Title: Will Ivancic
1 Secure, Autonomous, Intelligent Controller for
Integrating Distributed Sensor Webs
- Will Ivancic
- NASA Glenn Research Center
- william.d.ivancic_at_nasa.gov
- http//roland.grc.nasa.gov/ivancic/papers_present
ations/papers.html
2Objectives
- Develop architectures and protocols to enable
time- critical interaction between space and
ground systems - Secure, interoperation between sensor webs owned
and controlled by various entities - Development of the network mobility technology
including ad hoc network technology and reachback
mechanisms to allow for rapid deployment of, and
communication with remote mobile sensor webs.
3Approach
- Establish ground station infrastructure
- Develop demonstrate protocols for Large File
Transfer over Multiple Terminals - Develop Secure Integrated Sensor Web With Virtual
Mission Operations Center (VMOC) Mission Rule Set
- Develop, Integrate Testing Advanced Nemo
Mobile Sensor Web Sensor
4Benefits of Integrating Sensors
- The ability to access sensor webs in
particular, space-based sensors in a
time-critical manner will enable new observation
measurements and information products. - The ability to integrate sensor webs owned and
controlled by various parties will reduce the
risk, cost, size, and development time for Earth
science space-based and ground-based information
systems. - The ability to combine data from various sensor
webs will result in new discoveries.
5Collaborators and Partners
- Universal Space Networks (USN)
- General Dynamics,
- Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (SSTL)
- Cisco Systems
- United States Geological Survey (USGS)
- Air Force Space Battlelab
- Army Space Missile Defense Battle Lab
- University of Oklahoma
- National Institute of Information and
Communication Technology, Japan (NICT) - Japan Manned Space Systems, Inc. (JAMSS)
- Hiroshima Institute of Technology (HIT)
6Scenarios / Triggers
- Seismic Monitoring / Buoys
- Tsunami
- Earth Quakes
- USGS Water Gauges
- Flooding
- Weather Prediction
- UAV/Satellite Integration
- NASA Dryden UAV with Synthetic Aperture Radar
7Examples of Sensor Webs
European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre
United States Steam Flow Gages
Sensor Buoys
8Network Configuration
UK-DMC/CLEO
US Army Space Missile Defense Battle
Lab Colorado Springs
Experiments Workstation
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Hiroshima Institute of Technology Hiroshima, Japan
Multi-User Ground Station (MUGS) Colorado
Springs, CO
SSTL Guildford England
Segovia NOC
Open Internet
VMOC-1 (GRC)
Universal Space Networks Ground Network Alaska,
Hawaii and Australia
Home Agent (GRC)
VMOC
Database
9ltlt- Time ltlt-
Large File Transfer Over Multiple Ground
Stations - The Problem -
Experiments Workstation
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Battlefield Operations (Vandenberg AFB)
2nd Ground Station
Segovia NOC
Desire is to buffer locally while in sight of the
satellite then redistribute to the VMOC
SSTL
Open Internet
Rate Mismatch Problem
VMOC-1
Home Agent (GRC)
VMOC-2 (GRC)
VMOC
Database
10-gtgt Time -gtgt
Large File Transfer Over Multiple Ground
Stations - DTN is a Potential Solution -
Ground Station 2
Ground Station 1
Ground Station 3
Open Internet
VMOC
Satellite Scheduler Controller
Database
VMOC
Home Agent
11Combining Mobile-IP and DTN for File Upload
-gtgt Time -gtgt
Ground Station 2
Ground Station 1
Ground Station 3
Open Internet
VMOC
Satellite Scheduler Controller
DTN Bundle Agent Source
Database
VMOC
Home Agent
12Virtual Mission Operations Center (VMOC)
- Enable system operators and data users to be
remote - Verify individual users and their authorizations
- Establish a secure user session with the platform
- Perform user and command prioritization and
contention control - Apply mission rules and perform command
appropriateness tests - Relay data directly to the remote user without
human intervention - Provide a knowledge data base and be designed to
allow interaction with other, similar systems - Provide an encrypted gateway for
unsophisticated user access (remote users of
science data)
Note, Users can be machines!
13Virtual Mission Operations Center
14Delay/Disruption Tolerant Network (DTN) protocol
- A standardized store and forward protocol and
routing protocol - Designed for extreme environments
- Large transmission link delays
- Extended periods of network partitioning
- Routing capable of operating efficiently in the
following environments - Frequently-disconnected
- Pre-scheduled
- Opportunistic link availability
- High per-link error rates making end-to-end
reliability difficult - Heterogeneous underlying network technologies
(including non-IP-based internets) - The architecture operates as an overlay network
- Institutes a new naming architecture based on
Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
15Large file transfer from DMC orbiter to multiple
ground stations
- Collaboration with Surrey Space Technology Ltd.
