Will Ivancic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Will Ivancic

Description:

Auto configuration of addresses. Scoped Addressing (link, unique ... Securely integrating senor webs is a system-of-systems, network centric operations problem. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Robert1161
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Will Ivancic


1

Secure, Autonomous, Intelligent Controller for
Integrating Distributed Sensor Webs
  • Will Ivancic
  • NASA Glenn Research Center
  • william.d.ivancic_at_nasa.gov
  • http//roland.grc.nasa.gov/ivancic/papers_present
    ations/papers.html

2
Objectives
  • Develop architectures and protocols to enable
    time- critical interaction between space and
    ground systems
  • Secure, interoperation between sensor webs owned
    and controlled by various entities
  • Development of the network mobility technology
    including ad hoc network technology and reachback
    mechanisms to allow for rapid deployment of, and
    communication with remote mobile sensor webs.

3
Approach
  • Establish ground station infrastructure
  • Develop demonstrate protocols for Large File
    Transfer over Multiple Terminals
  • Develop Secure Integrated Sensor Web With Virtual
    Mission Operations Center (VMOC) Mission Rule Set
  • Develop, Integrate Testing Advanced Nemo
    Mobile Sensor Web Sensor

4
Benefits of Integrating Sensors
  • The ability to access sensor webs in
    particular, space-based sensors in a
    time-critical manner will enable new observation
    measurements and information products.
  • The ability to integrate sensor webs owned and
    controlled by various parties will reduce the
    risk, cost, size, and development time for Earth
    science space-based and ground-based information
    systems.
  • The ability to combine data from various sensor
    webs will result in new discoveries.

5
Collaborators and Partners
  • Universal Space Networks (USN)
  • General Dynamics,
  • Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (SSTL)
  • Cisco Systems
  • United States Geological Survey (USGS)
  • Air Force Space Battlelab
  • Army Space Missile Defense Battle Lab
  • University of Oklahoma
  • National Institute of Information and
    Communication Technology, Japan (NICT)
  • Japan Manned Space Systems, Inc. (JAMSS)
  • Hiroshima Institute of Technology (HIT)

6
Scenarios / Triggers
  • Seismic Monitoring / Buoys
  • Tsunami
  • Earth Quakes
  • USGS Water Gauges
  • Flooding
  • Weather Prediction
  • UAV/Satellite Integration
  • NASA Dryden UAV with Synthetic Aperture Radar

7
Examples of Sensor Webs
European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre
United States Steam Flow Gages
Sensor Buoys
8
Network Configuration
UK-DMC/CLEO
US Army Space Missile Defense Battle
Lab Colorado Springs
Experiments Workstation
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Hiroshima Institute of Technology Hiroshima, Japan
Multi-User Ground Station (MUGS) Colorado
Springs, CO
SSTL Guildford England
Segovia NOC
Open Internet
VMOC-1 (GRC)
Universal Space Networks Ground Network Alaska,
Hawaii and Australia
Home Agent (GRC)
VMOC
Database
9
ltlt- Time ltlt-
Large File Transfer Over Multiple Ground
Stations - The Problem -
Experiments Workstation
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Battlefield Operations (Vandenberg AFB)
2nd Ground Station
Segovia NOC
Desire is to buffer locally while in sight of the
satellite then redistribute to the VMOC
SSTL
Open Internet
Rate Mismatch Problem
VMOC-1
Home Agent (GRC)
VMOC-2 (GRC)
VMOC
Database
10
-gtgt Time -gtgt
Large File Transfer Over Multiple Ground
Stations - DTN is a Potential Solution -
Ground Station 2
Ground Station 1
Ground Station 3
Open Internet
VMOC
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Database
VMOC
Home Agent
11
Combining Mobile-IP and DTN for File Upload
-gtgt Time -gtgt
Ground Station 2
Ground Station 1
Ground Station 3
Open Internet
VMOC
Satellite Scheduler Controller
DTN Bundle Agent Source
Database
VMOC
Home Agent
12
Virtual Mission Operations Center (VMOC)
  • Enable system operators and data users to be
    remote
  • Verify individual users and their authorizations
  • Establish a secure user session with the platform
  • Perform user and command prioritization and
    contention control
  • Apply mission rules and perform command
    appropriateness tests
  • Relay data directly to the remote user without
    human intervention
  • Provide a knowledge data base and be designed to
    allow interaction with other, similar systems
  • Provide an encrypted gateway for
    unsophisticated user access (remote users of
    science data)

Note, Users can be machines!
13
Virtual Mission Operations Center
14
Delay/Disruption Tolerant Network (DTN) protocol
  • A standardized store and forward protocol and
    routing protocol
  • Designed for extreme environments
  • Large transmission link delays
  • Extended periods of network partitioning
  • Routing capable of operating efficiently in the
    following environments
  • Frequently-disconnected
  • Pre-scheduled
  • Opportunistic link availability
  • High per-link error rates making end-to-end
    reliability difficult
  • Heterogeneous underlying network technologies
    (including non-IP-based internets)
  • The architecture operates as an overlay network
  • Institutes a new naming architecture based on
    Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)

