Title: Wazzup this week
1Wazzup this week?
- M W Arguing Communication Practices from
Ethical Perspectives - Due in Lab
- READ Evaluating WWW Sources
- COMPLETE Support Materials Tutorials I II
- (5 pts. each for LAB WORK on tutorials)
- Mini Argument Papers Returned
2Communication Controversy O the Day Report
- Snooze Boozers
- Lindsay Beard
- Valerie Johnson
- Marissa Maddy
- Sally Warren
3Moving On . . . Whos Up Next?
- First Group
- Ashley Closterman
- Venita Cooper
- Bryan McMahn
- Ryan Schreiber
- Emily Welch
4The Generic Ballot . . .
- A. YES . . .
- (pro, affirmative)
- B. NO . . .
- (con / negative)
5The ETHICS of our ARGUMENTS
- Two very important reasons why we should care
about the ethical implications of what and how we
communicate
6Reason 1 YOU (and everyone) gotta believe
like I do (e)
- Translating ones
- Personal values beliefs
- into a . . .
- Public ethic of societal behavior
7The Individual vs. Society (e)
-
- SOCIAL ORDER CONTINNUM
- Relativism Moral Certainty
-
- - - - - - - - - -
8You (Society) Decide . . .
9The Individual vs. Society (e)
- SOCIAL ORDER CONTINNUM
- Relativism Moral Certainty
-
- - - - - - - - - -
10Reason 2 Our Messages Create or Destroy (e)
- When we communicate with another, we change that
person, ourselves, our relationship, the world
11What happens when we communicate??? (e)
- COMMUNICATION
- (CO)----(MUNIA)
- CO Mutual
- MUNIA Give / receive gifts
- Communion
- Community
12Major Ethical Perspectives (E)
- 1. Political (Democratic) Perspective
- 2. Human Nature Perspective
- 3. Dialogical Perspective
- 4. Situational Perspective
13YOUR Ethical Assumptions at Work
- It is NOT ACCEPTABLE (i.e. WRONG) for the KKK to
Adopt-a-Spot - clan discriminates against others in our
community - all citizens are worthy of respect
- anything(one) that does not treat ALL citizens
with dignity respect should not be allowed
(promoted or recognized by the state) - Human Nature Perspective
14YOUR Ethical Assumptions at Work
- It is ACCEPTABLE (i.e. RIGHT) for the KKK to pick
up trash - Other groups get to participate
- Govt. must treat all groups / people equally (no
matter their personal beliefs) - Any program that does not treat all groups
equally is wrong (unethical) - Political Democratic Perspective
15Analyzing Each Perspective (E)
- Focus
- Whats most important?
- Assumptions
- Rules of the perspective?
- Conclusion
- How should communication function?
16Major Ethical Perspectives (E)
- Political (Democratic) Perspective
- 2. Human Nature Perspective
- 3. Dialogical Perspective
- 4. Situational Perspective
17Political (Democratic) Perspective (E)
- Focus
- Do communication practices promote the values and
procedures necessary for democracy? - What are those values / procedures?
18Democratic Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Do communication practices acknowledge (allow)
basic democratic freedoms? -
- (e.g. speech, press, assembly)
-
- e.g.
- --MU students rebel flag in dorm
- --MU Pro Life picture panels
- --MU student radio station obscene music
19Democratic Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Is deception involved?
- (Is all necessary information available for
informed decision making?) - e.g.
- Govt. communicating w/ citizens
- Media (e.g. CBS News) reporting
- Corporate communication scandals
- (e.g. tobacco, Ford / tire manufacturer, etc.)
20Democratic Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Do communication practices allow / promote
diversity of voices? - (opposing views / multiple perspectives)
- e.g. --public access TV in communities
- --corporate ownership of media
-
21Democratic Perspective (E)
- Conclusion
- Communication practices that limit or violate
these fundamental political values (freedom,
deception, diversity of views) should be
condemned as unethical and reformed.
22Your Opinion . . .
- OK for US Govt. to monitor phone / e-mail comm.
of US citizens w/o search warrant - NOT OK for US Govt. to monitor phone / e-mail
comm. of US citizens w/o search warrant