Strange Bedfellows - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Strange Bedfellows

Description:

Sun Communities of Interest / Centers of Excellence. Cornell. Duke ... New ILS and Oracle expertise. End of MyLibrary development. ad hoc e-matrix committee ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Pac78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strange Bedfellows


1
Strange Bedfellows
The Ultimate Digital Library
  • When Libraries, Vendors, and Dot-coms Meet

Where the New Information Players Meet
Insert shameless self-promotion here
www.ala.org/editions
Andrew K. Pace Head, Systems NCSU
Libraries andrew_pace_at_ncsu.edu
2
Who is this guy?
for those of you not familiar with my
opinionated (and semi-informed) rants on
listservs, in CIL, SLN, AL, and from atop various
soapboxes.
  • Graduated from library school in 1996
  • Innovative Interfaces, 1996 - 1999
  • first year on the Help Desk
  • Product Manager WebPAC, Advanced Keyword,
    Z39.50,
  • KidsOnline, Ereserves, etc.
  • NCSU Libraries, 1999
  • DRASIRSI Web2, laptop lending, MyLibrary,
    ebooks, etc.
  • Liaison to Digital Library Initiatives
  • self-appointed library ombudsman
  • Journalistic Soapboxes
  • Computers in Libraries, Coming Full Circle,
    2000-current
  • Smart Libraries Newsletter, contributing editor,
    2002-2004
  • American Libraries, Technically Speaking,
    2004-current

3
(No Transcript)
4
Strange bedfellows, indeed
  • Libraries and Vendors
  • The Dark Side Library Vendors
  • The Conversation Sheep in Wolves clothing
  • The Competition Internet dot-coms
  • The Philosophical Bridge Standards

5
The Dark Side
  • Cant we all just get along?

The question of who is to do library
automationlibrarians or computer expertsis no
longer meaningful. --Richard De
Gennaro, 1968
6
From Co-dependence to Co-development
  • Market testing Development
  • Vendor-Library partnerships
  • Beware the homegrown backlash
  • Getting Vendors to listen
  • Listening to Vendors
  • When mutual listening becomes conversation
  • Stealing from the Best

Beast
7
Market testing Development
  • 1980-2000 ? Vendor developed product
    specifications (the vacuum plan)
  • 2000-2004 ? Library developed product
    specifications (the table-turning plan)
  • 2004 and beyond ? Co-developed product
    specifications

8
Vendor-Library Partnerships
  • Sun Communities of Interest / Centers of
    Excellence
  • Cornell
  • Duke University
  • NCSU

9
Vendor-Library Partnerships
  • Ebooks.com Consultative Services

10
Beware the Homegrown Backlash
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
  • Why I fear open source
  • wheres the open source marketing?
  • wheres the open source documentation?
  • wheres the open source help desk?

11
Getting Vendors to Listen
How about because. Is because good enough for
you?
12
Getting Vendors to Listen
OpenURL
  • NCSU Libraries
  • 255 Online Databases from 70 providers
  • Over 5000 full electronic journals
  • 30,700 activated titles in our SFX Knowledge Base
  • 12,735 distinct ISSNs
  • Before SFX Implementation, EJournal Finder was
    searched 350,000 times in one year 40 more than
    the year before
  • 9M annual collections budget
  • 6M for serials
  • 3.9M for print serials

13
Why should publishers care as much as libraries
do?
  • What goes around, comes around
  • The Value Proposition if libraries want it, our
    providers should offer it
  • MetaSearch needs standard data too

14
Reciprocity Works
  • The Web is a reciprocal environment
  • If libraries and users want it, and OpenURL
    increases incoming traffic, its a win for
    everyone
  • Publishers must be sources and targets

15
Libraries Comparison Shop
  • Shrinking budgets
  • Increasing sophistication
  • System development must match development needs
  • ERM System evaluation

OpenURL Compliant?
16
Killing Two Birds with One Stone
  • Minimal metasearch records
  • Cross-fertilization
  • Developmental dove-tailing

17
Getting Vendors to Listen
MetaSearch
  • NCSU Libraries
  • 255 Online Databases from 70 providers
  • 125 metasearchabe (from 7 vendors)
  • 130 not metasearchable (from over 75 vendors)
  • Vendors
  • Putting all of their resources into search
    instead of content and metadata normalization

18
Getting Vendors to Listen
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all metadata are not created equal.
We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall
all hang separately.
19
Dont Forget to Listen
  • Radio Frequency IDs (RFID)
  • Digital Asset Management (DAM)
  • MetaSearch
  • Electronic Resource Management (ERM)

