Static or SimultaneousMove Games of Complete Information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Static or SimultaneousMove Games of Complete Information

Description:

Theorem 1: illustration. Player 1: EU1(H, (0.5, 0.5)) = 0.5 (-1) 0.5 1=0 ... Theorem 1: illustration. Pat. Battle of sexes. 1 , 2. 0 , 0. Prize Fight (2/3) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: xinmi3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Static or SimultaneousMove Games of Complete Information


1
Static (or Simultaneous-Move) Games of Complete
Information
  • Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium

2
Battle of Sexes
  • Chris expected payoff of playing Opera 2q
  • Chris expected payoff of playing Prize Fight
    1-q
  • Chris best response B1(q)
  • Prize Fight (r0) if qlt1/3
  • Opera (r1) if qgt1/3
  • Any mixed strategy (0?r?1) if q1/3

3
Battle of sexes
  • Pats expected payoff of playing Opera r
  • Pats expected payoff of playing Prize Fight
    2(1-r)
  • Pats best response B2(r)
  • Prize Fight (q0) if rlt2/3
  • Opera (q1) if rgt2/3
  • Any mixed strategy (0?q?1) if r2/3,

4
Battle of sexes
  • Chris best response B1(q)
  • Prize Fight (r0) if qlt1/3
  • Opera (r1) if qgt1/3
  • Any mixed strategy (0?r?1) if q1/3
  • Pats best response B2(r)
  • Prize Fight (q0) if rlt2/3
  • Opera (q1) if rgt2/3
  • Any mixed strategy (0?q?1) if r2/3

Three Nash equilibria ((1, 0), (1, 0)) ((0, 1),
(0, 1)) ((2/3, 1/3), (1/3, 2/3))
2/3
1/3
5
2-player each with two strategies
  • Theorem 1 (property of mixed Nash equilibrium)
  • A pair of mixed strategies ((r, 1-r), (q,
    1-q)) is a Nash equilibrium if and only if
    v1((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q)) ? EU1(s11, (q,
    1-q))v1((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q)) ? EU1(s12,
    (q, 1-q)) v2((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q)) ?
    EU2(s21, (r, 1-r))v2((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q))
    ? EU2(s22, (r, 1-r))

6
Theorem 1 illustration
  • Player 1
  • EU1(H, (0.5, 0.5)) 0.5(-1) 0.510
  • EU1(T, (0.5, 0.5)) 0.51 0.5(-1)0
  • v1((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5))0.5?00.5?00
  • Player 2
  • EU2(H, (0.5, 0.5)) 0.510.5(-1) 0
  • EU2(T, (0.5, 0.5)) 0.5(-1)0.51 0
  • v2((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5))0.500.500

7
Theorem 1 illustration
  • Player 1
  • v1((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) ? EU1(H, (0.5, 0.5))
  • v1((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) ? EU1(T, (0.5, 0.5))
  • Player 2
  • v2((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) ? EU2(H, (0.5, 0.5))
  • v2((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) ? EU2(T, (0.5, 0.5))
  • Hence, ((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) is a mixed
    strategy Nash equilibrium by Theorem 1.

8
Theorem 1 illustration
  • Use Theorem 1 to check whether ((2/3, 1/3),
    (1/3, 2/3)) is a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.

9
Mixed strategy equilibrium 2-player each with
two strategies
  • Theorem 2 Let ((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q)) be a
    pair of mixed strategies, where 0 ltrlt1, 0ltqlt1.
    Then ((r, 1-r), (q, 1-q)) is a mixed strategy
    Nash equilibrium if and only if
    EU1(s11, (q, 1-q)) EU1(s12, (q, 1-q))
    EU2(s21, (r, 1-r)) EU2(s22, (r, 1-r))
  • That is, each player is indifferent between her
    two pure strategies.

