Geekwork and Bean Counters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Geekwork and Bean Counters

Description:

Clear boundaries between work and personal life. ... people did user-training (so high ownership from ... San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass. Hertzberg, F. (1987) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: jerryw5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geekwork and Bean Counters


1
Geekwork and Bean Counters
  • Fostering effective communication between
    business and technical staff

David Schmidt, FHSU Jerry Smith, PSU CHECK
Conference May 23, 2007
2
Thinking Differently
  • Many major college and university IT projects
    require detailed interaction between information
    technology workers (Geeks) and university
    business and operations staff (Bean Counters).
  • The degree to which these teams effectively work
    together is a major (maybe the most important)
    factor in determining the projects success or
    failure.
  • Studies have shown that Geeks and Bean Counters
    seem to think and act differently and
    understanding these difference can greatly
    facilitate effective communications within the
    team.

3
Why Are We Talking Stereotypes?
  • Stereotypes exist for a reason - they help us
    consider some general patterns of behavior.
  • In reality the behaviors are unique to each
    individual.
  • Yet, people are attracted to professions that
    complement their personalities.
  • An effective leader needs to understand how to
    work with a variety of personality styles.

4
Geeks Are Different
  • Interpersonal relations can be challenging among
    people who work with technology
  • People who choose technical careers do so, in
    part, because they would rather work with
    technology than people
  • The fact that the term Geek has come to be
    applied to technical workers indicates that there
    exists a difference in style among those who
    develop and work with technology.

5
What is a Geek?
  • Geeks are the knowledge workers who specialize in
    the creation, maintenance, or support of high
    technology
  • Geeks are the highly intelligent, usually
    introverted, extremely valuable,
    independent-minded, hard to find,
    difficult-to-keep technology workers who are
    essential to the future of the university

6
Geek Characteristics
  • Even though all individuals are unique one can
    identify some attributes that often apply to
    information workers
  • A Passion for Reason
  • A Problem-Solution Mind-Set
  • Experienced Early Success
  • A Joy for Puzzles
  • Curiosity

7
Geek Characteristics (cont)
  • Geeks Choose Machines
  • Self-Expression Equals Communication
  • My Facts Are Your Facts
  • Judgment Is Swift and Merciless
  • My Work Is My Art
  • A Reverence For Smart People
  • Loyalty to Technology and Profession
  • A Strong Sense of Fairness
  • A Strong Rebellious Streak

8
An Illustrative Project
  • At FHSU there was a pressing need to display some
    data on the web.
  • One staff member rose to the challenge.
  • The staff member consulted with one major
    administrator and posted the information.

9
Illustrative Example (cont)
  • A technical success users used the system
    extensively the response-time is good people
    count on it.
  • A project failure the Administrator liked it,
    but other managers found the information
    confusing, and their staff had more work.

10
Illustrative Example
  • The Problem too much of a Lone Ranger approach
    a mismatch between user expectations and what
    was delivered.
  • No review of screens ahead of time.
  • No real input from users.

11
Geekwork Is Different
  • The character of geekwork doesnt conform to
    many common assumptions or images of the
    workplace, turning some long-held beliefs on
    their heads - some examples are
  • Failure is normal
  • Ambiguity rules
  • Figuring out what to do can be harder than doing
    it
  • Geekwork is organized by what you do not know
  • Geekwork requires deep concentration
  • The boundaries of work are hard to define

12
Geekwork Is Different (cont)
  • Subordinates know more than managers
  • Geekwork requires both individual and teamwork
  • It is hard to get done with a job
  • Creativity can not be controlled
  • Estimates are always wrong

13
Bean Counters Are Different Also
  • Business Workers also have personality traits
    that may conflict with Geeks
  • People are attracted to business related jobs
    because they like order and predictability.
  • Clear boundaries between work and personal life.
  • Bottom line, solution focused - not into the
    process or the elegance of solutions.
  • For the most part Bean Counters do not like
    ambiguity - but many learn to live with it.
  • Getting tasks (job) done is a major motivator.
  • Bean Counters tend to be loyal to the
    organization more than the industry (profession)

14
Differences Lead To Conflict
  • These differences may lead to a Geek Focused
    environment in companies that build and market
    technology, but in the university environment
    technical workers must be able to work with a
    wide variety of people from Humanities Professors
    to Football coaches.
  • If the wide range of personalities at the
    university make it difficult for those who are
    highly skilled in interpersonal relations to get
    along with everyone, how exceedingly difficult it
    can be for a technical staff member.

