Presentation to Texas PUC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation to Texas PUC

Description:

Energy prices are free to reflect supply/demand ... Does 'Joe's Auto Shop' understand differing levels of interruptible service, or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: PAsh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation to Texas PUC


1
Presentation to Texas PUC
  • MARKET CONDITIONS, AND AN ICAP REQUIREMENT
  • - Dr. Daniel P. Maserang -

2
Energy-Only Market Conditions
  • A competitive, energy-only market should provide
    market signals to produce the appropriate
    generation, if
  • Obligation to Serve is terminated
  • Load chooses and pays for differing reliabilities
  • Load chooses and pays for differing price risks
  • ? Load is curtailed for economic reasons
  • ? Reliability may be less than once in ten years
  • Energy prices are free to reflect supply/demand
  • Long-term forward markets reflect desired
    reliability
  • Short-term forward and spot markets have scarcity
    rents
  • ? Prices higher than marginal unit
  • ? High spot prices for extended periods
  • Market information is available and understood by
    all

3
Energy-Only Market Realities
  • The current market conditions are quite
    different
  • Terminating Obligation to Serve
  • Many load segments may be politically unwilling
    or unable to terminate Obligation to Serve
    approach
  • Even if accepted on paper, real terminations
    will cause fallout
  • Retail consumers will generally not understand
    reliability
  • Real probabilities of curtailments
  • Long-term implications of not paying for
    reliability
  • Floating energy prices
  • Retail consumers rarely opt for more expensive
    longer-term contracts
  • WSCC/FERC has shown political ability and will to
    interfere in short-term and medium-term scarcity
    rents
  • So far, NEPOOL, NYSIO, PJM have been pushed by
    load interfere in fully floating prices
  • Generators/Financiers will expect ERCOT to do the
    same
  • Information/Understanding lacking at retail
    customer level

4
Information Issues
  • Complexity of energy markets at the retail level
  • Does Joes Auto Shop understand differing
    levels of interruptible service, or risks in
    real-time energy prices?
  • Low return (s/month) for big intellectual
    investment ? Big consumers get economies of
    scale, medium/small consumers may not
  • Retail Demand Pricing
  • Real time availability?
  • Long-term contracts at retail level?
  • Grade A reliability priced higher than Grade
    B??
  • Curtailing individual consumers, businesses
  • Feasible Logistically?
  • X suppliers with Y service levels at 24 or 48 or
    1440 periods/day?
  • Feasible Politically? Economically?

5
Wholesale Supply Issues
  • Price feedback is VERY short Supply response
    cycle is VERY long
  • Mismatch leads to unstable supply/demand
    equilibrium
  • 2 to 5 years to ensure supply when needed
  • Most load contracts shorter ? understated demand
  • Different than gasoline, natural gas, bananas,
    memory chips
  • Short-term elasticity in both supply and demand
  • These can be piped, trucked, shipped to region as
    storage and reserve stock get thin and prices
    escalate
  • No electricity storage reserves cannot be
    depleted and replaced
  • No economic force directly driving long-term
    reserve margins
  • Price only competition forces out anything not
    explicitly priced ? need reliability in retail
    contracts
  • Low margin, or Medium/small may not be able to
    justify paying for long-term reliability
  • Weather/Growth patterns might conceal impending
    problems in energy-only markets

6
Reserve Requirements/ICAP
  • Full conditions to drive reliability through
    energy-only markets is absent
  • Next best approach is a well designed Reserve
    Requirements obligation (e.g. ICAP, UCAP, etc.)
  • Punitive penalties (well above CT costs VOLL?)
    for failure to meet obligations
  • Traded market for reserve requirements
  • By definition, is always below penalty levels
  • If demand participates, will normally be very low
    relative to energy
  • At times might exceed CT
  • Long-term obligations
  • Annual requirement levels
  • Mechanisms for even longer-term obligations?

7
Review Questions
  • Is a reserve margin requirement or other
    mechanism necessary in order to ensure continued
    investment in new capacity?
  • Question is to ensure appropriate mix of
    generation online, new, existing, or market
    innovations
  • Feedback loop too long and price reaction too
    fast to maintain stable supply
  • No ICAP might make retirements permanent, not
    just mothballed
  • What can we learn from the installed capacity
    market (ICAP) experiences in New England, PJM,
    etc?
  • And California!
  • Load vs. Generation conflicts causing unstable
    market conditions ? non-optimal investment
  • Load not hedging when appropriate if not forced
  • Is there any evidence to show that ICAP results
    in the construction of new generation capacity?
  • Market players use traded value of
    ICAP/UCAP/Reserves in market evaluations
  • Dispatch Model type evaluations underestimate
    optimal mid-merit, and peaker
  • What is the impact of ICAP on customers?
  • Lower energy volatility, higher reliability,
    higher fixed costs
  • What should be the main objectives of an ICAP
    market in ERCOT?
  • Produce the economically desired level of energy
    volatility and reliability
  • What are the key principles to be followed in
    designing an ICAP market in ERCOT? ?
  • If Texas is going to have an ICAP market, what
    are the main ingredients of a successful market?
    ?
  • How can we measure success of an ICAP market in
    achieving our objectives? ?
  • Are there viable alternatives to ICAP that would
    encourage the construction of new capacity?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com