Instructional Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Instructional Technology

Description:

According to Driscoll (2000), learning theory 'comprises of a set of ... Retrieved September 13, 2005, from http://copland.udel.edu/~jconway/EDST666.htm#dislrn ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: andreat2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Instructional Technology


1
Instructional Technology
  • Foundation, Framework Philosophy

2
Contents
  • Psychological Foundations
  • Learning Environments
  • Learner Motivation
  • Philosophical Beliefs

3
Psychological Foundations
  • What is Learning Theory?
  • According to Driscoll (2000), learning theory
    comprises of a set of constructs linking
    observed changes in performance with what is
    thought to bring about those changes (p. 11)
  • Example of a construct Memory

Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning
for instruction (2nd ed). Needham Heights, MA
Allyn and Bacon.
4
Learning Theories
  • COGNITION
  • COGNITIVE APPRENTISHIP
  • GAGNES THEORY OF INSTRUCTION
  • CONSTRUCTIVISM

5
Cognition
  • Cognition is the study of mind and intelligence,
    embracing philosophy, psychology, artificial
    intelligence, neuroscience, linguistics, and
    anthropology

Cognitive Science. (2005). Stanford encyclopedia
of philosophy. Retrieved September 12, 2005,
from http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-
science/
6
Cognition Theorists
  • Jerome Bruner
  • Howard Gardner
  • Jean Piaget
  • Lev Vygotsky

7
Jerome Bruner
  • Learning is an active process in which students
    construct new ideas or concepts based on their
    current knowledge

Jerome Bruner. (2005). The PSI Café. Retrieved
September 12, 2005, from http//www.psy.pdx.edu/P
siCafe/KeyTheorists/Bruner.htm
8
Howard Gardner
  • Theory of Multiple Intelligence
  • Howard Gardner proposes that there is not a
    single Intelligence," but rather that there are
    seven
  • Visual / Spatial Intelligence
  • Musical Intelligence
  • Verbal Intelligence
  • Logical/Mathematical Intelligence
  • Interpersonal Intelligence
  • Intrapersonal Intelligence
  • Bodily / Kinesthetic Intelligence

Howard Gardners Multiple Intelligence Theory.
(2005). Retrieved September 13, 2005, from Penn
State University website http//www.ed.psu.edu/i
nsys/ESD/gardner/MItheory.html
9
Jean Piaget
  • Theorized that cognitive development proceeds in
    four genetically determined stages that always
    follow the same sequential order.
  • Sensorimotor (birth to approx. 2 years)
  • Preoperational (2 to 7 years)
  • Concrete Operational (7 to 11 years)
  • Formal Operations (11 years onward)

Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning
for instruction (2nd ed). Needham Heights, MA
Allyn and Bacon.
10
Lev Vygotsky
  • Socio-cultural theory of learning emphasizes that
    human intelligence originates in our society or
    culture, and individual cognitive gain occurs
    first through interpersonal (interaction with
    social environment) than intrapersonal
    (internalization).

CSCL Theories. (2005). Retrieved September 12,
2005, from http//www.edb.utexas.edu/csclstudent/
Dhsiao/theories.htmlvygot
11
COGNITIVE APPRENTISHIP
  • Permits peers to learn through their
    interactions, to build stories about common
    experiences, and to share the knowledge building
    experiences with the group
  • core characteristics
  • heuristic content
  • situated learning
  • Modeling
  • Coaching
  • Articulation
  • Reflection
  • exploration

Wilson, B., Cole, P. (1994). An
instructional-design review of cognitive teaching
models. Paper presented at the meeting of the
American Educational ResearchAssociation,
Chicago, IL.
12
GAGNES THEORY OF INSTRUCTION
  • Conditions of Learning
  • Effective instruction should reach beyond
    traditional learning theories. 
  • Cumulative teaching transitions from simple to
    complex skills within a hierarchical framework. 

