riots in Israel after
the announcement of the UN Partition Plan. - Before its partial distruction it was the oldest
complete Masoretic manuscript of the entire O.T.
22Dead Sea Scrolls
- Sir Frederic Kenyon (textual scholar) wrote in
his book Our Bible and Ancient Manuscripts
There is indeed no probablility that we shall
find manuscripts of the Hebrew text going back to
a period before the formation of the text which
we know as Masoretic. We can only arrive at an
idea of it by a study of the earliest
translations made from it.
23Dead Sea Scrolls
- Found by a shepherd boy named Muhammed who was
searching for a lost goat, He tossed a stone
into a hole in a cliff on the west side of the
Dead Sea about 8 miles south of Jericho. The boy
heard the sound of shattering pottery. - 5 of the scrolls found in what is now known as
cave 1 were purchased by the Archbishop of the
Syrian Orthodox Moastery at Jeruslaem. Three
other scrolls where purchased by Professor
Sukenik of Hebrew Univeristy.
24Dead Sea Scrolls
- The Archbishop could not read Hebrew so he called
the American School of Oriental Research in
Jerusalem and the acting director of the school
named John Trever photograph each colomn of what
turned out to be the Isaiah scroll and sent the
prints to Dr. W. F. Albright of John Hopkins
University.
25Dead Sea Scrolls
- Albright wrote, My heartiest congratulations on
the greatest manuscript discovery of modern
times!...What an absolutely incredible find! And
there can happily not be the slightest doubt in
the world about the genuineness of the
manuscript. He dated it at 100 B.C.
26Possible Origin
- Sect known as the Essenes who lived in Kirbet
Qumran - Belief is that they hid the scrolls in the caves
around A.D. 66 before the first Jewish Revolt
27Value of the Dead Sea Scrolls
- They are dated about 1000 years earlier then the
earliest Masoretic manuscripts. - When word of the dead sea scrolls came out there
where many who assumed that a dramatic correction
of the Old Testament text would need to follow.
However, the consistency of the Dead Seas scrolls
with the Maseretic proved to be astonishing.
28Value of the Dead Sea Scrolls
- Dr Miller Burrows (Yale Univ)Considering what
a long time intervened between the Dead Sea
Scrolls and the oldest of the medieval mss. one
might have expected a much larger number of
variant readings and a much wider degree of
divergence. It is a matter for wonder that
through something like a thousand years the text
underwent so little alteration. As I said in my
first article on the scroll Herein lies its
chief importance supporting the fidelity of the
Masoretic tradition.
29Dr Yadin
- What is astonishing is that despite their
antiquity and the fact that the scrolls belong to
this pre-standardization period they are, on the
whole, almost identical with the Masoretic text
known to us. This establishes a basic principle
for all future research on texts of the Bible.
Not even the hundreds of slight variations
established in the texts, affecting mainly
spelling and occasionally word substitution, can
alter that fact.
30What do the scrolls contain?
- Cave 1 (1947)
- Isaiah (entire copy125 B.C.), Partial copies of
Genesis, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Judges, Samuel,
Ezekiel, Psalms, as well as some extra-biblical
texts - Cave 2 (1952)
- Partial copies of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,
Deuteronomy, Jeremiah, Job, Psalms, Ruth
31What do the scrolls contain?
- Cave 3
- No Biblical writings
- Cave 4 (1952)
- Thousand of fragments from all the Old Testament
books with the exception of Esther (Fragment of
Samuel dated to 3rd Century BC thought to be the
oldest known piece of the Bible)
32What do the scrolls contain?
- Cave 5-6 no significant Old Testament finds
- Cave 7-10 no significant Old Testament finds
- New Testament Find (Greek Text)? -- Jesuit
paleographer Jose OCallahan believes he found
some very early fragments of Mark (A.D. 50), Acts
(A.D. 60), Romans, 1 Timothy, 2 Peter, James (AD
70) - Mark 652, 53 fragment pictured
33(No Transcript)
34Other Early Manuscripts
- Nash Papyrus acquired in Egypt by W. L. Nash had
been dated in the 2nd century B.C. Contains
parts of Exodus including the 10 Commandments.
Agrees with the Masoretic text - Jeremiah SealBitumen seal of a wine jar Jeremiah
4811 agrees with the Masoretic text (Date
1st-2nd Century B.C.
35(No Transcript)
36Non-Hebrew evidence
- Septuagint (3rd 1st Century B.C.)
- Letter was found indicating that King Ptolemy had
an interest in Jewish literature and sent a
delegation to the Jewish high priest Eleazar in
Jerusalem. - The high priest choose 6 elders from each of the
twelve tribes of Israel and sent them to
Alexandria along with an authenticated copy of
the Torah. - The elders then took up residence in a house on
the island of Pharos where in seventy two days
they finished the translation of the Pentateuch
into Greek
37Septuagint
- Differs from the Hebrew canon in quality of
translation and was intended to be used in public
services in the synagogues rather than for
scholarly or scribble purposes - The text of Job in the original Septuagint was
one-sixth shorter then the Hebrew text. - Large variations in Joshua, Samuel, Kings,
Proverbs, Esther, and Jeremiah
38Contributions of the Septuagint
- Bridged the religious gap between the Hebrew and
Greek speaking peoples, as it met the needs of
the Alexandrian Jews - Bridged the gap between the Hebrew Old Testament
of the Jews and the Greek-speaking Christians who
would use it with the New Testament
39Contributions of the Septuagint
- Provided a precedent for missionaries to make
translations of the Scriptures into various
languages - Bridges the textual criticism gap by its
substantial agreement with the Hebrew Old
Testament. - Codex Vaticanus (A.D. 325-350)
- Codex Sinaiticus (A.D. 350)
40Samaritan Pentateuch
- When the Samaritans separated from the Jews
during the 5th -4th century B.C. they took with
them the Pentateuch as it existed - Referred to by Eusebius and Jerome but not made
available to modern western scholars until 1616
when a Samaritan manuscript was discovered in
Damascus.
41Samaritan Pentateuch
- Earliest copies are from the 11th century
- There are approximately 6000 deviations from the
Masoretic Text though most of them are considered
trivial.