Title: From Compromise to Secession
1Chapter 14
- From Compromise to Secession
- 1850-1861
2Introduction
- The decade of the 1850s opened with a compromise
that was supposed to settle sectional
differences but it quickly came undone - Instead the 1850s, lurched from one sectional
crisis to the next - The most devastating of those occurred on October
16, 1859 - WV John Brown article
- PBS.org
3Introduction (cont.)
- John Brown and 18 followers seized the federal
arsenal and armory at Harpers Ferry - They intended to arm southern white and black
dissidents in a holy war against slavery - Browns failed raid convinced southerners that
they had barely survived a northern plot to get
them all murdered in a slave insurrection - Northerners, while initially disavowing Brown,
came, during his trial, to sympathize with him - The whole incident set the stage for civil war
4Introduction (cont.)
- 1.) How did the Fugitive Slave Act lead to the
undoing of the Compromise of 1850? - 2.) Why did the Whig Party collapse after the
Kansas-Nebraska Act while the Democratic Party
survived? - 3.) How did the Republican doctrine of free soil
unify northerners against the South? - 4.) Why did southerners conclude that the North
was bent on extinguishing slavery in the southern
states?
5The Compromise of 1850
- Introduction
- When the treaty ending the Mexican War was signed
in 1848, a delicate balance existed between free
and slave states - 15 of each
- All the proposed solutions for handling slavery
in the Mexican cession were controversial - Whether to prohibit it
- Open the whole area to slaveholders
- Extend the Missouri Compromise line to the
Pacific - Or apply popular sovereignty
- Other issues also divided the North and South
- CA and UT asked Congress for admission to the
Union as free states
6Zachary Taylor at the Helm
- President Taylor had encouraged CA to make the
request for statehood as a free state. - Believing that the majority of its residents
opposed slavery, he urged Congress to welcome it
into the Union as a free state. - Southerners were horrified at the prospect of
losing the balance of power in the Senate by
admitting CA and perhaps next NM as free states - In protest, 9 southern states sent delegates to a
southern convention at Nashville
7Henry Clay Proposes a Compromise
- Senator Clay proposed a compromise to settle the
territorial problem and other sectional
controversies - 1.) Admit CA as a free state
- 2.) Divide the rest of the Mexican cession into
NM and UT territories, with the future of slavery
in each left up to its residents - 3.) Settle the border dispute between TX and NM
in NMs favor - 4.) Compensate TX by having the federal govt. pay
off the states past public debt
8Henry Clay Proposes a Compromise (cont.)
- 5.) Allow slavery to continue in Washington D.C.
but ban slave trading there - 6.) Pass and enforce a tough new fugitive slave
law - After heated debate and much maneuvering, the
compromise passed
9Assessing the Compromise
- The Compromise of 1850 did not settle the
underlying differences between the sections - The one clear advantage that the South gained,
the passage of the stringent Fugitive Slave Act,
backfired
10Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act
- The law was blatantly stacked against black
people and sent federal marshals all over the
country looking for runaways - This aroused widespread opposition in the North
- Northern mobs attacked marshals to rescue
arrested fugitives - Vigilance committees helped runaways escape to
Canada - 9 states passed personal liberty laws designed to
interfere with enforcement of the Act - Whereas the Act embittered northerners against
the South, southerners resented the Norths
refusal to live up to the terms of the Compromise
11Uncle Toms Cabin
- Harriet Beecher Stowe
- By 1853, 1.2 million copies had been sold
- Aroused many antisouthern feelings and sympathy
for slaves
12The election of 1852
- The WhigsGeneral Winfield Scott
- War hero
- DemocratsFranklin Pierce
- The Democrats rallied behind the Compromise of
1850 and popular sovereignty in the territories - Whigs were torn apart into northern Whigs and
southern Whigs over the sectional controversy
13The election of 1852 (cont.)