Robert Gagne. (2005). Encyclopedia of educational
technology. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
http//coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/gagnesevents/inde
x.htm
13
Gagnes Nine Events of Instruction
  • gaining attention (reception)
  • informing learners of the objective (expectancy)
  • stimulating recall of prior learning (retrieval)
  • presenting the stimulus (selective perception)
  • providing learning guidance (semantic encoding)
  • eliciting performance (responding)
  • providing feedback (reinforcement)
  • assessing performance (retrieval)
  • enhancing retention and transfer (generalization)

Robert Gagne. (2005). Encyclopedia of educational
technology. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
http//coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/gagnesevents/inde
x.htm
14
CONSTRUCTIVISM
  • A teaching and learning approach that encourages
    and allows students to build on prior knowledge
    while challenging their misconceptions through
    experience.
  • Constructivist approach to learning emphasizes
    authentic, challenging projects that include
    students, teachers and experts in the learning
    community.
  • Student-centered learning environment

Constructivism. (2005). Retrieved September 13,
2005, from The University of Massachusetts at
Amherst website http//www-unix.oit.umass.edu/
afeldman/defcon.html
15
Learning Environments
  • Constructivist Theory
  • Schema Theory
  • Social Learning Theory
  • Discovery Learning

16
Constructivist Theory
  • A learning environment designed to promote
    individual construction of knowledge
  • Knowledge-building tools are provided
  • Learners are active and control their own
    learning process
  • Learners create artifacts that reflect their
    learning
  • Artifacts are shared and reflected on to extend
    understanding
  • Learning is authentic

Reiser, R., Dempsey, J. (2002) Instructional
design and technology. Upper Saddle River, New
Jersey Prentice Hall
17
Schema Theory
  • All human beings possess categorical rules or
    scripts that they use to interpret the world. New
    information is processed according to how it fits
    into these rules, called schema. These schema can
    be used not only to interpret but also to predict
    situation occurring in our environment.
  • The learner in schema theory actively builds
    schema and revises them in light on new
    information

Widmayer , S. (2005). Schema theory An
introduction. Retrieved September 13, 2005,
from http//chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgeba
se/strategies/cognitivism/SchemaTheory.htm
18
Schema New Information
  • There are three different reactions that a
    learner can have to new information
  • Accretation is when learners take the new input
    and assimilate it into their existing schema
    without making any changes to the overall schema.
  • Tuning is when learners realize that their
    existing schema is inadequate for the new
    knowledge and modify their existing schema
    accordingly.
  • Restructuring is the process of creating a new
    schema addressing the inconsistencies between the
    old schema and the newly acquired information.

Meaningful Reception Learning Schema Theory.
(2005). Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
Indiana University website http//education.indi
ana.edu/p540/webcourse/schema.htmltop/
19
Social Learning Theory
  • Behavior is often modeled after things that have
    been experienced by the individual
  • The social learning theory is the behavior theory
    most relevant to criminology.

Isom, M. (1998). Retrieved September 13, 2005,
from FSU College of Criminology and Criminal
Justice website http//www.criminology.fsu.edu/c
rimtheory/bandura.htm
20
Albert Bandura
  • He believed aggression reinforced by family
    members was the most prominent source of behavior
    modeling
  • He believed that individuals, especially
    children, learn aggressive responses from
    observing others, either personally or through
    the media or environment
  • Developed steps for successful Modeling

Isom, M. (1998). Retrieved September 13, 2005,
from FSU College of Criminology and Criminal
Justice website http//www.criminology.fsu.edu/c
rimtheory/bandura.htm
21
Modeling Process
  • Attention - If you are going to learn anything,
    you have to be paying attention.
  • Retention - You must be able to retain --
    remember -- what you have paid attention to.
  • Reproduction  - You have to translate the images
    or descriptions into actual behavior.
  • Motivation - You must have some reason for doing
    it

Boree, G. (2005). Personality theories. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//www.ship.edu/cgb
oeree/bandura.html
22
Discovery Learning
  • Students interact with their environment by
    exploring and manipulating objects, wrestling
    with questions and controversies, or performing
    experiments.
  • Students are more likely to remember concepts
    they discover on their own.

