EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATION Istanbul 21062007 JeanPierre HANNEQUART - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATION Istanbul 21062007 JeanPierre HANNEQUART

Description:

EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATION Istanbul 21062007 JeanPierre HANNEQUART – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: sophiedem
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATION Istanbul 21062007 JeanPierre HANNEQUART


1
EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONIstanbul
21/06/2007 Jean-Pierre HANNEQUART
2
ACR ?
A.EUROPEAN POLICY STEPS B.LEGAL SYNTHESIS
3
ACR an international network of Waste
Management Actors
More than 80 members 22 countries
4
Association of Cities Regions for Recycling
Sustainable Management of Resources
67 LRAs Aalborg (DK), Agence de lEnergie et de
lEnvironnement en Poitou-Charentes (APCEDE F),
Amalga (P) Ancona (Provincia di - I), Andalucia
(E), Antwerpen (B), Barcelona (Ayuntamiento - E),
Barcelona (Area Metropolitana - E), Basel (CH),
Brussels (ABP-B), Brussels (Region-B), Catalunya
(E), Charentes (F), Charleroi (ICDI) (B),
Chiclana de la Frontera (E), Doncaster (UK),
Dublin (Irl), South Dublin County Council (Irl),
Dunkerque (F), Fingal County Council (Irl),
Gipuzkoa (E), Hasselt (B), Hampshire (UK),
Helsingborg (S), IDELUX (B), INTRADEL (B),
IPALLE(B), Kairouan (TN), La Coruna (E),
Lausanne (CH), Leiria (Valorlis, P), Liège (B),
Lille (F), Lisbon (P), London (UK),
Lons-le-Saunier (F), Luxembourg (GDL), Lyon (F),
Mahdia (T),Madrid (E), Malaga (E), Mallorca (E),
Marche (Regione I), Marseille (F), Milton
Keynes (GB), Nantes (F), Nicosia (Chypre), Odense
(DK), Oeiras (P), Oporto (Lipor) (P), OVAM (B),
Pamplona (E), Paris (F), Perugia (I), Rabat-Salé
(M), Regio Emilia (Provincia di - I), San Boit de
Llobregat (E), Settimo Torinese (I), Sousse (TN),
Torino (AMIAT AMIAT TBD, I), Département de
Vendée (F), Vienna (A), Wallonia (B), Warszawa
(PL), Zagreb (Cr) 5 Networks AMORCE (F), Cercle
National du Recyclage (F), Club Español de los
Residuos (E), AICA (I), AECR (S), 3 Private
companiesSUEZ Environnement, ENVAC, SHANKS 8
NGOs Academics Ecological Recycling Society
(Gr), ERICA (I), Espace Environnement (B),
Federambiente (I) Fundacion Traperos de Emaus
(E), Green Steps for Environmental Literacy
(TR) RAL Assurance Quality (D), Swansea Institute
(UK)
5
Association of Cities Regions for Recycling
Cities
Regions
Provinces
NGOs
EXCHANGE of information and experience
Academics, companies
European Commission
Regulatory and voluntary instruments
Statistics techniques
Financial mechanisms
Communication
6
  • Packaging
  • Organics
  • Electrical
  • Bulky
  • Hazardous
  • Eco-consumption
  • Waste prevention
  • Selective collection
  • Recycling
  • Recovery

EXCHANGE partnership
7
Association of Cities Regions for Recycling
Exchange partnership
8
A concept of 100 kg
less per inhabitant per year
9
RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING PERFORMANCES?
  • EUROPEAN WASTE BIN (500 KG)
  • ORGANICS (35) 175 KG
  • DRY RECYCLABLES (50) 250 KG
  • OTHERS 75 KG
  • Selective collection performances
  • 120- 200 kg/person/yr of dry recyclables
  • Paper 70-100 kg/person
  • Glass 25-35 kg/person
  • Light fraction packaging 20-35 kg/person
  • 100-200 kg/person/yr of bio-waste
  • 50-150 kg/person/yr of other recyclables