14The Collapse of the Second Party System, 1853-1856
- Introduction
- During Pierces administration the 2nd party
system (Whigs vs. Democrats) collapsed - In the 1850s, the issues (banking, internal
improvements, tariffs, and temperance) that had
been the main focus of partisan politics were
pushed from center stage - New debate was over slaverys extension
- The Whig Party was internally divided over the
issue - Disintegrated when Stephan A. Douglass
Kansas-Nebraska bill threw the future of slavery
in the territories wide open
15The Kansas-Nebraska Act
- Passage of this act in 1854 dealt a shattering
blow to the second party system - It also renewed the sectional strife that Clays
compromise had aimed to quiet - Stephen A. Douglas was eager to advance the
settlement of Kansas and Nebraska and to promote
the building of a transcontinental railroad
through the area
16The Kansas-Nebraska Act (cont.)
- To accomplish these goals, he needed to organize
a territorial govt. for the region - But he was running into southern opposition
because the area was north of the Missouri
Compromise line and would therefore be free - To gain southern support, Douglas introduced the
Kansas-Nebraska Bill
17The Kansas-Nebraska Act (cont.)
- It repealed the Missouri Compromise
- Organized the 2 territories
- Left the question of slavery in both KS and NE up
to popular sovereignty - That gave the South a chance to gain at least KS
for the peculiar institution
18The Kansas-Nebraska Act (cont.)
- History Place.com
- U.S. News--actual document
19The Surge of Free-Soil
- Douglas was surprised at the angry reaction in
the North - Many regarded the law as part of an atrocious
southern plot to spread slavery into KS, the rest
of the LA Territory, and even into the North - Free-soil sentiment had grown tremendously in the
North - Not primarily because of sympathy for black
slaves - Many free-soilers were racists
- But because northerners wanted the territories to
be the place where upwardly mobile, enterprising,
poor Americans could become independent,
self-employed farmers and businessmen
20The Surge of Free-Soil (cont.)
- If slavery invaded the territories, it would
discourage and drive out free labor
21The Ebbing of Manifest Destiny
- Enthusiasm for expansion waned in the free states
- northerners saw in each southern move to acquire
territory a plot to gain additional slave states - This northern attitude became so pronounced that
Pres. Pierce had to repudiated southern-backed
plans to buy or seize Cuba
22The Whigs Disintegrate1854-1855
- Southern Whigs had joined Democrats in voting for
the KS-NE Act - Northern conscience Whigs, led by Senator
William Seward, and free-soil Democrats reacted
angrily against both of the major parties - In the elections of 1854 and 1855, many of the
disaffected Whigs turned first to the
Know-Nothing (American) Party - Later they voted increasingly to the new
Republican Party - As a result of these moves, the Whig Party fell
apart
23The Rise and Fall of the Know-Nothings, 1853-1856
- Know-Nothings was also called the American Party
- It evolved out of a secret nativist society
called the Order of the Star-Spangled Banner - In the North, the party combined hatred of
Catholics, immigrants, and slavery-extension - It took a conspiratorial view of the world in
which the Pope and Slave Power were both plotting
to extinguish the American democratic republic - In 1854 and 1855, the Know-Nothings scored major
victories in northern states such as MA
24The Rise and Fall of the Know-Nothings, 1853-1856
(cont.)
- However, the Party declined rapidly after 1855
- It was pulled apart by the slavery-expansion
issue - Its southern adherents supported the KS-NE Act
- a position unacceptable to northern nativists,
who deserted to the emerging Republicans
25The Republican Party and the Crisis in Kansas,
1855-1856
- The Republican Party first appeared in several
northern states in protest against the KS-NE Act - As the Know-Nothings waned by 1856, the
Republicans became the main opposition party to
the Democrats - The Republicans were basically a coalition of
former northern Whigs and Democrats who wanted to
restore the MO Compromise, Liberty Party
abolitionists, and free-soilers
26The Republican Party and the Crisis in KS,
1855-1856 (cont.)