Conway, J. (1997). Educational technology's
effect on models of instruction. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//copland.udel.edu/
jconway/EDST666.htmdislrn
23
Learner Motivation
  • A persons desire to pursue a goal or perform a
    task, which is manifested by choice of goals and
    effort in pursuing the goal.

Reiser, R., Dempsey, J. (2002) Instructional
design and technology. Upper Saddle River, New
Jersey Prentice Hall.
24
Kellers ARCS
  • Used to explain phenomena associated with student
    motivation
  • Explains what people will do rather then what
    they can do

Keller, J. M., (1983). Development and use of the
ARCS model of motivational design. Enschede,
Netherlands Twente Univ. of Technology. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 001) 
25
Factors that Influence Teaching and Learning
  • Attention Refers to weather a students
    interest is gained and maintained during
    instruction.
  • Relevance Whether a student perceives
    instruction as fulfilling as personal need.
  • Confidence Whether a student expects to fail or
    succeed at a certain task.
  • Satisfaction Rewards students receive from
    instructional or educational activity.

Barba, R. (1998). Kellers ARCS models. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//www2.sjsu.edu/dep
ts/it/edit186/karcs/sld003.html
26
Motivational Strategies - Attention
  • Perceptual Arousal provide novelty, surprise,
    incongruity or uncertainty.
  • Inquiry Arousal stimulate curiosity by posing
    questions or problems to solve.
  • Variability incorporate a range of methods and
    media to meet students' varying needs.

Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in instructional
design. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
http//www.ericdigests.org/1998-1/motivation.htm
27
Motivational Strategies - Relevance
  • Goal Orientation present the objectives and
    useful purpose of the instruction and specific
    methods for successful achievement.
  • Motive Matching match objectives to student
    needs and motives.
  • Familiarity present content in ways that are
    understandable and that are related to the
    learners' experience and values.

Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in instructional
design. ERIC Digest. ED 407 930. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//www.ericdigests.or
g/1998-1/ motivation.htm
28
Motivational Strategies - Confidence
  • Learning Requirements inform students about
    learning and performance requirements and
    assessment criteria.
  • Success Opportunities provide challenging and
    meaningful opportunities for successful learning.
  • Personal Responsibility link learning success to
    students' personal effort and ability.

Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in instructional
design. ERIC Digest. ED 407 930. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//www.ericdigests.or
g/1998-1/ motivation.htm
29
Motivational Strategies - Satisfaction
  • Intrinsic Reinforcement encourage and support
    intrinsic enjoyment of the learning experience.
  • Extrinsic Rewards provide positive reinforcement
    and motivational feedback.
  • Equity maintain consistent standards and
    consequences for success.

Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in instructional
design. ERIC Digest. ED 407 930. Retrieved
September 13, 2005, from http//www.ericdigests.or
g/1998-1/ motivation.htm
30
Strengths of ARCS
  • Strengths
  • Prescriptive - active and prescribes what should
    be done
  • How to - not just theory with ill-defined
    application
  • Motivational model reinforces instructional
    models for learner centered design
  • Application of ARCS model improves motivation for
    repetitive and other intrinsically uninteresting
    material
  • Forces more thorough evaluation of the audience's
    characteristics resulting in complementing more
    effective instructional strategies

Awoniyi, LeJeune, Mostek, Muller Rundle (1997).
Strengths and weaknesses of ARCS model. Retrieved
September 12, 2005, from http//ouray.cudenver.ed
u/nflejeun/doctoralweb/Courses/IT5110_Instruction
al_Dev/ARCS/critique.html
31
Weakness of ARCS
  • Weaknesses
  • Affective outcomes are difficult to
    quantitatively evaluate
  • Continuous evolution of the model makes
    evaluation difficult

Awoniyi, LeJeune, Mostek, Muller Rundle (1997).
Strengths and weaknesses of ARCS model. Retrieved
September 12, 2005, from http//ouray.cudenver.ed
u/nflejeun/doctoralweb/Courses/IT5110_Instruction
al_Dev/ARCS/critique.html
32
Philosophical Beliefs
  • My personal philosophy is based several ideas.
  • First, I believe many of the things associated
    with constructivism. I believe knowledge is a
    process and it is constructed through our
    experiences and learning is most effected by
    creating a real-world environment where learning
    is relevant. Learning should be authentic.

