BioTech Oklahoma

1
BioTech Oklahoma

• BiotechnologyDevelopment Plan

2
BioTech Oklahoma
The ProblemOklahoma AssetsA State
ModelStrategies

• BiotechnologyDevelopment Plan

3
Why Bio Technology?

• Economic development
• Academic enrichment
• Leverage existing resources

4
The Goals
1 Billion

• Double biomedical research by 2007 300M
• Create a destination hospital system 300M
• Create a science education infrastructure 400M

5
The Benefits

• Non-metro Oklahoma number
• State/municipal revenues number
• Employment creation number
• Revenue retention number
• Academic enrichment priceless

6
The Problem

• Competitiveness for National Institutes of Health
  Grants

7
Terms

• IDeA States (NIH)Institutional Development
  Awards
• EPSCoR States (NSF)Experimental Program to
  Stimulate Competitive Research

8
NIH Funding Per Capita
52
18
58
12
11
29
17
32
47
9
National Ranking
14
35
12
39
43
26
36
25
10
IDeA States ... Pennsylvania
Alaska Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Population NIH Funds IDeA States 43 million
740 million Pennsylvania 12 million 854 million
11
NIH Grants - Keeping Up?
National (area)
States (lines)
Alabama
Oregon
Oklahoma
12
Our Assets

• Oklahoma Health Center/Universities/Foundations

13
Oklahoma Health Center

• 13,000 employees
• 75 million biomedical research
• Startup development sponsor

14
Oklahoma Health Center

• Less out-of-state revenue
• Generate only 2,500 of NIH income per employee
• Lagging on per capita NIH revenue

15
Research Universities

• University of Tulsa
• University of Oklahoma
• Oklahoma State University

16
Foundations

• Sam R. Noble Foundation
• W. K. Warren Foundation
• Presbyterian Health Foundation
• Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

17
1999 Biomedical Summit

• Improved IDeA funding
• OHRP competition insured
• Increased media coverage
• Secured interest of elected officials
• Energized biomedical debate and discussion
• Stimulated cooperative university proposals

18
2000 Biomedical Summit
19
A Model

• State of Alabama
• University of Alabama at Birmingham

20
Alabama
National (area)
States (lines)
Alabama
Oklahoma
21
1998 NIH Grants
22
1998 NIH Funding
166M
35M
Alabama
Oklahoma
23
Birmingham

• No state interference
• Leadership continuity
• Royalties re-invested
• Research space provided
• Practice income for recruitment

24
Birmingham

• Centers of Excellence
• Integration
• Focus
• Goals A Top Ten State

25
1998 NIH Grants
523
Total Grants
256
R01 Grants
110
62
Birmingham
Oklahoma City
26
1998 NIH Grants
491
249
Total Grants
R01 Grants
71
40
34
22
UAB
OMRF
OUHSC
27
Strategies

• Statewide Cooperation and Collaboration

28
Seven Strategies

• Public Support
• Statewide Focus
• Leadership
• Infrastructure

• Civic
• Growth
• Financial

29
Public Support
Strategy

• KEY resource
• All strategies dependent upon public support
• Need a champion w/clout and public profile
• Sell research benefits to legislature
• Marshal fund-raising efforts

30
Statewide Focus
Strategy

• North East Tulsa
• North Central Stillwater
• South Southwest Ardmore
• Central OKC Metro

31
Statewide Focus
Strategy
32
Leadership
Strategy

• Overarching vision for the state
• Integrate efforts at individual institutions
• Necessary .. But not sufficient

33
Infrastructure
Strategy

• Expand Center Concept
• Cancer Center
• Heart Disease Center
• Others

34
Civic
Strategy

• New strategic plans
• Congressional delegation
• Formalize a Biotech Council
• Promote Oklahoma Health Center
• Enhance C-OK business commitment to OHC

35
Growth
Strategy

• Immunology 30M
• Cancer 40M
• Cardiovascular 10M
• Genetics 20M

36
Civic
Strategy

• New strategic plans
• Congressional delegation
• Formalize a Biotech Council
• Promote Oklahoma Health Center
• Enhance C-OK business commitment to OHC

37
Financial
Strategy

• Statewide Bond Issue
• OMRF Capital Campaign
• State Regents for Higher Ed
  
• State Legislature
• OCAST
• Other

38
A Possibility ...

• Increase researchers by 100
• Increase research dollars by 200