10
Use Theorem 2 to find mixed strategy Nash
equilibrium
  • Player 1 is indifferent between playing Head and
    Tail.
  • EU1(H, (q, 1q)) q(-1) (1q)112q
  • EU1(T, (q, 1q)) q1 (1q) (-1)2q1
  • EU1(H, (q, 1q)) EU1(T, (q, 1q)) 12q 2q1
    4q 2 This give us q 1/2

11
Use Theorem 2 to find mixed strategy Nash
equilibrium
  • Player 2 is indifferent between playing Head and
    Tail.
  • EU2(H, (r, 1r)) r 1(1r)(-1) 2r 1
  • EU2(T, (r, 1r)) r(-1)(1r)1 1 2r
  • EU2(H, (r, 1r)) EU2(T, (r, 1r)) 2r 1 1
    2r 4r 2 This give us r 1/2
  • Hence, ((0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.5)) is a mixed
    strategy Nash equilibrium by Theorem 2.

12
Use Theorem 2 to find mixed strategy Nash
equilibrium
  • Chris expected payoff of playing Opera
  • EU1(O, (q, 1q)) q2 (1q)0 2q
  • Chris expected payoff of playing Prize Fight
  • EU1(F, (q, 1q)) q0 (1q)1 1q
  • Chris is indifferent between playing Opera and
    Prize
  • EU1(O, (q, 1q)) EU1(F, (q, 1q)) 2q 1q3q
    1 This give us q 1/3

13
Use Theorem 2 to find mixed strategy Nash
equilibrium
  • Pats expected payoff of playing Opera
  • EU2(O, (r, 1r)) r 1(1r)0 r
  • Pats expected payoff of playing Prize Fight
  • EU2(F, (r, 1r)) r0(1r)2 2 2r
  • Pat is indifferent between playing Opera and
    Prize
  • EU2(O, (r, 1r)) EU2(F, (r, 1r)) r 2 2r
    3r 2 This give us r 2/3

14
Use Theorem 2 to find mixed strategy Nash
equilibrium
  • Hence, ( (2/3, 1/3), (1/3, 2/3) ) is a mixed
    strategy Nash equilibrium. That is,
  • Chris chooses Opera with probability 2/3 and
    Prize Fight with probability 1/3.
  • Pat chooses Opera with probability 1/3 and Prize
    Fight with probability 2/3.

15
Example 1
  • Bruce and Sheila determine whether to go to the
    opera or to a pro wrestling show.
  • Sheila gets utility of 4 from going to the opera
    and 1 from pro wrestling.
  • Bruce gets utility of 1 from going to the opera
    and 4 from pro wrestling.
  • They agree to decide what to do in the following
    way
  • Bruce and Sheila each puts a penny below an issue
    of the TV guide on the coffee table (assume they
    dont cheat by looking at the other). They count
    to 3 and simultaneously reveal which side of
    their penny is up. If the pennies match (both
    heads, or both tails), Sheila decides what to
    watch, while if the pennies dont match (heads,
    tails or tails, heads) then Bruce decides.

16
Example 1
  • Bruces expected payoff of playing Head
  • EU1(H, (q, 1q)) q1 (1q)4 43q
  • Bruces expected payoff of playing Tail
  • EU1(T, (q, 1q)) q4 (1q)1 13q
  • Bruce is indifferent between playing Head and
    Tail
  • EU1(H, (q, 1q)) EU1(T, (q, 1q)) 43q 13q
    6q 3 This give us q 1/2

17
Example 1
  • Sheilas expected payoff of playing Head
  • EU2(H, (r, 1r)) r 4(1r)1 3r 1
  • Sheilas expected payoff of playing Tail
  • EU2(T, (r, 1r)) r1(1r)4 4 3r
  • Sheila is indifferent between playing Head and
    Tail
  • EU2(H, (r, 1r)) EU2(T, (r, 1r)) 3r 1 4
    3r 6r 3 This give us r ½
  • ( (1/2, 1/2), (1/2, 1/2) ) is a mixed strategy
    Nash equilibrium.

