DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS

Description:

... of RFP should include a 'Calendar of Events': Date of RFP ... What's Wrong With This Picture? 37. 53. 41. Total Technical (60 ... This Picture? ( cont'd) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: nys7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS


1
DIVISION OF STATE SERVICESBUREAU OF CONTRACTS
4/05/06
2
Developing Request for Proposals (RFP)
Evaluation Instrument
May 2006
3
Agenda
  • Defining Best Value
  • Planning Your RFP
  • RFP Components
  • RFP Evaluation and Selection Process
  • Developing Clear Evaluation Instrument
    Instructions
  • The Evaluation Criteria
  • Sample Evaluation Criteria
  • Completing the Procurement Package

4
Agenda
  • Participants will learn
  • The concept of best value
  • Steps in planning a Request for Proposal (RFP)
  • What should be included in an RFP
  • Developing clear instructions for proposal
    reviewers
  • Developing evaluation instrument to accompany RFP
  • Components of a complete procurement package

5
Best Value
  • Defined 163
  • A best value award is one which optimizes
    quality, cost, and efficiency and typically
    applies to complex services and technology
    contracts.

6
Best Value
  • So What Does Best Value Mean?

7
Planning Your RFP
  • Develop a procurement strategy.
  • Start with the end in mind
  • Develop a timeline for the procurement, including
    deliverable need dates
  • Decide which elements of the procurement process
    will be utilized
  • Evaluation process (evaluators)
  • Other special circumstances that will need to be
    addressed
  • Identify latest procurement rules and regulations
    and ensure they are incorporated into RFP

8
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Description of administrative process
  • A timeline
  • First page of RFP should include a Calendar of
    Events
  • Date of RFP Issuance
  • Date Questions and Answers are due
  • Date Questions and Answers will be sent to
    bidders
  • Deadline for Receipt of Proposals

9
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Description of agency mission
  • Requirements describing the services needed
  • Minimum qualifications
  • Specifications of services to be provided
  • Additional information required to be included in
    proposal
  • References
  • Contract terms and conditions

10
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Procurement Policies, Statutes Disclosures
  • Appendix A
  • Executive Order 127 (G-Bulletin 219)
  • Vendor Responsibility (G-Bulletin 221)
  • Sales and Compensating Use Tax Documentation
  • (G-Bulletin 222)
  • Procurement Lobbying Law

11
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • We strongly recommend publishing your mandatory
    contract provisions (agency or procurement
    specific) in the RFP.
  • Rationale
  • Allows potential bidders to raise concerns prior
    to submitting a bid
  • Eliminates vendors who are not willing to meet
    these mandatory provisions, thus
  • Avoiding prolonged and fruitless contract
    negotiations
  • Saving agency time and money
  • Preventing gaps in program / service delivery

12
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Evaluation criteria must state
  • Minimum Qualifications (Pass / Fail)
  • Fee schedules for cost if multiple years, should
    define how fees should be provided (e.g., limit
    annual increase to Consumer Price Index (CPI) as
    published by the U.S. Dept. of Labor. Identify
    the specific index to be used).
  • Identification of technical criteria to be
    evaluated
  • Relative weight between technical and cost
  • Recommend developing the evaluation instrument at
    the same time as the RFP

13
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • It is strongly recommended to inform your bidding
    audience (in the RFP) if the weight (points
    assigned) of one particular technical criterion
    far outweighs the others (for example, 40 of 70
    points are assigned to experience)
  • Why?
  • This helps to keep all bidders on an even
    playing field and results in balanced
    proposals
  • You want to award the contract to the best
    vendor, not simply to the vendor who guessed
    the best at what was important to you
  • Refer to Handout No. 1 Example of Good
    Evaluation Language for Your RFP

14
Method of Award
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • An example of clear language
  • Upon completion of the evaluation process, a
    contract will be awarded to the proposer whose
    proposal met all mandatory requirements and
    obtained the highest composite score, considering
    both cost and technical.

15
Method of Award
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Multiple Awards
  • RFP should reserve the right to make multiple
    awards. Where practical, the RFP should indicate
    the number of awards the agency expects to make.
    The RFP should also state how work will be
    assigned.
  • The number of awards to be made and the
    allocation of work must be determined prior to
    receipt of proposals and documented in the
    evaluation instrument.