Textiles 3-5 kg/person WEEE 4-8 kg/person
  • EUROPEAN POTENTIAL RECYCLING TARGET
  • COMPOSTING 125 KG (25)
  • RECYCLING SS 200 KG (40)
  • ____________
  • (65)

10
EUROPEAN POLICY STEPS
  • Waste Strategy (1989)(1997)
  • Integrated Product Policy (2001) (2003)
  • 6th Environmental Action Programme (2002)
  • Ressources Thematic Strategy (2005)
  • Prevention and Recycling thematic strategies
    (2005)

11
1. EUROPEAN WASTE STATEGY (1989)(1997)
  • Hierarchy 1. Prevention
  • 2. (optional) Reuse
  • 3. (implicit) Material Recycling
  • 4. Recovery
  • 5. Disposal
  • Proximity (for disposal) /
  • Free circulation (for recovery)(inside EU)

12
2. EUROPEAN INTEGRATED PRODUCT POLICY (2003)
  • ( all product life-cycles all the stakeholders
    all the political instruments)
  • gt2004-2006 pilot product exercise (mobile
    phones/ tropical wooden garden chairs)
  • gt 2005-2006 identification of products with the
    greatest potential for environmental improvement
    (food and drink, private transport,housing)
  • Working groups ( reporting formats /
    environmental product information/ LCA )
  • IPP toolbox
  • Green paper (2001)
  • Integration of environmental costs
  • into the price of products
  • Support of eco-design
  • Promotion of eco-consumption

13
3a. 6TH ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMME
(2002-2012)
  • WASTE AND RECOVERY OBJECTIVES
  • - Decoupling waste and economic growth (2010
    22 of electricity from renewables)
  • at source
  • - Waste reduction
  • landfill

14
3b. 6TH ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMME
(2002-2012)
  • NEW LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVE

(waste/product) (disposal/recovery)
- packaging
- batteries
- sludges
- biodegradable wastes
- construction waste
15
3c. 6TH ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMME
(2002-2012)
  • THEMATIC STRATEGIES PERSPECTIVE
  • Minimum requirements (means in relation to
    objective regular evaluation consultation /
    co-decision)
  • Potential contents (quantitative and qualitative
    targets timetables multi-instrumental
    approaches)

16
3d. 6TH ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMME
(2002-2012)
  • THEMATIC STRATEGIES PERSPECTIVE ABOUT
  • 1- air quality
  • 2- soil protection
  • 3- pesticides
  • 4- marine environment
  • 5- waste recycling
  • 6- sustainable use of natural resources
  • 7- urban environment

17
4. THEMATIC STRATEGY RESOURCES (2005)
  • Disconnect environmental damage from economic
    growth (2008 guidelines)
  • Scientific Centrum
  • High level forum
  • Panel (with UNEP) on global impact
  • Problems are more environmental impact than
    possible scarcity
  • Disconnection strategy needs20 years
  • knowledge gathering
  • policy assessment

18
5a THEMATIC STRATEGY WASTE RECYCLING(2005)
  • EUROPEAN RECYCLING SOCIETY final aim
  • - BETTER REGULATION
  • - LIFE-CYCLE THINKING
  • - COMMON STANDARDS
  • - STUDY ON (EUROPEAN) MATERIAL
    OBJECTIVE
  • - EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT
    NATIONAL DISPOSAL TAXES
  • NEW INCENTIVE MEASURES
  • Common criteria for landfill taxes?
  • Tradeable certificates ?
  • More producer responsibility ?
  • Promotion of pay-as-you-throw schemes?
  • Landfill bans or obligatory separation at source?
  • NEW RECYCLING TARGETS
  • Material-orientated targets (papers, plastics)?
  • Indicative recycling targets (cdw, msw)?