15
Sources of Conflict What Makes Bean Counters
Mad At Geeks
  • Geeks are hard to understand Cant get a
    straight answer
  • Geeks expect to be treated differently
  • Geeks are hard to work with on a team They just
    want to do their own thing
  • Geeks Cant Get Stuff Done On Time (or Budget)
  • Geeks arent loyal to the university

16
Sources of Conflict What Makes Geeks Mad At
Bean Counters
  • People have unreasonable expectations
  • People do not take the time to understand the
    technology and what it takes to deliver requests
  • People do not appreciate the beauty of the
    technology solution
  • People dont treat me fairly
  • People do not provide adequate resources for the
    task
  • People are stupid

17
A Successful Project
  • Small programming team (4 web programmers 1
    mainframe programmer)
  • Complex programming environment (.NET, Java
    uPortal, Cobol legacy code, stored procedures,
    UDB) could not break the existing mainframe
    program.
  • Complex undertaking reengineering enrollment
    for the web

18
Success Factors
  • Very significant, continuous administrative
    involvement every week at least 2 hours
    Registrar, Director of Virtual College, Dean of
    the Graduate School, Managers of Advising,
    Student Fiscal Services, Financial Aid, and the
    Technical Team (Director of IT and Team)
  • High visibility, tight deadlines, real give and
    take, clear responsibility for tasks

19
Success Factors
  • High focus on productivity
  • The non-technical people did user-training (so
    high ownership from the sponsors)
  • Met a controlled pilot deadline -- made
    adjustments opened it up for all
  • A very usable product accepted by students
  • Communication valued the common good
    willingness to compromise (all)

20
The Need for Conflict Resolution
  • In most cases university technical staff leave
    (or are asked to leave) their positions, not
    because of technical competency, but because of
    difficulties getting along with fellow workers,
    clients or others in the university community.
  • To be successful in the university environment
    the technical worker must learn how to deal with
    conflict in effective ways.
  • University business staff often settle for
    information services that do not fully meet their
    needs because of conflict with technical workers
  • Both Geeks and Bean Counters can be significantly
    damaged (in both work output and interpersonal
    relations) if conflict is not resolved

21
Building the Conflict Resolution Environment
  • Leadership is important in establishing an
    environment where conflict can be managed and
    resolved.
  • Traditional leadership approaches based on power
    and authority do not work well with technical
    workers - Production is grounded in thought, not
    behavior.
  • Effective leaders must provide for facilitation
    -maintaining the local work environment and
    information flow

22
Facilitation of Conflict Resolution
  • The effective leader must develop an environment
    conducive to productive work
  • A culture of community must be developed and
    fostered
  • Establish and reinforce core values
  • Most importantly the culture must provide for
    safety for ideas
  • It must also be safe to make stupid comments
    without being dismissed by the group as an idiot

23
Building an Environment for Healthy Conflict
  • Valuing achievement
  • Defining physical space
  • Be a Therapist
  • Facilitating tasks - cutting red tape
  • Allocating resources
  • Coordinating schedules and tasks
  • Overcoming obstacles (must know when to help)

24
Building an Environment for Healthy Conflict
(cont)
  • Monitoring effectiveness (making sure things are
    moving along)
  • Arranging interventions
  • Must not intervene too soon
  • But, dont avoid interventions when needed
  • Streaming information
  • Information sharing helps set the tone
  • Information sharing must be with the whole group
    / staff

25
Managing Conflict through Representation
  • The effective leader of technical workers can
    foster productivity in relationships by providing
    representation of the technical staff to external
    groups.
  • This representation includes
  • Managing expectations
  • Projecting prominence and group prestige

26
Managing Conflict through Representation (cont)
  • Providing protection to the group by
  • Being an advocate for the technical staff
  • Acting as a political insulator
  • Being a buffer to change

27
Summing it up
  • The natural differences between Geeks and Bean
    Counters will naturally result in conflict
  • Technical workers can become stronger team
    players by developing some basic conflict
    resolution skills
  • The leader of the technical staff can provide
    instruction, encouragement and facilitation to
    make conflict manageable and even productive

28
References
  • Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity.
    Harvard Business Review. Sept Oct 1998, pp.
    76-87.
  • Dana, D. (2001). Conflict Resolution. New York
    McGraw-Hill.
  • Glen, P. (2003). Leading Geeks how to manage and
    lead people who deliver technology. San
    Francisco, CAJossey-Bass.
  • Hertzberg, F. (1987). One more time How do you
    motivate employees? Harvard Business Review.
    Sept-Oct 1987, pp. 6-13.
  • Humphrey, W.S. (1987). Managing for innovation
    leading technical people. Upper Saddle River, NJ
    Prentice Hall.
  • Ivancevich, J.M. Duening, T.N. (2002) Managing
    Einsteins leading high tech workers in the
    digital age. New York McGraw-Hill.
  • Raelin, J.A. (1991). The clash of cultures
    managers managing professionals. Boston Harvard
    Business School Press.
  • Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture moving
    from debate to dialogue. New YorkRandom House.
  • Weinberg, G. M. (1986). Becoming a technical
    leader an organic problem-solving approach. New
    York Dorset House.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com