Title: NCMA 24th Annual Government Contract Management Conference
1(No Transcript)
2Using A-76 to achieve the best results for the
taxpayer
Breakout Session Competitive Sourcing Cathy
Garman Senior Vice President, Contract Services
Association (703-243-2020 cathy_at_csa-dc.org) Date
December 6, 2005 Time 1120a.m. -1230p.m.
3A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Performance of Commercial Activities
- In the process of governing, the Government
should not compete with its citizens - National Policy Promulgated in 1955
- OMB A-76 Circular issued in 1966
4A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Circular revised in 1967, 1979, 1983
- Major revision in 1996
- Detailed outline on how to conduct public-private
competitions - Two-step process
- Viewed as unfair by all parties
- Mostly used at Department of Defense (though
there was a moratorium on DOD use in early 90s)
5A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act
passed October, 1998 - Mandates Annual Agency Inventories
- Statutory definition of inherently governmental
- Requires review for competing agency commercial
activities - Sunshine on agency commercial activities
- Over 900,000 Federal positions identified as
commercial in nature jobs normally performed by
the private sector
6A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Commercial Activities Panel Report (www.gao.gov)
- The FY 01 National Defense Authorization Act
created a Blue Ribbon Panel to study competitive
sourcing process and related issues. Industry,
government, and public sector unions represented - Unanimous agreement on 10 sourcing principles
- Recommendations focused on providing best value,
promoting competition, valuing people, moving
to FAR process - Provided basis for revisions to A-76 Circular
7A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Latest Revisions were released on May 29, 2003.
- Initial reactions were split reactions hated by
public sector unions, industry cautiously
supportive (implementation is the key) same
attitude today - Key Points in Revisions
- Standard competitions shall not exceed 12 months
intended to provide more reasonable time frame
for conducting public-private competitions in
line with normal procurements - Special streamlined competition (for under 65
FTEs) not to exceed 90 days - 10 cost differential maintained for all standard
competitions eliminated for streamlined (to help
small business)
8A-76 A Historical Perspective
- May 2003 A-76 Revisions, cont.
- FAR-like process, based on best value
- Provides for exclusion of government bidder if
deficient - Better accountability (for both public and
private sector winners) - Performance periods must be the same for the
agency tender offer and the private sector offers
minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 5 years for
standard competitions - If the in-house tender offer wins, the MEO must
compete again at the end of the performance
period, just like under a private sector
contract. BUT, agency can declare MEO a high
performing organization and exempt from
competition for an extra time period
9A-76 A Historical Perspective
- Legislative Response to Revisions
- One year prohibition on A-76 studies for DOD
(2004) - House approved language to prohibit funds to be
expended to implement revised Circular - Further restrictions considered in annual
appropriations bills - Eliminate streamlined
- Mandated cost differential for all competitions
10A-76 Recent Results
- Administration favors competition no matter who
wins (public or private sector) - OMB studies show significant potential savings
- But will they be fully realized?
- Agencies winning 90 of competitions
- Industry is walking away from A-76 competitions
11A-76 Why should we still care?
- Benefits of competitive sourcing
- time savings
- cost savings
- project delivery guarantees
- access to new skills
- increased innovation (e.g., a government
employee with an innovative idea facing
institutional barriers to change) - allows agency to focus on core mission
- best value
- risk sharing
12A-76 Why should we still care?
- Looking at A-76 differently
- Glenn Davidson, President, EquaTerra Public
Sector and - Tom Luedtke, Assistant Administrator for
Procurement, NASA Headquarters