20
Classic Integrated System
MARC Records
Patron Records
Patron self-service
WEBPAC
circ transactions
  • websites (856)
  • e-books
  • e-journals
  • databases
  • datasets

reserve records
item holdings
serial holdings
Acquisitions Records
Serials Control Records
21
Dis-integrated Library System
  • Licensing Files
  • ILL Files
  • Collection Management Files
  • Helpdesk Files
  • Statistical Files

alpha list of databases
subject list of databases
web subject guides
Authentication Authorization
  • websites (856)
  • e-books
  • e-journals
  • databases

e-journal finder
institutional repository
Serials Solutions
TDNet
SFX
alert services
MyLibrary
22
Opportunities
  • No entrenched legacy database
  • New ILS and Oracle expertise
  • End of MyLibrary development
  • ? ad hoc e-matrix committee

23
NCSU Libraries E-matrix
  • The ad hoc E-Matrix Committee will implement a
    prototype electronic resources management system
    to support acquisition and licensing, collection
    management, and resource discovery for the
    Libraries' electronic resources

24
NCSU Libraries E-matrix
  • define the need
  • survey best practices and related local and
    national initiatives
  • define functional specifications for the system
  • build a data model which maximizes opportunities
    for present and future interoperability with
    existing systems (e.g., ILS, MyLibrary, Serials
    Solutions, PeopleSoft) and utilization of
    existing or emerging standards (e.g., OpenURL,
    EDI, XML)
  • implement a prototype.

25
Electronic Resource Management
Vendor Efforts
Library Efforts
  • Innovative Interfaces ERM
  • Endeavor ENCompass
  • Sirsi SingleSearch
  • Ex Libris MetaLib
  • CARL Goldrush
  • EBSCO EJS
  • MuseGlobal
  • Various Ejournal Finders
  • DLF Electronic Resource Management Initiative
  • California Digital Library
  • Cornell University
  • Emory University
  • Griffith University
  • Johns Hopkins
  • Kansas State University
  • MIT
  • Penn State
  • Tri-CollegeConsortium
  • UCLA
  • University of Georgia
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Washington
  • Yale University

http//www.library.cornell.edu/cts/elicensestudy/
Or Googleweb hub
26
E-MATRIX
ADMINISTRATIVE METADATA
licensing
I L S
Website Catalog E-resources Alert
Services Local DBs Collections Digital
Archives
Data Repos- itories
subscript-ion info
statistics
E-MATRIX
DATA HOOKS
PRESENTATION LAYER
technical support
remote access
Other Databases E-journal finder ETDs Instnl
Repository Etc.
evaluative data
Evaluative Tools
vendor data
27
E-matrix Challenges
  • Public interface is secondary concern
  • Leveraging existing ILS data
  • Adherence to emerging standards
  • Avoid solutions looking for problems
  • Get rid of the E-

28
The Competition
29
The worst level of Internet service that users
will accept is the best level of service they
have ever seen.
-paraphrased from Ron Dunn, Thomson
Learning National Online 1999
30
User Focus
  • Library
  • Academic Disciplines
  • Library Promotion
  • Paid Subscription Access
  • Current Awareness
  • Personalized Links
  • Business
  • Credit Card Processing
  • Chat
  • Calendars (with user postings)
  • Classified Ads
  • Surveys / Polls
  • Personalized Links

vs.
31
Organizational Focus
  • Business
  • Money
  • Money
  • Money
  • IPO
  • Chapter 11
  • Library School
  • Library
  • Teaching and Learning
  • Information Literacy
  • Careful Selection
  • Human Contact

vs.
32
Dear Library Users, We apologize for making this
so difficult...
33
Radical Classification
34
Radical Classification
Local Marc Subfield r c Core resource n
Narrowly related resource b Broadly related
resource
35
Google-Style Quick-Search
Animal Control
36
WebFeat
Muse Global
37
Why a standard?
  • Because doing something uniformly across your own
    platform is NOT a standard,
  • and because wide adoption of a single solution is
    NOT a standard,
  • and just because yours is better than anyone
    elses does not mean that it is any good.

38
Standards to Watch
  • OpenURL
  • COUNTER
  • Shibboleth

Fledgling Standards to Watch
  • MetaSearch (NISO BA, BB, BC)
  • SRW/SRU
  • User Agent Identification

39
Conclusions
  • Leveraging information expertise
  • Valleys, Plateaus, and Mountains
  • Mutual Listening is called Conversation

40
Even Strange Bedfellows Can Dream
http//www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/presentations
Andrew K. Pace Head, Systems NCSU
Libraries andrew_pace_at_ncsu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com