- Little united them at first except their
opposition to the KS-NE Act - However, the subsequent fighting in KS between
proslavery and antislavery forces greatly
strengthened the party and its free-soil stand
27The Republican Party and the Crisis in KS,
1855-1856 (cont.)
- Both proslavery and antislavery settlers rushed
to KS - In 1855, when the first election for a
territorial legislature took place, thousands of
proslavery Missourians invaded KS for the day and
voted illegally - This fraud produced a rabidly proslavery
legislature - Which from its capital in Lecompton, KS, passed
repressive laws aimed at squelching the
free-soilers
28The Republican Party and the Crisis in KS,
1855-1856 (cont.)
- The free-soilers, considering the Lecompton
legislature a shame - They organized a rival govt. in Topeka
- After the sack of Lawrence and John Browns
Pottawatomie massacre - A civil war broke out in KS
- Between the 2 govts. and their followers
- Popular sovereignty had not worked
29The Republican Party and the Crisis in KS,
1855-1856 (cont.)
- Popular sovereignty caused angry debate between
Pierce and Northern Democrats and Republicans - Pierce and Northern Democratsrecognized the
fraudulent Lecompton govt. - Republicansdecried the outcome as a shame
- It also spread violence to Congress with Preston
Brooks attack on Senator Charles Sumner
30The Election of 1856
- Republicans nominated John C. Fremont
- Platform called on Congress to exclude slavery
from all remaining territories - Democrats nominated James Buchanan
- Backed popular sovereignty
- Know-Nothings nominated Millard Fillmore
- Buchanan won but the Republicans did remarkably
well in the North - Had Fremont carried PA and either IL or IN, he
would have been elected - Despite receiving almost no southern votes
31The Election of 1856 (cont.)
32The Crisis of the Union1857-1860
- The Dred Scott Case, 1857
- Decision was made 2 days after Buchanans
inauguration - the Supreme Court entered the controversy over
slavery in the territories - The Supreme Court was composed mostly of
southerners - Ruled that blacks (slave or free) were not
citizens of the United States - Also ruled that the Missouri Compromise had
always been unconstitutional because Congress had
no right to exclude slavery from any territory - To do so violated the 5th Amendment protection of
property and property holders
33The Crisis of the Union1857-1860 (cont.)
- The Republicans denounced the decision and
prepared to ignore it - PBS link
- National Archives--audio link
34The Lecompton Constitution1857
- In KS, the proslavery legislature proposed a
state constitution that protected slaveholders
and gave the settlers the right to vote only on
whether to allow more slaves into KS - President Buchanan backed the Lecompton
constitution and called on Congress to grant KS
statehood under it
35The Lecompton Constitution1857 (cont.)
- Stephen Douglas (author of the KS-NE Act) broke
with Buchanan and denounced the actions of the
Lecompton legislature - Claimed it undermined the original intent of
popular sovereignty - Northern Democrats and Republicans applauded
Douglas - Southern Democrats applauded Buchanan
36The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
- In 1858, Douglas ran for reelection to the Senate
- Abraham Lincoln was the Republican nominee
- Not well-know or political successful at the time
- Lincoln challenged Douglas to a series of debates
37The Lincoln-Douglas Debates (cont.)
- In the debates, Lincoln attacked slavery as
morally evil but denied that Congress had the
right to abolish it in the South or that he
favored equality for blacks - Rather, he stuck to his position that barring
slavery from the territories - Lincoln also forced Douglas into making his
Freeport Doctrine statement - Which pleased northern Democrats but made Douglas
and his views unacceptable to the South
38The Lincoln-Douglas Debates (cont.)