15
Large file transfer from DMC orbiter to multiple
ground stations
  • Collaboration with Surrey Space Technology Ltd.
    (SSTL).
  • Developed new, small DTN implementation in RTEMS,
    the real-time operating system of the orbiters
    solid state data recorder (SSDR).
  • SSTL's code and RTEMS development environment
    working.
  • Tested our build of SSTL's code on the PowerPC
    SSDR.
  • Using SSTLs file transfer protocol, Saratoga,
    as a DTN convergence sublayer convergence layer
    adapter wraps images into DTN bundles and writes
    them to files for transfer via Saratoga.
  • Implemented a DTN bundle checksum extension
    header that holds MD5 sums (or other checksums)
    to validate the payload.
  • Does not involve implementing the DTN security
    spec. This spec is impractical because it
    requires RSA as a mandatory algorithm for
    signatures, and no simple checksum component is
    specified.
  • Looking at extending Saratoga address space to
    allow for IPv6 Implementation
  • Possibility of standardizing SSTLs Saratoga
    within the IETF.

16
UK-DMC Implementation
Only Bundling and Forwarding Implemented
Full DTN Protocol Implemented
17
DTN Bundle Agent Discovery
  • Goal
  • Develop for two environments opportunistic (low
    delay), scheduled (very long delays)
  • Approach FY07
  • Contractor and NASA CS jointly working problem
  • Possibility of using OpNet or other simulation
    tools to determine scheduling
  • Investigate Discovery Techniques
  • Determine what information is useful to transfer
  • Bandwidth
  • Modulation and coding
  • Contact Time
  • Ephemeris data
  • Storage capacity

Bundle Agent discovery has many similarities to
Sensor Web discovery
18
Interoperability It is all about security and
policy!
Hiroshima Institute of Technology (Japan
Academia - .edu)
US Army Space Missile Defense (US Govt - .mil)
Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (UK Industry)
Universal Space Network - Alaska (US Industry -
.com)
Virtual Mission Operations Center (US Govt. -
.gov)
Universal Space Network - Hawaii (US Industry -
.com)
Mobile-IP NEMO Home Agent (US Govt. - .gov)
Universal Space Network - Australia (US Industry
- .com)
19
International Multi-organizational Network
Centric Operations Proposed Security Research
  • Intrusion Detection
  • Penetration Testing
  • Ground Rules
  • What Information will be shared regarding
    security implementations?
  • What degree of probing will be allowed?
  • What information will be shared regarding probing
    techniques?
  • What information will be shared regarding
    vulnerabilities found?
  • Leave Markers?
  • How and to whom will this information be
    reported?

20
International Interoperability
  • NASA claims of International Interoperability
  • For the most part it is at the data-link layer
    and modulation and coding (CCSDS)
  • Federal Express layer.
  • The space-link extension (SLE)
  • Not required for IP-based systems (at least the
    data-link extension portion of the SLE protocol)
  • Wraps data-link in IP therefore all security
    issues associated with tying IP networks together
    must be addressed
  • Mission Planning and Scheduling service must be
    implemented.
  • A framework for such exists as part of the
    mission services portion of SLE
  • Full interoperability means
  • Forward and return data is actually transmitted
    though systems owned and operated by various
    entities. (Note, this has an enormous security
    aspect to it.)
  • Ground stations
  • Network-layer space relays (satellite, rovers, or
    whatever infrastructure may be utilized as part
    of the communication network).
  • Requires autonomous routing mechanisms
  • Store and forward such as Delay/Disruption
    Tolerant Networking (DTN)
  • Requires securing data at rest

21
IPv6 Technology for Mobile Sensor Webs
  • Auto configuration of addresses
  • Scoped Addressing (link, unique local and global)
  • Large address space
  • Enables Globally unique addressing
  • Enables cryptographic addressing
  • Enables location management
  • Route Optimization for mobile-IP
  • Extensible header in IPv6 header format rather
    than options
  • Enhanced multicast capability
  • Scoped multicast
  • Routing protocols run on link-local multicast
  • Increased use of anycast addressing

22
Research Areas for IPv6-Based Mobile Sensor Webs
  • Autonomous identification of services such as
    domain name servers, network time servers,
    location managers and security servers
  • Identification of reachback paths to the big
    Internet
  • Route optimization of mobile networks
  • Security mechanism for mobile and ad hoc networks
    (other than radio link encryption) and,
  • Scalability of mobile sensor networks.

23
Self-Forming Communication Path
Mining / Cave/Canyon Exploration
Reach back to Internet Communication Path
24
System Operation True Interoperability
VMOC
NOC
NOC
NOC
25
Conclusions
  • Development of the secure sensor web network is
    will underway.
  • Securely integrating senor webs is a
    system-of-systems, network centric operations
    problem.
  • The ability to integrate infrastructure and
    sensor webs owned and controlled by various
    parties provides the following benefits
  • Reduce the risk, cost, size, and development time
    for Earth science space-based and ground-based
    information systems.
  • Increased science through collaborative sensor
    webs
  • New discoveries by combine data from various
    sensor webs (data mining)
  • The network required to perform secure,
    autonomous, intelligent control of integrating
    distributed sensor webs provides and excellent
    opportunity to perform international
    multi-organizational network centric operations
    proposed security research.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com