NCMA 24th Annual Government Contract Management Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

NCMA 24th Annual Government Contract Management Conference

Description:

... Sourcing. Cathy Garman. Senior Vice President, Contract Services ... In the process of governing, the Government should not compete with its citizens ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: davidd3
Learn more at: http://www.ncmahq.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NCMA 24th Annual Government Contract Management Conference


1
(No Transcript)
2
Using A-76 to achieve the best results for the
taxpayer
Breakout Session Competitive Sourcing Cathy
Garman Senior Vice President, Contract Services
Association (703-243-2020 cathy_at_csa-dc.org) Date
December 6, 2005 Time 1120a.m. -1230p.m.
3
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Performance of Commercial Activities
  • In the process of governing, the Government
    should not compete with its citizens
  • National Policy Promulgated in 1955
  • OMB A-76 Circular issued in 1966

4
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Circular revised in 1967, 1979, 1983
  • Major revision in 1996
  • Detailed outline on how to conduct public-private
    competitions
  • Two-step process
  • Viewed as unfair by all parties
  • Mostly used at Department of Defense (though
    there was a moratorium on DOD use in early 90s)

5
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act
    passed October, 1998
  • Mandates Annual Agency Inventories
  • Statutory definition of inherently governmental
  • Requires review for competing agency commercial
    activities
  • Sunshine on agency commercial activities
  • Over 900,000 Federal positions identified as
    commercial in nature jobs normally performed by
    the private sector

6
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Commercial Activities Panel Report (www.gao.gov)
  • The FY 01 National Defense Authorization Act
    created a Blue Ribbon Panel to study competitive
    sourcing process and related issues. Industry,
    government, and public sector unions represented
  • Unanimous agreement on 10 sourcing principles
  • Recommendations focused on providing best value,
    promoting competition, valuing people, moving
    to FAR process
  • Provided basis for revisions to A-76 Circular

7
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Latest Revisions were released on May 29, 2003.
  • Initial reactions were split reactions hated by
    public sector unions, industry cautiously
    supportive (implementation is the key) same
    attitude today
  • Key Points in Revisions
  • Standard competitions shall not exceed 12 months
    intended to provide more reasonable time frame
    for conducting public-private competitions in
    line with normal procurements
  • Special streamlined competition (for under 65
    FTEs) not to exceed 90 days
  • 10 cost differential maintained for all standard
    competitions eliminated for streamlined (to help
    small business)

8
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • May 2003 A-76 Revisions, cont.
  • FAR-like process, based on best value
  • Provides for exclusion of government bidder if
    deficient
  • Better accountability (for both public and
    private sector winners)
  • Performance periods must be the same for the
    agency tender offer and the private sector offers
    minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 5 years for
    standard competitions
  • If the in-house tender offer wins, the MEO must
    compete again at the end of the performance
    period, just like under a private sector
    contract. BUT, agency can declare MEO a high
    performing organization and exempt from
    competition for an extra time period

9
A-76 A Historical Perspective
  • Legislative Response to Revisions
  • One year prohibition on A-76 studies for DOD
    (2004)
  • House approved language to prohibit funds to be
    expended to implement revised Circular
  • Further restrictions considered in annual
    appropriations bills
  • Eliminate streamlined
  • Mandated cost differential for all competitions

10
A-76 Recent Results
  • Administration favors competition no matter who
    wins (public or private sector)
  • OMB studies show significant potential savings
  • But will they be fully realized?
  • Agencies winning 90 of competitions
  • Industry is walking away from A-76 competitions

11
A-76 Why should we still care?
  • Benefits of competitive sourcing
  • time savings
  • cost savings
  • project delivery guarantees
  • access to new skills
  • increased innovation (e.g., a government
    employee with an innovative idea facing
    institutional barriers to change)
  • allows agency to focus on core mission
  • best value
  • risk sharing

12
A-76 Why should we still care?
  • Looking at A-76 differently
  • Glenn Davidson, President, EquaTerra Public
    Sector and
  • Tom Luedtke, Assistant Administrator for
    Procurement, NASA Headquarters
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com