The Pileus Project: Climate Science for Decision Support - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

The Pileus Project: Climate Science for Decision Support

Description:

Tart cherries are extremely vulnerable to temperature extremes. ... region and three nearby large urban areas (Chicago, Milwaukee, and Minneapolis) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: pileu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Pileus Project: Climate Science for Decision Support


1
The Pileus Project Climate Science for Decision
Support
  • Julie Winkler
  • Michigan State University
  • February 16, 2006

Funded by the U.S. EPA
2
Pileus Project Goals
  • Identify, with stakeholder assistance, the
    influence of climate on the Michigan agriculture
    and tourism industries
  • Create empirical and physically-based models to
    quantify the impacts of past and projected
    climate variability and change on agriculture and
    tourism in Michigan.
  • Develop decision-support tools for weather and
    climate-related risk management
  • Build strong stakeholder-research partnerships

3
Pileus Project Core Team
Agriculture
Climate
Dr. Jeffrey Andresen Dr. Roy Black
Tourism
Dr. Julie Winkler Dr. Jeffrey Andresen
Tracy Beedy Costanza Zavalloni
Dr. Don Holecek Dr. Sarah Nicholls Dr. Peter
Sousounis
Galina Guentchev Krerk Piromsopa
Lori Martin Charles Shih Jeonghee Noh
Administration/Coordination/Communications Jeanne
Bisanz
4
Why call the project Pileus?
5
Why Study Climate Variability and Tart (Sour)
Cherries?
  • Tart cherries are extremely vulnerable to
    temperature extremes.
  • Tart Cherry yields are more variable than those
    for any other agricultural commodity in the U.S
    (0 to 150 in the last 10 years).
  • Michigan is the primary producer of tart cherries
    in the U.S. (gt70 of production), and most parts
    of the value chain are in the state.
  • The impact of climate on the tart cherry industry
    is not well understood and has not been
    investigated in an industry-wide context.
  • Collectively, these factors allow a unique
    opportunity to link expertise in tart cherry
    production, economics, and climate science.

6
Approach/Methodology
  • Sequential approach used (linkage of multiple
    models) at multiple locations across the Great
    Lakes Region
  • Models of tart cherry phenology, yield, and
    economic value chain were developed.
  • Two time frames considered historical
    (1960-2003) and projected future (1990-2100).
  • Ensemble of climate scenarios employed to
    estimate uncertainty.
  • Based on stakeholder input, research results used
    to develop www-based tools for industry.
  • Approach designed to be exportable to other
    systems.

7
Socioeconomic Scenarios
Value Chain Economic Model(s)
Tart Cherry Simulation Model
Risk Management Decision Making Tools, Policy
Framework
Climate Observations or Scenarios
Land use change scenarios
8
Stakeholder Involvement
9
(No Transcript)
10
Historical Climate Tool
  • The Historical Climate Tool provides users with
    access to over 40 years (1960-2002) of daily
    observations for seven climate variables at 15
    stations in the Great Lakes region and three
    nearby large urban areas (Chicago, Milwaukee, and
    Minneapolis). Data can be downloaded into an
    EXCEL file format for further analysis by the
    user. The climate variables are maximum
    temperature, minimum temperature, daily average
    temperature, liquid-equivalent precipitation,
    frozen precipitation, Heat Index and Wind Chill.
  • The summary option for the Historical Climate
    Tool allows the user to view climate summary
    statistics in a graphical format for the seven
    climate variables listed above. Users have the
    option to view the climatological normals and
    daily extreme values by month for 1971-2000 or to
    compare recent observations for selected
    stakeholder relevant periods to climatological
    normals.

11
Observed Climate Data
  • Primary source is State Climatology Office for
    Michigan.
  • Data come from cooperative stations and
    first-order stations
  • Unique in that the temperature, liquid
    precipitation, and snowfall data have been
    subjected to additional quality-control
    procedures and missing data have been estimated
    from neighboring stations.
  • Quality-controlled series for 1960-2000

12
(No Transcript)
13
1982-1-1 to 1-15
14
Future Climates
  • Users can create their own scenarios.
  • Use a suite of already created scenarios.
  • A scenario is an internally consistent and
    plausible future state (Carter et al. 1996). A
    scenario is NOT a forecast or a prediction. A
    scenario is a tool, and the traditional
    starting point for a climate impact assessment.

15
Several sources of uncertainty
  • Many sources of uncertainty need to be considered
  • Cascade of Uncertainty

Source IPCC, 2001
16
Ensemble Approach
  • Multiple scenarios for each location are used to
    estimate the quantifiable range of uncertainty.

Source IPCC, 2001
17
Variables
  • Basic variables (maximum temperature, minimum
    temperature, wet/dry days, and liquid-equivalent
    precipitation)
  • Daily temporal resolution for multiple locations
  • Climate model (GCM) based
  • Empirically-derived
  • Change in mean may not be very meaningful. More
    important are changes in climate variables
    relevant to an activity or industry
  • The basic climate variables (i.e., maximum
    temperature, minimum temperature, and liquid
    precipitation) can be used to derive thresholds,
    spells, snowfall, etc.

18
(No Transcript)
19
  • 15 Locations
  • 3 climate parameters
  • Tmax
  • Tmin
  • precipitation
  • 4 GCMs
  • CCC CGCM2
  • HadCM2
  • MPI ECHAM4
  • NCAR CSM1.2
  • 2 Emission scenarios
  • A2, B2
  • 5 Downscaling methodologies

gt60 scenarios for each climate variable per
location
20
gt60 scenarios for each climate variable per
location
2000 daily temperature and precipitation
scenarios for 1990-2100
21
Future Scenarios Tool
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Projected change in the number of wet days in a
30-year period
28
SUMMER
29
SPRING
30
Future Work
  • Important spatial-temporal dynamics are missing
    from the assessment process
  • International trade
  • Emerging and/or declining production areas and
    markets
  • Flexibility (mid-course adjustments, insurance)

31
A International Collaborative Effort
  • Ninety percent of world production of tart
    cherries is concentrated in only nine countries
    North America (primarily U.S.) and central Europe
    (primarily Germany and Poland).
  • The German and United States industries can be
    considered mature, with a structure
    representative of much of agriculture in the
    developed world (more concentrated production
    with increasing pressure from new competitors)
  • The Polish tart cherry industry is developing
    rapidly technological advances have motivated a
    steady increase in production and world trade
    volumes since 1996. Poland is now the world
    leader in tart cherry exports.
  • Ukrainian industry is currently struggling with
    conversion to a free-market system. Production
    continues to supply local needs and provide
    regional benefits, but policy and infrastructure
    have constrained new long-term agricultural
    investments including those in tart cherries

32
(No Transcript)
33
Questions?
34
Contact Information
  • Jeff Andresen andresen_at_msu.edu
  • Julie Winkler winkler_at_msu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com