(SSTL). - Developed new, small DTN implementation in RTEMS,
the real-time operating system of the orbiters
solid state data recorder (SSDR). - SSTL's code and RTEMS development environment
working. - Tested our build of SSTL's code on the PowerPC
SSDR. - Using SSTLs file transfer protocol, Saratoga,
as a DTN convergence sublayer convergence layer
adapter wraps images into DTN bundles and writes
them to files for transfer via Saratoga. - Implemented a DTN bundle checksum extension
header that holds MD5 sums (or other checksums)
to validate the payload. - Does not involve implementing the DTN security
spec. This spec is impractical because it
requires RSA as a mandatory algorithm for
signatures, and no simple checksum component is
specified. - Looking at extending Saratoga address space to
allow for IPv6 Implementation - Possibility of standardizing SSTLs Saratoga
within the IETF.
16UK-DMC Implementation
Only Bundling and Forwarding Implemented
Full DTN Protocol Implemented
17DTN Bundle Agent Discovery
- Goal
- Develop for two environments opportunistic (low
delay), scheduled (very long delays) - Approach FY07
- Contractor and NASA CS jointly working problem
- Possibility of using OpNet or other simulation
tools to determine scheduling - Investigate Discovery Techniques
- Determine what information is useful to transfer
- Bandwidth
- Modulation and coding
- Contact Time
- Ephemeris data
- Storage capacity
Bundle Agent discovery has many similarities to
Sensor Web discovery
18Interoperability It is all about security and
policy!
Hiroshima Institute of Technology (Japan
Academia - .edu)
US Army Space Missile Defense (US Govt - .mil)
Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (UK Industry)
Universal Space Network - Alaska (US Industry -
.com)
Virtual Mission Operations Center (US Govt. -
.gov)
Universal Space Network - Hawaii (US Industry -
.com)
Mobile-IP NEMO Home Agent (US Govt. - .gov)
Universal Space Network - Australia (US Industry
- .com)
19International Multi-organizational Network
Centric Operations Proposed Security Research
- Intrusion Detection
- Penetration Testing
- Ground Rules
- What Information will be shared regarding
security implementations? - What degree of probing will be allowed?
- What information will be shared regarding probing
techniques? - What information will be shared regarding
vulnerabilities found? - Leave Markers?
- How and to whom will this information be
reported?
20International Interoperability
- NASA claims of International Interoperability
- For the most part it is at the data-link layer
and modulation and coding (CCSDS) - Federal Express layer.
- The space-link extension (SLE)
- Not required for IP-based systems (at least the
data-link extension portion of the SLE protocol) - Wraps data-link in IP therefore all security
issues associated with tying IP networks together
must be addressed - Mission Planning and Scheduling service must be
implemented. - A framework for such exists as part of the
mission services portion of SLE - Full interoperability means
- Forward and return data is actually transmitted
though systems owned and operated by various
entities. (Note, this has an enormous security
aspect to it.) - Ground stations
- Network-layer space relays (satellite, rovers, or
whatever infrastructure may be utilized as part
of the communication network). - Requires autonomous routing mechanisms
- Store and forward such as Delay/Disruption
Tolerant Networking (DTN) - Requires securing data at rest
21IPv6 Technology for Mobile Sensor Webs
- Auto configuration of addresses
- Scoped Addressing (link, unique local and global)
- Large address space
- Enables Globally unique addressing
- Enables cryptographic addressing
- Enables location management
- Route Optimization for mobile-IP
- Extensible header in IPv6 header format rather
than options - Enhanced multicast capability
- Scoped multicast
- Routing protocols run on link-local multicast
- Increased use of anycast addressing
22Research Areas for IPv6-Based Mobile Sensor Webs
- Autonomous identification of services such as
domain name servers, network time servers,
location managers and security servers - Identification of reachback paths to the big
Internet - Route optimization of mobile networks
- Security mechanism for mobile and ad hoc networks
(other than radio link encryption) and, - Scalability of mobile sensor networks.
23Self-Forming Communication Path
Mining / Cave/Canyon Exploration
Reach back to Internet Communication Path
24System Operation True Interoperability
VMOC
NOC
NOC
NOC
25Conclusions
- Development of the secure sensor web network is
will underway. - Securely integrating senor webs is a
system-of-systems, network centric operations
problem. - The ability to integrate infrastructure and
sensor webs owned and controlled by various
parties provides the following benefits - Reduce the risk, cost, size, and development time
for Earth science space-based and ground-based
information systems. - Increased science through collaborative sensor
webs - New discoveries by combine data from various
sensor webs (data mining) - The network required to perform secure,
autonomous, intelligent control of integrating
distributed sensor webs provides and excellent
opportunity to perform international
multi-organizational network centric operations
proposed security research.