APAG Ch' 6 Civil Rights: Beyond Equal Protection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

APAG Ch' 6 Civil Rights: Beyond Equal Protection

Description:

13. What have been the different views on affirmative action with the two political parties? ... language of instruction was not a significant political issue. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: rodney9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: APAG Ch' 6 Civil Rights: Beyond Equal Protection


1
APAG Ch. 6Civil Rights Beyond Equal Protection
  • Assignment 1 PP. 177-183

2
  • What is affirmative action? What has happened to
    it since the mid 1990s?

3
  • Affirmative action is a policy in educational
    admissions or job hiring that gives special
    consideration or compensatory treatment to
    traditionally disadvantaged groups in an effort
    to overcome present effects of past
    discrimination.
  • Since the mid 1990s, the Supreme Court has ruled
    against racial preferences, especially in college
    admissions.

4
  • 2. What did the Supreme Court rule in the
    University of California v. Bakke decision?

5
  • The Court upheld affirmative action but ruled
    that race cannot be the sole criteria for
    admissions to college or hiring.

6
  • 3. What was Proposition 209? How did affect
    minority enrollment in the university system?

7
  • Proposition 209 was voted into law in California
    outlawing state programs that discriminated
    againstor gave preferences toindividuals based
    on their race.
  • The percentage of Hispanics and Blacks enrolled
    have dropped.

8
  • 4. How did the president of the California
    university system compensate for Proposition 209?

9
  • The president of the university system put into
    effect a top 4 percent plan that allowed the
    top 4 of students from certain low-performing
    and predominantly minority high schools automatic
    admission to Berkley and Los Angeles.

10
  • 5. Why is affirmative action difficult to
    implement?

11
  • The U.S. has numerous minority groups, as well as
    many multiracial Americans, many of whom cannot
    be pigeonholed into a legal minority group.

12
  • 6. What was the basic problem with the Civil
    Rights Act of 1964 when it came to employment of
    minorities? What did the federal government use
    to remedy this problem?

13
  • The basic problem was that minority groups and
    women, because of past discrimination, often
    lacked the education and skill to compete
    effectively in the marketplace.
  • Affirmative action was used to level the playing
    field by giving special preferences in
    educational admissions and employment decisions.

14
  • 7. Who started affirmative action? Who was
    required to follow its policies?

15
  • Affirmative action was started by Lyndon Johnson
    in 1965.
  • All government agencies (federal, state and
    local), companies that sold goods and services to
    the federal govt., institutions that received
    federal funds, and finally, labor unions and
    companies that were found to be discriminatory in
    the past.

16
  • 8. Who has been hurt by affirmative action? What
    is at issue in the current debate over it?

17
  • White males was the predominant group hurt by
    affirmative action.
  • At issue in the current debate is whether such
    programs, because of the inherently
    discriminatory nature, violate the equal
    protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

18
  • 9. Describe the Alan Bakke case.

19
  • Alan Bakke sued the University of California at
    Davis because he found that his academic record
    was better than those of some of the minority
    applicants who had been admitted to their medical
    program. He alleged reverse discrimination and
    that the university violated his rights under the
    equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

20
  • 10. What was the effect of the Courts decision
    in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena?

21
  • The Courts opinion in Adarand means that an
    affirmative action program cannot make use of
    quotas or preferences for unqualified persons,
    and once it has succeeded in achieving that
    compelling government interest, the program must
    be changed or dropped.

22
  • 11. How did the Hopwood v. State of Texas case
    further limit affirmative action?

23
  • The Hopwood case stated that the use of race even
    as a means of achieving diversity on college
    campuses undercuts the 14th Amendment.

24
  • 12. What two states have made affirmative action
    illegal?

25
  • California and Washington

26
  • 13. What have been the different views on
    affirmative action with the two political parties?

27
  • Democrats usually support affirmative actions
    policies while Republicans have opposed them.

28
  • 14. Describe the changes in language policies of
    the U.S. beginning in the 19th century.

29
  • In the 19th century, the language of instruction
    was not a significant political issue. Children
    were taught in a wide variety of languages, with
    German being the most common foreign language.
  • By the beginning of the 20th century with a large
    wave on new immigrants from Europe, many feared a
    babel of tongues.

30
  • Anti-German sentiments from WWI caused 37 states
    to pass laws restricting foreign-language
    instruction.
  • English-only instruction became the norm
    throughout the country.
  • With the large number of Hispanics immigrating in
    the 1950s, bilingual education programs began.

31
  • 1968, The Bilingual Education Act passed that
    required bilingual programs.
  • 1974, the Supreme Court upheld these programs in
    Lau v. Nichols.

32
  • 15. How does bilingual education work? How did
    todays bilingual education programs come about?

33
  • Bilingual education programs teach children in
    their native language while also teaching them
    English.
  • These programs are a result of the government
    policies favoring multiculturalism that grew out
    of the civil rights movement.

34
  • 16. What was the Supreme Court case that upheld
    bilingual education?

35
  • Lau v. Nichols

36
  • 17. What happened to bilingual education in
    California?

37
  • In 1998 California residents passed a ballot
    initiative that called for the end of bilingual
    education programs in that state. It allowed
    English-immersion programs which give intensive
    instruction in English for a limited period of
    time and then placed in regular classrooms.
  • The Court has upheld this law thus ending
    bilingual education in California.

38
  • 19. What is the official language of the U.S.?
    Do you believe the nation should have an
    English-only law when it comes to governmental
    operationsschools, hospitals, public
    transportation, public accommodations, etc.?

39
  • There is no official language required in the
    U.S.
  • Opinion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com