Napa County: A Sliver Lining in A Regional Storm IMPACT Napa North Bay Business Journal Conference A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Napa County: A Sliver Lining in A Regional Storm IMPACT Napa North Bay Business Journal Conference A

Description:

Chair, Economics Department. Director, Center for Regional Economic Analysis ... CAR estimating an inverse relationship between median home price and foreclosures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: son1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Napa County: A Sliver Lining in A Regional Storm IMPACT Napa North Bay Business Journal Conference A


1
Napa CountyA Sliver Lining in A Regional
Storm?IMPACT NapaNorth Bay Business Journal
ConferenceAugust 26, 2008
  • Robert Eyler, Ph.D.
  • Chair, Economics Department
  • Director, Center for Regional Economic Analysis
  • Sonoma State University
  • eyler_at_sonoma.edu

2
Introduction
  • Napa County is a microcosm of the North Bay
    economy
  • Wineries and tourism important to Napa County
  • Relatively affordable housing versus other North
    Bay options
  • Centrally located for all compass points
  • Mix of ethnic, age and skills makes Napa a place
    of growth
  • The current economic climate
  • For Napa County, the data are relatively good.
  • Recessionary forces buffered somewhat in Napa
  • Still suffering as are most other municipalities

3
Introduction (cont.)
  • Napa exposed to some long-term risks
  • Especially in terms of wage demands given
    inflation pressure on working poor
  • Gas prices rising simply a sign of this frailty
  • Cost of living relatively high vs. CA
  • CAR estimating an inverse relationship between
    median home price and foreclosures
  • This characteristic not going away anytime soon
  • Where will growth be located?
  • Is it wanted?
  • Must also consider regional competition

4
Introduction (cont.)
  • Unemployment rising at a slower pace versus other
    NB counties
  • Exposure to bankruptcies and foreclosures as a
    result
  • American Canyon the focus of much of this
    activity
  • Dichotomy between northern and southern Napa more
    obvious now.
  • Is this relationship a good one?
  • Economic Development
  • Needs partnerships between private and public
    sector to succeed
  • Does a common vision of Napa exist?

5
Source CA EDD
6
The Macroeconomic Situation (Quickly)
  • Not much to add to media bombardment
  • Three things to consider
  • Election has exacerbated uncertainty
  • American consumers still convinced presidents
    have economic power beyond military
  • Will taxes rise?
  • We spent ourselves into this situation, need to
    save our way out
  • Real estate is a savings, not a spending, vehicle
  • Inflation pressure will continue
  • Housing bubble simply worsened this pressure and
    sped it up
  • Dont consider any slide in oil/gas prices a
    long-term trend

7
Housing Market
  • Napa, as of June 2008, has 6th highest median
    home price in CA among counties
  • Napa 440K, Sonoma 385K
  • City of Napa, 429K
  • Approximately 20 lower than last year in June
  • Foreclosures may be inversely related to median
    home prices (CAR)
  • American Canyon vs. St. Helena a good test of
    this.
  • All counties exposed to problems

8
Napas Economic Mix
  • Diverse industry mix
  • Napa is not all wineries, hotels and restaurants
  • Much of its strength comes from these
  • Construction still strong in Napa
  • Services wide in breadth and available throughout
    county
  • Location
  • Central location allows residents to commute
    relatively easily to other counties for work
  • Napa mainly an export economy

9
Source CA EDD
10
Source CA EDD
11
Source CA EDD
12
Source CA EDD
13
Toby Tyler Leading Indicators
  • Weighted average of macroeconomic data for each
    county.
  • Leading Indicators tell us where we are headed
  • Default Notices Inverse
  • Building Permits Positive
  • New UI Claims Inverse
  • US Leading Index Positive
  • Help-Wanted Ads Positive
  • Ag Price Index Positive
  • Inverse means as indicator rises, economy slows.

14
Toby Tyler Coincident Indicators
  • Coincident Indicators tell us where we are
  • Non-agricultural employment
  • Retail Sales
  • Personal Income
  • Once business and consumers receive positive
    signals, they hire and spend more as a reaction.
  • The leading and coincident together trace the
    business cycle
  • Overall an unstable year
  • Napa relatively more stable than others

15
Comparison of Leading Indicators
16
Comparison of Coincident Indicators
17
Wine and Manufacturing
  • Manufacturing jobs have actually increased in
    Napa since 1990
  • Wages in manufacturing increased through this
    decade
  • About 17.5 of Napa labor in manufacturing
    (wineries)
  • Construction jobs similar in wage and multiplier
    effects
  • A puzzle exists
  • Should high-tech manufacturing be pursued by
    Napa, versus Solano or Sonoma counties?
  • Is there room?
  • Is it wanted?

18
Wine and Tourism
  • The current upswing in these industries dependent
    on three key items
  • Changing tastes toward wine, where Napa has a
    niche
  • Americans are traveling closer to home due to
    both gas prices and dollars value and
  • Foreign economies not in recessionyet
  • Europe and Asia beginning to show signs of
    weakness
  • Are Napa firms tracking where customers
    originate?
  • Should they?

19
The Education Puzzle
  • NB wages, both average and median, lag behind
    state averages
  • Napa median 85.1
  • Sonoma median 86.2
  • The puzzle educational attainment of residents
    greater than CA on average
  • Marin, Napa and Sonoma all have more BA or
    greater degree holders on average than CA
  • Does non-working wealth explain the difference?

20
(No Transcript)
21
Napa Challenges
  • Causality problem in labor mitigated by
    public/private partnerships
  • Businesses signal to education their needs
  • Education delivers, businesses come, closes loop
  • Living wage to be or not to be
  • May create more problems than it solves
  • Pressure to develop in certain ways must match
    community vision
  • Is there a community vision for Napa?
  • Regional competition

22
Challenges (cont.)
  • Dichotomy between northern and southern Napa
    County a problem(?)
  • Most tourists to northern Napa must drive through
    southern Napa to get there
  • Should the City of Napa simply serve as a
    residential center for the rest of the County and
    other counties?
  • Can southern Napa larger advantage of this?

23
Conclusions
  • Napa likely the best of the North Bay counties
    during this downturn
  • Wineries growing and sales rising
  • Countercyclical growth due to numerous factors
  • Tourism industry to expand
  • Napa an export economy
  • Exposure to risks and challenges are real
  • Must watch other counties
  • Competition likely to rise and continue
  • Can and should Napa attract other industries?
  • Can growth take place for Napa and work?

24
www.sonoma.edu/org/crea/impactnapa1.ppt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com