The New Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The New Europe

Description:

The EU versus the US? OR. Why Integration? ... Politics and Policy. Is New Europe committed to being 'European'? Pro-US or pro-EU? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: sethstr
Category:
Tags: europe | new

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The New Europe


1
The New Europe
  • Whats Next?

2
Where is Europe Going?
  • Superstate?
  • The EU versus the US?

OR
  • Just another experiment?

3
Why Integration?
  • Economic interdependence reduces likelihood of
    conflict
  • Gains from peace outweigh gains from conflict
  • Collaboration leads to communication and mutual
    understanding
  • Economic integration can demand political,
    policy, legal, and social integration
  • Assumes common interests and perspectives!

4
A Brief History
  • 1951 European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)
  • Material impossibility of war
  • 1952 Common Defense and Political Communities
    (EDC and EPC)
  • Too far, too fast
  • 1957 Treaties of Rome
  • European Economic Community (EEC)
  • Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
  • Euratom National Security (and France)

5
The European Common Market
  • 1986 Single European Act
  • The Common Market
  • Competitiveness
  • Europe 1992
  • Economic integration
  • Monetary Union and the Euro
  • 1992 Maastricht Treaty

6
Maastricht and Beyond
  • Three Pillars
  • European Community
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy
  • Justice and Home Affairs
  • Deepening Integration
  • Progress towards economic, monetary, and
    political union
  • The EU Constitution
  • Widening Integration
  • EU Expansion

7
The New Europe
  • Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia,
    Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovak Republic, and
    Slovenia (2004), Romania and Bulgaria (2007)
  • The Future?
  • Turkey, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia,
    Montenegro, Macedonia, and Albania

8
What Does New Europe Mean?
  • New Economies
  • Catching up, but still far behind Old Europe
  • 9,831 per-capita GDP compared to 39,700
  • Competitive
  • Emigration of excess workforce
  • New Democracies
  • Uncertain commitment
  • New Perspectives
  • Pro-US, Pro-Expansion?
  • Moving East?

9
Why the EU?
  • Gains From Economic Integration
  • Access to European markets
  • EU aid and subsidies
  • Political Cover
  • Counterweight to Russian Federation
  • Reform, conditionality and lock-in
  • 1993 Copenhagen Criteria

10
Areas of Conflict
  • Economics and Trade
  • Competition with Old Europe
  • Emigration to Old Europe
  • Politics and Policy
  • Competing influences
  • The New Europe in EU politics
  • Security
  • Terrorism and crime

11
Economic Issues
  • Economic Competition
  • New Europe can lure investment with lower taxes
    and wages
  • Emigration
  • Polish Plumber problem cheap labor drives down
    wages in E-15
  • Brain drain and the Irish disease
  • New Europe loses the young and capable
  • Marginalization in Western Europe

12
Politics and Policy
  • Is New Europe committed to being European?
  • Pro-US or pro-EU?
  • Can free migration disrupt or dilute Old European
    states?
  • Are New Europeans sufficiently European?
  • What ensures that democracy and free markets will
    continue in the long run?
  • Reform fatigue
  • Lustration, democracy, and civil liberties

13
Security
  • What impact will New European access have on the
    EU?
  • The Schengen Area and security
  • Crime and trafficking
  • Terrorism
  • How does the E-15 see the world?

14
Can Expansion Work?
  • What is expansion supposed to do?
  • Security Communities and Perpetual Peace
  • Economic growth and stability
  • European Power
  • How well does it do this?
  • Common perspectives and interests?
  • Long-term performance
  • Stability and Survival?

15
Competing Perspectives
  • Realist
  • States are driven by interests and will only
    cooperate so long as it benefits them
  • Neoliberal
  • States learn that cooperation results in gains
    and are willing to compromise to achieve these
    gains
  • Constructivist
  • Through cooperation states learn to identify
    with common values and interests

16
Realism and the EU
  • The EU only reflects the interests of its most
    powerful members
  • The EU only survives because it benefits these
    states
  • If something goes wrong (currency crisis,
    disaster, etc), states will cut their losses and
    abandon the EU

17
Neoliberalism and the EU
  • The EU meets the interests of member states more
    effectively than they could on their own
  • Trade
  • Policy coordination
  • Disruptions will encourage cooperative resolution
    rather than fragmentation
  • Long-term gains v. short-term losses
  • Ineffective responses will undermine EU

18
Constructivism and the EU
  • Membership in the EU changes the perspectives and
    interests of individual policy-makers and leaders
  • Socialization leads states to perceive their
    interests as being in-line with the EU
  • States adapt policies and domestic institutions
    to support and enhance continued membership
  • Common identities and perspectives develop and
    cement Union in face of crises

19
How Does New Europe Fit In?
  • Can socialization overcome differences between
    E-15 and E-10?
  • Are there limits to how well EU policies can meet
    the needs of member states?
  • How far are states willing to go towards
    integration?
  • What role will the U.S. and the Russian
    Federation play?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com