16
What Should Be Included In RFP
  • Include RFP language which
  • Allows agency to reject any and all bids
  • Allows agency the right to request clarification
    and revisions
  • Allows agency the right not to proceed with an
    award
  • Establishes a minimum period of proposal validity
    that the bidder agrees to (example price firm
    for 180 days and/or proposal irrevocable for 30
    days)

17
  • Other Tasks to Complete
  • Procurement must appear in Contract Reporter at
    least 15 business days prior to the due date of
    proposals
  • Develop solicitation list

18
Evaluation andSelection Process
19
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • All evaluation criteria must be established prior
    to the receipt of bids
  • Very important to be clear
  • Very important that relative weights match RFP
    weights

20
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • Establish the methodology to follow for
    evaluating all proposals
  • Identify the number of personnel and roles
    involved in the process
  • Formalize the procedures to be followed
  • Provide the sequence of events (timeline)

21
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • For math calculations, the evaluation instrument
    should define
  • How many decimal points the numbers will be
    extended
  • Whether the numbers will be rounded up or down

22
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • The evaluation instrument must reflect any
    modifications to specifications as a result of an
    amendment to the RFP.
  • For example, QAs may necessitate a change to
    specifications.
  • Changes must be issued via an amendment to the
    RFP and reflected in the evaluation instrument

23
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • The mandatory requirements checklist will be
    completed to ensure each vendors responsiveness
    to the RFP requirements. The agency will attempt
    to cure minor omissions or irregularities with
    the vendors. However, material deviations will
    result in the bidder being removed from
    consideration.
  • Refer to Handout No. 2 Proposal Checklist
    Mandatory Requirements or Pass/Fail Portion

24
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • Technical Evaluation Team
  • Mandatory requirements to be evaluated on
    Pass/Fail basis
  • The breakdown of points assigned to each of your
    technical criteria must be in your evaluation
    instrument
  • The same panel of evaluators will score the same
    criteria for each proposal

25
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • Technical Evaluation Team
  • If the technical evaluation requires the bidder
    to meet a minimum score in order to continue
    through the process, this information needs to be
    included in the evaluation instrument.

26
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • Technical Evaluation Team
  • Multiple Awards The agency needs to define the
    basis for how this decision will be made in
    ADVANCE OF RECEIPT of the bids.
  • Example Award will be made to the three firms
    with the highest composite score.
  • Example Award will be made to the highest
    scoring firm for each region.
  • Prior to making this decision, the agency will
    need to defend the need for multiple awards.
  • This information should be dated and secured
    throughout the evaluation process.

27
The Evaluation Instrument
  • Individual Technical Evaluation Form
  • The following should be included
  • Key indicating how to apply the points within the
    individual criteria
  • Designation of firm being evaluated
  • Evaluator designation

28
The Evaluation Instrument
  • Individual Technical Evaluation Form (2)
  • The following should be included
  • Technical criteria and weight of the specific
    criteria
  • Space for evaluators to place comments / notes
  • Initials of individual evaluator and date
    completed

29
Develop Clear Evaluation Instrument Instructions
  • Financial Proposal Evaluation Team
  • The basis for the financial proposal evaluation
    rankings will be the total price offer received
    from each offeror. The total price offers will
    be ranked with the low bid awarded the maximum
    points available. The remaining bids will be
    assigned scores based on the following formula
  • Low bid divided by bid being evaluated times the
    maximum number of points available

30
Refer to Handouts
  • Number 3 Price Offer Proposal Form
  • A and
  • Number 4 Examples of Evaluation
  • Criteria and Some Recommended
  • Relative Weights to Use

31
Whats Wrong With This Picture?
Evaluation Summary Matrix
32
Whats Wrong With This Picture? (contd)
  • Range of points assigned were not allowed by the
    scoring matrix. Re-bid may not be necessary if
    agency can rescore proposals in accordance with
    the evaluation instrument.

33
Who Should Get the Award????Technical 70 /
Cost 30
State Finance Law S163, Paragraph 10a
34
Who Should Get the Award????
  • If both cost and technical scores are identical,
    who should get the award?
  • When price and other factors are found to be
    substantially equivalent, the determination of
    the commissioner or agency head to award a
    contract to one or more of such bidders shall be
    final. The basis for determining the award shall
    be documented in the procurement record.

State Finance Law S163, Paragraph 10a
35
Whats Wrong With This Evaluation??Technical
60 pts / Cost 40 pts
36
Whats Wrong With This Evaluation??Technical
60 pts / Cost 40 pts
Bids which fail to meet mandatory requirements
must be excluded from the evaluation process
37
Very Important Reminders
  • Document evaluation notes and basis for assigning
    scores assists in debriefing bidders
  • A determination of vendor responsibility must
    also be performed

38
Very Important Reminders
  • After award decision is made, dont forget to
    issue intent to award / non-award letters.

39
Elements of a Fully Documented Procurement
Package
  • Copy of RFP and any amendments to RFP
  • Solicitation list
  • Certified Bid Tab
  • Contract Reporter advertisement / evidence of
    exemption
  • Evaluation instrument and matrix of scores and/or
    individual scoring sheets

40
Elements of a Fully Documented Procurement
Package (2)
  • Copy of notice of intent to award / non-award
    letters
  • Copy of winning proposal (cost and technical)
  • Copies of all rejected proposals (cost and
    technical)
  • Copies of all cost proposals for responsive
    bidders

41
Elements of a Fully Documented Procurement
Package (3)
  • Civil Service approval for contracts with
    individuals
  • Completed Procurement Record Checklist
  • Memo of transaction
  • Debriefing Notes

42
THANK YOU!
Any questions and please dont forget to fill out
the evaluation forms!!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com