Political System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Political System

Description:

Political risk is different from Sovereign Risk , which is the risk of ... Political. Economic. orientation. Economy size $10.2 Trillion 4.2 triilion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: busi210
Category:
Tags: political | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Political System


1
  • Political System
  • Democracy
    Authoritarianism
  • ( )
    (


  • )
  • 1. political power belongs obedience to
    the authority
  • to the citizens
    monopolized by a man/group
  • 2. Majority rules
    Minority rules
  • 3. Equality
    Inequality
  • 4. Relatively open
    Closed society
  • 5. Freedom
    Limited freedom
  • 6. Fair trial guaranteed
    judicial injustice

2
Economic System
  • A) Resource Allocation
  • 1. Market
  • 2. Planned (Command)
  • B) Ownership style
  • 1. Private
  • 2. Public

3
  • Political - Economic Synthesis
  • A) Political System B) Economic
    System
  • a)
    Resource b) Ownership
  • 1. Democracy Market
    Private ( )
  • 2. Totalitarian Planned
    Public ( )

  • Socialism
    Capitalism
  • Problem
  • Reason
  • Correction
  • Variation

4
  • Political Risk
  • Definition
  • Political risk is different from Sovereign
    Risk ,
  • which is the risk of (
    ).
  • Major elements of Political risk

5
  • Political Risk
  • A. Macro Risk
  • Risk of dramatic abrupt changes in biz
    environ.
  • that will influence all foreign operations.
  • (e.g.
    )
  • B. Micro risk
  • Risk of less dramatic but more prevalent changes
  • in biz environ. that will influence only a
    specific
  • firm/industry.
  • (e.g.
    )

6
  • Political
    Risk
  • Possible outcome
  • a. b.
  • c. d.
  • e. f.
  • g.
  • Forecasting Political Risk
  • a. ASPRO index by Shell Oil Co.
  • b. BERI index by Business International
    Corp.
  • c. PSSI index by (Haendel-West).
  • d. IRIS index by PRS group

7
  • Inverted U-curve
    Theory
  • Country Political Frustration (expectation
    - econ. reality)
  • risk
    income
  • LDC
  • NIC
  • Developed
  • political
  • risk

  • level of
  • low middle
    high income/

  • development

NICs
high
Developed
LDC
low
8
  • China
    India
  • Political
  • Economic
  • orientation
  • Economy size 10.2 Trillion
    4.2 triilion
  • (
    7,700/capita)
    (3,800/capita)
  • Unemployment 4.2
    7.8
  • Savings rate 50
    26
  • Socio-cultural
  • Population 1.32 bil
    1.1 bil
  • religion not a serious factor
    serious factor
  • (

    (multi-religious)
  • language Chinese
    English
  • advantage

9
  • Currency Crisis
  • Typical Pattern
  • 1. growing economy.
  • 2. foreign capital inflow.
  • 3. stock/real estate market boom.
  • 4. buy, spend and borrow more.
  • 5. debt exceeds beyond their capacity.
  • 6. foreign banks stop lending.
  • 7. risk of default (sovereign risk) rises.
  • 8. foreign capital outflow.
  • 9. stock market crash.
  • 10.currency crisis.

10
  • Causes of the crisis
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • US concerns
  • 1)
  • 2)
  • 3)

11
  • Two theories associated with Latin countries
  • Modernization vs. Dependencia
  • Modernization theory it placed the blame for
    under-
  • development on cultural values they are
    under-
  • developed because their societies are
    insufficiently
  • modern, socially and psychologically.
    Underdevelop-
  • ment is thus a locally rooted problem such as
    culture.
  • Dependencia theory In favor of a neo-Marxist
    formulation,
  • it placed blame on the process of world
    capitalist
  • integration under which a group of countries
    are
  • deliberately situated to be dependent and
    exploited by
  • some dominant countries. It contends that the
    problem
  • of underdevelopment could not be solved
    individually
  • unless otherwise the whole international
    system changes.

12
  • Calvo Doctrine
  • The Calvo Doctrine is a foreign policy doctrine
    which holds that
  • jurisdiction in international investment
    disputes lies with the host
  • country where the investment is located. An
    investor, under this
  • doctrine, has no recourse but to use the local
    courts, rather than
  • those of their home country. The principle,
    published in 1869 by
  • Carlos Calvo, an Argentine jurist, has been
    applied throughout
  • Latin America and other areas of the world.
  • It has since been incorporated as a part of
    many Latin American
  • constitutions, as well as many other treaties,
    statutes, and
  • contracts. The doctrine is used chiefly in
    concession agreements,
  • the clause attempting to give local courts
    final jurisdiction and to
  • obviate any appeal to diplomatic (or armed)
    intervention.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com