18
Example 2
  • Player 1s expected payoff of playing T
  • EU1(T, (q, 1q)) q6 (1q)0 6q
  • Player 1s expected payoff of playing B
  • EU1(B, (q, 1q)) q3 (1q)6 6-3q
  • Player 1 is indifferent between playing T and B
  • EU1(T, (q, 1q)) EU1(B, (q, 1q)) 6q 6-3q
    9q 6 This give us q 2/3

19
Example 2
  • Player 2s expected payoff of playing L
  • EU2(L, (r, 1r)) r 0(1r)2 2- 2r
  • Player 2s expected payoff of playing R
  • EU2(R, (r, 1r)) r6(1r)0 6r
  • Player 2 is indifferent between playing L and R
  • EU2(L, (r, 1r)) EU2(R, (r, 1r)) 2- 2r 6r
    8r 2 This gives us r ¼
  • ( (1/4, 3/4), (2/3, 1/3) ) is a mixed strategy
    Nash equilibrium.

20
Example 3Market entry game
  • Two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, must decide whether
    to put one of their restaurants in a shopping
    mall simultaneously.
  • Each has two strategies Enter, Not Enter
  • If either firm plays Not Enter, it earns 0
    profit
  • If one plays Enter and the other plays Not
    Enter then the firm plays Enter earns 500K
  • If both plays Enter then both lose 100K
    because the demand is limited

21
Example 3Market entry game
  • How many Nash equilibria can you find?
  • Two pure strategy Nash equilibrium(Not Enter,
    Enter) and (Enter, Not Enter)
  • One mixed strategy Nash equilibrium((5/6, 1/6),
    (5/6, 1/6)) That is r5/6 and q5/6

22
Example 4
  • How many Nash equilibria can you find?
  • Two pure strategy Nash equilibrium(B, L) and
    (T, R)
  • One mixed strategy Nash equilibrium((2/3, 1/3),
    (1/2, 1/2)) That is r2/3 and q1/2

23
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • Can you guess a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium?

24
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • Check whether there is
  • a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium in which
    p11gt0, p12gt0, p13gt0, p21gt0, p22gt0, p23gt0.

25
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • If each player assigns positive probability to
    every of her/his pure strategy, then each player
    is indifferent among her three pure strategies.

26
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • Player 1 is indifferent among her/his three pure
    strategies EU1(Rock, p2) 0?p21(-1)? p221?
    p23EU1(Paper, p2) 1? p210? p22(-1)?
    p23EU1(Scissors, p2) (-1)? p211? p220? p23
  • EU1(Rock, p2) EU1(Paper, p2) EU1(Scissors, p2)
  • Together with p21 p22 p231, we have three
    equations and three unknowns.

27
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • 0?p21(-1)? p221? p23 1? p210? p22(-1)?
    p230?p21(-1)? p221? p23 (-1)? p211? p220?
    p23 p21 p22 p231
  • The solution is p21 p22 p231/3

28
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • Player 2 is indifferent among her/his three pure
    strategies EU2(Rock, p1)0?p11(-1)? p121?
    p13EU2(Paper, p1)1? p110? p12(-1)?
    p13EU2(Scissors, p1)(-1)? p111? p120? p13
  • EU2(Rock, p1) EU2(Paper, p1) EU2(Scissors,
    p1)
  • Together with p11 p12 p131, we have three
    equations and three unknowns.

29
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • 0?p11(-1)? p121? p131? p110? p12(-1)?
    p130?p11(-1)? p121? p13(-1)? p111? p120?
    p13 p11 p12 p131
  • The solution is p11 p12 p131/3

30
Example 5 Rock, paper and scissors
  • Player 1 EU1(Rock, p2) 0?(1/3)(-1)?(1/3)1?(1/
    3)0 EU1(Paper, p2) 1?(1/3)0?(1/3)(-1)?(1/3)
    0 EU1(Scissors, p2) (-1)?(1/3)1?(1/3)0?(1/3)
    0
  • Player 2 EU2(Rock, p1)0?(1/3)(-1)?(1/3)1?(1/3)
    0 EU2(Paper, p1)1?(1/3)0?(1/3)(-1)?(1/3)0
    EU2(Scissors, p1)(-1)?(1/3)1?(1/3)0?(1/3)0
  • Therefore, (p1(1/3, 1/3, 1/3), p2(1/3, 1/3,
    1/3)) is a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium by
    Theorem 4.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com