Title: Experience from Online Course Delivery at KFUPM
1Experience from Online Course Delivery at KFUPM
Presentation Headings
- Dr. Mahmoud M. Dawoud
- Department of Electrical Engineering
- King Fahd University of Petroleum Minerals
2Outline
- Introduction
- Course Delivery Software checklist
- Course Delivery
- Another University Experience
- Online Course Delivery at KFUPM
- ICS Course
- First Group of Online Courses Including EE 200
- Student Survey Results
- Conclusion
3Introduction
- An overview of online course delivery methods
will be presented. Issues related to the delivery
and management of online courses will be
considered. Experience of Online course delivery
at KFUPM will be discussed. Experience of
supplementary, mixed and fully online delivery
methods will be exposed. -
- The delivery of the EE200 "Digital Logic Circuit
Design" online course and students feedback will
be highlighted
4Online Course Delivery Software
Many online delivery software products are
available. Some examples are listed
- Blackboard
- Convene
- Embanet
- eCollege.com
- Intralearn
- Symposium
- TopClass
- WebCT
- The Learning Manager
- WebMentor
- ..
5Web-Course Development Checklist
- Welcoming page
- Syllabus
- Assignment
- Lessons
- Communications
- Resources
- Course calendar
- .
6Course Delivery
- Instructor-Led face-to-face courses
- Instructor-Led on-line courses
- Combination courses (On-line elements, and
face-to-face elements)
7Course Delivery
- Supplemental
- Blended
- Fully on-line
8Another University Experience
Face-to-Face, Online, or a Hybrid Students
Reactions to Multiple Course Delivery Modes,
Brian Miller, University of Delaware
- Investigation to identify the effect of
undergraduate students attitude toward the
learning experience, when adding web based course
management tools to the traditional face-to-face
delivery mode - Course content delivered to 938 students using
four different levels of course management tools - All students received the instruction under the
same instructor - Results showed that effective use of Web based
course management tools can have positive effect
on students attitudes toward the instruction
9Another University Experience
Face-to-Face, Online, or a Hybrid Students
Reactions to Multiple Course Delivery Modes,
Brian Miller, University of Delaware
- The four levels of course management tools are
- Traditional Face-to-Face 214
- Static dual mode (F2F, plus website for syllabus,
practice quizzes, and study guides) 428 - Dynamic dual mode (F2F, plus Website including
dynamic course material and activities,
interactive syllabus with hyperlinks to online
material) 214 - Online delivery mode (all course material
received via the internet using WebCT course
management software 86
10Another University Experience
Face-to-Face, Online, or a Hybrid Students
Reactions to Multiple Course Delivery Modes,
Brian Miller, University of Delaware
- The findings of this research are
- Using web based tools with F2F instruction did
not have significant effect on students overall
reporting of satisfaction with the instructional
delivery when comparing among the four groups.
- However, the following are key results to the
study - Students in the hybrid course delivery reported
significantly more course value than F2F or
online. - When the course is delivered part or whole via
internet students found it harder than was
reported by the F2F. - Hybrid treatment groups reported that the pace of
the course was quicker than the other two groups. - Groups receiving instructions through internet
reported that the work required in the course was
more than what was reported by the other groups. - The two hybrid groups reported greater
satisfaction of the instructors efforts than was
reported by the other groups. - The results suggest that instructors should
consider implementing web based course management
tools with routine F2F contact with the
instructor and provide multiple dynamic learning
activities.
11Online Course Delivery at KFUPM
- Online course delivery experience at KFUPM will
be discussed base on - Delivery of ICS on line course ICS 202 (Dr.
Sahalu Junaidu) - Delivery of the first group of courses, supported
by Elearning center, Deanship od Academic
Development (KFUPM). - EE 200
- EE 203
- ME 315
- PHYS 101
12ICS Course
- A study was made to investigate the effectiveness
of an e-learning course at KFUPM (ICS 202),and
the completion rate. Also to compare the results
with similar studies. - The course is delivered almost completely online.
- A single weekly meeting instead of the
traditional three meetings. - The meeting was used as a Q-A session, as well as
taking a quiz. - Lab. was conducted in the traditional manner.
- NYU onlines research showed that one hour live
session for every four hours of self-paced study
was a highly effective mix. - Results were given for the scoring, drop rate,
and course GPA for five semesters. - Results showed insignificant difference in
scoring. More drop-out rate in the online group,
and higher course GPA for the online course. - The online results were better, probably due to
students ability, lab component, and more
frequent assessment.
13First Group of Online courses Including EE200
- The courses were delivered as supplementary
material. - Different levels of blending between F2F and use
of the online material were used. - EE 200 The online course material was made
available to all students registered in 8
sections (180 students). The students were
encouraged to utilize the material for revision,
catching up on material, and practicing self
tests. They were also encouraged to make use of
the high level interactivity and animations. - EE 203 The online material was considered a
supplementary material. Communication tools were
utilized for discussion and announcement.
Practice quizzes were used by students to
evaluate their understanding. Participation in
the discussion board was included in grading
students
14First Group of Online courses Including EE200
- ME 315 The course was conducted in hybrid mode.
The board and chalk were used wherever there are
derivations and new formulations. However, once
the instructor go through them on the board, he
repeats them again using the online materials to
consolidate students understanding. - PHYS 101 The course is delivered entirely as
supplementary. There was no compulsion on the
part of the students to log in. However the
instructor gave some incentives like bonus points
for completing one assignment online
15Statistics About EE200 Access by Students
- The total number of students registered in
(041) 180 - The number of students who accessed the online
course web page 177 - The number of students who filled the course
survey 82 -
- Number of hits Number of students
- gt 650 1
- gt 500 4
- gt 400 9
- gt 300 17
- gt 200 37
- gt 100 100
- gt 50 132
- gt 3 177
16Students Survey Results
- Students appreciated the following
- The use of graphics and animation
- The lesson objectives at the start of each lesson
- The use of online communication methods
- The organization of the online lectures
- They also showed some dissatisfaction with
- The number of examples used within the courses
- The technical reliability of some courses that
use slide shows with voice, developed in
Macromedia Authorware - Using the online lectures from computers at home
-
17Conclusion
- Online course delivery is an important issue,
which has to be planned ahead of time - Full coordination between e-learning center and
the departments is important for deciding the
most suitable means of delivery for an online
course. This issue differs depending on the type
of course - A highly successful online course delivery
scheme, is the one which includes the traditional
F2F phase - Technical reliability issues have to be
addressed, so that online material can be
accessed without difficulty from the different
locations of the learners -
18