- Although Douglas won the IL Senate seat, the
election further split the Democratic Party - It also made Lincoln famous in the North and
infamous in the South - Debate summaries
39The Legacy of Harpers Ferry
- John Browns raid touched off a wave of fear and
hysteria in the South - Southerners believed Brown had the backing of
abolitionists and Republicans who were plotting
to incite more slave rebellions - These fears played into the hands of southern
extremists
40The South Contemplates Secession
- Southerners began to speak of secession as the
only way to protect themselves - They regarded northern opposition to the Fugitive
Slave Act and to slavery in KS as
unconstitutional - They also saw it as an offense to the South
- Which wounded southern pride
- Some argued that separation from the Union would
also permit the South to seize more territory in
the Caribbean and the West for slavery
41The Collapse of the Union1860-1861
- The Election of 1860
- The Republicans broadened their appeal in the
free states in 1860 by supporting a protective
tariff, federal aid for internal improvements,
and a homestead act - Lincoln was there nominee for President
- The northern and southern Democrats were unable
to agree on a platform so they split
42The Election of 1860 (cont.)
- Northern DemocratsDouglas
- Still advocated popular sovereignty
- Southern DemocratsJohn C. Breckenridge
- Insisted that Congress must pass laws protecting
slavery in all territories - Constitutional Union PartyJohn Bell
- Appealed mostly in the border states and Upper
South - Lincoln won
- His name did not appear on southern ballots
- Won a majority of electoral college
- Only 39 of popular vote
43The Election of 1860
44The Movement for Secession
- Believing that a Republican president would
unleash more John Browns on them - The states of the Deep South began to secede even
before Lincoln took office - SC led the way on Dec. 1860
- AL, MS, FL, GA, LA, TX
- On Feb. 4, 1861, delegates from those 7 states
met in Montgomery, AL to form the Confederate
States of America
45The Search for Compromise
- KY senator John Crittenden proposed a compromise
to bring the Deep South back into the Union - It included constitutional amendments that
guaranteed the federal govt. would never
interfere with slavery in the South - That drew the MO Compromise line across the
remaining territories - with slavery permitted south of the line in all
present and future U.S. territory
46The Search for Compromise (cont.)
- Lincoln rejected the Crittenden plan because he
would not abandon the free-soil promise on which
he had been elected - He regarded the plan as an invitation to the
South to seize territory in the Caribbean for
slavery - He also felt that he had won an honest election
- That giving in to a losing minority would damage
the American tradition of majority rule
47The Coming of War
- The Confederacy began to take over federal forts
within it region - Soon after Lincolns inauguration, the
Confederacy bombarded Fort Sumter in Charlestons
harbor - thus firing the 1st shot in the rebellion that
became the Civil War - Lincoln responded by proclaiming that a rebellion
existed in the Lower South - Called for 75,000 militia volunteers from the
loyal states to subdue it
48The Coming of War (cont.)
- Rather than send their troops to fight against
sister southern states, VA, NC, AR, and TN
seceded and joined the Confederacy - The North was now aroused and ready to fight to
save the Union - though not yet ready to abolish slavery
49(No Transcript)
50Conclusion
- At no time prior to the Civil War, did the
majority of Americans call for the end of slavery
in the South - Rather, in the 1850s, the gulf between the North
and South widened over the spread of slavery into
the territories - Northerners believed their freedom to pursue
economic opportunity would be denied if they had
to compete against slave labor in the West
51Conclusion (cont.)
- Southerners claimed that to curtail slavery in
the territories violated their constitutional
right to use their property (slaves) as they saw
fit - Attempts to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law, the
KS-NE Acts repeal of the MO Compromise, the
subsequent fighting in KS, the Dred Scott
decision, and John Browns raid all further
embittered intersectional conflict
52Conclusion (cont.)
- National political parties collapsed under the
strain - the Whigs disintegrated
- The Democrats divided into northern and southern
wings - A new strictly northern party, the Republicans,
emerged
53Conclusion (cont.)
- By the end of the 1850s, northerners were
convinced the South meant to impose slavery
throughout the nation - Southern states were ready for secession as the
only way to protect their peculiar institution
from a North that they saw as intent on
destroying slavery even in the South