19
5b THEMATIC STRATEGYWASTE PREVENTION(2005)
  • NATIONAL PREVENTION PROGRAMS OR PLANS
  • WASTE PREVENTION INTEGRATION IN BREFS and PERMITS
  • prevention targets?
  • restrictions for particular substances?
  • voluntary or mandatory waste prevention plans?
  • information exchange on consumers behaviour?

20
B. LEGAL ACTS
21
BETTER REGULATION FOR WASTE
  • COM (2003)71
  • - to revise the juridical key-definitions
  • - to look for non-regulatory options
  • - to introduce "life-cycle thinking"
  • - to adopt a new framework-directive
  • - to revise all existing juridical acts

22
LEGAL PRINCIPLES

Prevention/Precaution Polluter - Pays High Level
of Protection
Integration Subsidiarity
Proximity Self-Sufficiency
Hierarchy Co-responsibility
23
PREVENTION PRINCIPLE
  • Qualitative and quantitative measures
  • Clean products and technologies
  • (Directive 91/156)
  • Packaging national programs /
  • essential requirements (Directive 94/62)
  • Waste reduction at source

24
PREVENTION PROGRAMMES?
NATIONAL WASTE PREVENTION PROGRAMMES
??
??
Resources
Waste
Products
Recycling
DEMATERIALISATION
ECO-CONSUMPTION
25
PRECAUTION PRINCIPLE
  • ----
  • Hazardous waste restriction
  • No dumping at sea

26
"POLLUTER PAYS" PRINCIPLE
  • All actors implication
  • Banning of financial aid
  • Civil liability (without fault)
  • Channelling of financial obligation

27
5. Landfill taxes in EU 15 (in /ton 2006)
28
HIGH-LEVEL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
  • NO to the lowest common denominator
  • Liberty to take more restrictive environmental
    measures
  • Restriction to some waste movement

29
SUBSIDIARY PRINCIPLE
  • ? EUROPEAN ACTION IF
  • Transboundary pollutions
  • National disparities with
  • distorsions of competition
  • barriers to internal market
  • undesirable movement of investment
  • Global saving

30
INTEGRATION PRINCIPLE
  • EUROPEAN FORUM on the COMPETITIVENESS of the
    RECYCLING INDUSTRY
  • INTEGRATED PRODUCT POLICY

31
HIERARCHY PRINCIPLE
  • PREVENTION
  • Suppression
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Reduction
  • - REUSE
  • RECOVERY
  • - MATERIAL RECOVERY
  • Internal
  • External
  • Recycling
  • Sub-cyling
  • (Composting, feedstock)
  • - ENERGY RECOVERY
  • Hight
  • Low
  • DISPOSAL

32
CO-RESPONSABILITY PRINCIPLE
  • WASTE MANAGEMENT COSTS INTEGRATION INTO THE COSTS
    OF
  • - packaging
  • - used cars
  • - electric and electronic equipement
  • -
  • PHYSICAL AND / OR ORGANISATIONAL TASK

33
PRODUCERS RESPONSABILITY - A Diversity of
Approaches
34
PROXIMITY AND SELF-SUFFICIENCY
  • "Must be disposed of as soon as possible to their
    place of production"
  • EU must treat all the waste produced on its
    territory
  • MS shall aim the same but taking onto account
  • geographical conditions
  • the need of specialized plants
  • the need of an integrated network of waste
    management
  • some small quantities of hazardous waste

35
Conclusion
Ideas Studies Actions
Judicial Economic Educational

Waste Products Resources
36
Rethink Redesign
ReuseRepair
Reduce

Waste
Resources
Product
Reuse Repair Recycle Recover
37
For any other information Jean-Pierre
HANNEQUARTjph_at_ibgebim.be

ACR Association of Cities and Regions for
recycling and sustainable resource
management Gulledelle 100 1200 Bruxelles 32/ 2
775 77 01
Gulledelle 100 1200 Bruxelles 32/ 2 775 75 11

www.acrplus.org
www.ibgebim.be
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com