The Transformations of Scientific Fields: Physics, Chemistry 1900-1945 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

The Transformations of Scientific Fields: Physics, Chemistry 1900-1945

Description:

Proportion of papers by country (journal publisher) ... Harkins, WD. Weyl, H. Schmidt, E. Trautz, M. Schur, I. Saurel, P. Langmuir, I. Synge, JL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: matthew250
Learn more at: http://vw.indiana.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Transformations of Scientific Fields: Physics, Chemistry 1900-1945


1
The Transformations of Scientific Fields
Physics, Chemistry1900-1945
Yves Gingras Canada Research Chair History and
Sociology of Science CIRST-UQAM
2
Distinctions between fields by journal title
3
Papers and References in Selected Source journals
(1900-1944)
4
Growth in number of researchers
5
Growth in the number of papers
6
Authors productivity
7
Collaborative research
8
Proportion of papers by country (journal
publisher)
Note other counties include Sweden, the
Netherlands, the USSR and Switzerland
9
Interdisciplinarity(defined by the journals
where scientists publish)
Top 10 interdisciplinary authors (1900-1945)
Maths-Phys Chem-Maths Chem-Phys
Bateman, H Loewy, A Harkins, WD
Weyl, H Schmidt, E Trautz, M
Schur, I Saurel, P Langmuir, I
Synge, JL Fischer, E Tammann, G
Bieberbach, L Meyer, E Hahn, O
Hopf, E Schmidt, H Eyring, H
Meyer, E Salkowski, E Tolman, RC
Klein, F Young, RC Huggins, ML
Larmor, J Muller, M Pauli, W
Polya, G Schmidt, R Mark, H
Chemistry 54,000 authors
Chemistry/Maths 130
Maths 2700 authors
Chemistry/Physics 2700
Physics 17,000 authors
All 3 disciplines 20
Maths/Physics 280
10
Country of origin of cited publication
11
Citations in chemistry journals
12
Citations in Physics Journals
13
Citations in Mathematics Journals
14
Impact of disciplines on one another
15
Citation statistics by country (1900-1944)
Cited
Chemistry Germany Other France UK USA
Germany 72.83 5.69 5.70 7.14 8.64
Other 36.21 35.57 5.79 10.28 12.15
France 39.43 6.96 37.94 7.38 8.29
UK 27.95 4.91 5.25 36.80 25.09
USA 25.03 6.31 5.35 13.79 49.52
Total 51.27 7.54 5.93 11.76 23.50
Citing
Cited
Physics Germany Other France UK USA
Germany 70.96 4.55 4.87 10.75 8.87
Other 32.04 29.47 3.34 16.44 18.71
France 32.70 5.61 39.02 13.14 9.54
UK 24.25 4.82 4.68 41.04 25.20
USA 21.72 4.81 3.61 16.24 53.62
Total 39.88 5.31 5.78 17.53 31.50
Citing
Cited
Maths Germany Other France UK USA
Germany 63.49 14.90 9.19 5.83 6.59
Other 31.70 28.30 23.43 7.70 8.88
UK 13.04 7.76 5.50 65.03 8.67
USA 21.32 10.55 7.03 12.52 48.57
Total 36.99 12.71 8.53 22.21 19.57
Citing
16
Citation statistics by discipline (1900-1944)
Bio / Med Chemistry General Engineering Maths Physics
Chemistry 9.00 74.94 9.11 0.98 0.02 5.95
Maths 1.58 0.13 21.67 0.41 70.35 5.87
Physics 1.78 12.50 21.41 3.22 0.57 60.51
Total 6.87 56.20 12.74 1.56 2.13 20.49
Cited
Citing
17
Gauging the country of publication of cited
articles
of articles produced by country UK USA Germany Other ()
Chemistry 6.36 31.51 55.24 6.89
Mathematics 14.17 30.57 49.43 5.83
Physics 18.88 41.49 32.89 6.74
() France is included in this category, since
the database poorly reflects the French journals
in Chemistry and Physics
Based on a semi-random sample of 300 physicists
and 500 chemists from each country() , we can
get an alternative idea of how the cited articles
are distributed
of articles cited by scientists in Chemistry Physics
France 11.15 12.08
Germany 38.70 30.67
Other 6.70 5.83
UK 19.95 25.83
USA 23.50 25.58
() There is insufficient data for the case of
mathematicians
18
Co-citation network of physicists, 1900-1904
(More than 8 co-citations).
19
Physics (1905-1911)
  • Co-citation network of top 50 most cited authors
  • Note two groups which emerge

Node sizes reflect number of citations, visible
ties for 11 co-citations or more
20
Multi-dimensional scaling and agglomerative
clustering
Electron theory
Ionization, atom
  • MDS provides a map based on the distances
    dissimilarities between citation patterns of
    the authors (top 50 most cited authors in
    physics, 1905-1911)
  • AHC then allows us to identify cluster of
    similar authors
  • In this case, it identifies two primary, distinct
    clusters, which are the same as those identified
    using the networks

Group 2
spectroscopy
Chemical physics
21
Word frequency in titles of citing papers
  • Group2 Ionization of gases, atomic model,
    emission spectra (Thomson, Stark, Wien,
    Riecke, Lenard, Warburg, Kayser)

Group 1 Special relativity and the photoelectric
effect (Einstein, Abraham, Lorentz, Drude, Planck)
Word Frequency
Radiation 34
Light 28
Relativity 24
Electrical 22
waves 20
metals 18
Dispersion 17
Magnetic 17
Heat 17
Electric 15
energy 15
Electromagnetic 14
Electron 13
Absorption 13
metal 13
method 12
moving 12
spectrum 12
Word Frequency
Light 55
rays 36
Radiation 35
Electrical 33
Discharge 28
Absorption 28
gases 27
Spectra 27
spectrum 23
lines 22
Cathode 22
Spectral 21
Emission 19
canal 19
Electricity 17
influence 17
Magnetic 17
22
Co-citation network of physicists, 1912-1918
(More than 10 co-citations).
23
Co-citation network of physicists, 1925-1930
(More than 16 co-citations)
24
Co-citation network of physicists, 1937-1944
(More than 21 co-citations)
25
Centrality Rankings 5-years periods
26
Co-citation network of authors in Mathematics
Journals (1900-1911)
27
Why We Cannot Predict Nobel Prizes...
Yves Gingras and Matthew Wallace CIRST-UQAM
28
Nobel prize winners and nominees
Number of physics nominees (1901-44) 813 Number
of physics winners (1901-44) 47
Number of chemistry nominees (1901-44)
756 Number of chemistry winners (1901-44) 43
29
Evolving profile of prize winners
(n43)
(n46)
(n71)
(n47)
(n42)
(n89)
30
Probability distribution of rankings 3 years
before and after the prize
(n172)
(n169)
(n166)
(n167)
Note that, in all cases, the winners centrality
provides a slightly better indicator (for the
highest ranks)
31
How does the distribution of winners rankings
evolve? (Part I Physics)
32
How does the distribution of winners rankings
evolve? (Part II Chemistry)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com