33
  • Second, collaborative learning gives students
    enormous advantages not available from more
    traditional instruction because a group can
    accomplish meaningful learning and solve problems
    better than any individual. In saying this, I
    like the theory of Cognitive Apprenticeship. The
    aspects that appeal to me are coaching, modeling
    and reflection.

34
  • Third, although I have never witnessed this type
    of learning in a classroom environment, I am
    intrigued by Discover Learning. I agree with the
    idea that you are more likely to learn what you
    discover.

35
  • In conclusion, one element seems to pull all
    these areas together, they are all
    learner-centered. I think this promotes a
    flexible and adaptable environment in which
    learning can be maximized.

36
References
  • Awoniyi, LeJeune, Mostek, Muller Rundle (1997).
    Strengths and weaknesses of ARCS model. Retrieved
    September 12, 2005, from http//ouray.cudenver.edu
    /nflejeun/doctoralweb/Courses/IT5110_Instructiona
    l_Dev/ARCS/critique.html
  • Barba, R. (1998). Kellers ARCS models. Retrieved
    September 13, 2005, from http//www2.sjsu.edu/dept
    s/it/edit186/karcs/sld003.html
  • Boree, G. (2005). Personality theories. Retrieved
    September 13, 2005, from http//www.ship.edu/cgbo
    eree/bandura.html
  • Cognitive Science. (2005). Stanford encyclopedia
    of philosophy. Retrieved September 12, 2005, from
    http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-scienc
    e
  • Constructivism. (2005). Retrieved September 13,
    2005, from University of Massachusetts at
    Amherst website http//www-unix.oit.umass.edu/af
    eldman/defcon.html
  • Conway, J. (1997). Educational technology's
    effect on models of instruction. Retrieved
    September 13, 2005, from http//copland.udel.edu/
    jconway/EDST666.htmdislrn
  • CSCL Theories. (2005). Retrieved September 12,
    2005, from http//www.edb.utexas.edu/csclstudent/D
    hsiao/theories.htmlvygot
  • Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning
    for instruction (2nd ed). Needham Heights, MA
    Allyn and Bacon.

37
References Continued
  • Howard Gardners Multiple Intelligence Theory.
    (2005). Retrieved September 13, 2005, from Penn
    State University website http//www.ed.psu.edu/in
    sys/ESD/gardner/MItheory.html
  • Isom, M. (1998). Retrieved September 13, 2005,
    from FSU College of Criminology and Criminal
    Justice website http//www.criminology.fsu.edu/cr
    imtheory/bandura.htm
  • Jerome Bruner. (2005). The PSI Café. Retrieved
    September 12, 2005, from http//www.psy.pdx.edu/Ps
    iCafe/KeyTheorists/Bruner.htm
  • Keller, J. M., (1983). Development and use of the
    ARCS model of motivational design. Enschede,
    Netherlands Twente Univ. of Technology. (ERIC
    Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 001).
  • Meaningful Reception Learning Schema Theory.
    (2005). Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
    Indiana University website http//education.india
    na.edu/p540/webcourse/schema.htmltop
  • Reiser, R., Dempsey, J. (2002) Instructional
    design and technology. Upper Saddle River, New
    Jersey Prentice Hall.
  • Robert Gagne. (2005). Encyclopedia of educational
    technology. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
    http//coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/gagnesevents/inde
    x.htm
  • Small, R.V. (1997). Motivation in instructional
    design. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from
    http//www.ericdigests.org/1998-1/motivation.htm

38
References Continued
  • Widmayer , S. (2005). Schema theory An
    introduction. Retrieved September 13, 2005,
    fromhttp//chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebas
    e/strategies/cognitivism/SchemaTheory.htm
  • Wilson, B., Cole, P. (1994). An
    instructional-design review of cognitive teaching
    models. Paper presented at the meeting of the
    American Educational Research Association,
    Chicago, IL.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com