Credit Risk Lecture II Hans NE Bystrm Lund University, Lund, Sweden Lund, December 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Credit Risk Lecture II Hans NE Bystrm Lund University, Lund, Sweden Lund, December 2005

Description:

S&P: 'A credit rating is S&P's opinion of the general creditworthiness of an ... Moody's: 'A credit rating is an opinion on the future ability and legal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: busi335
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Credit Risk Lecture II Hans NE Bystrm Lund University, Lund, Sweden Lund, December 2005


1
Credit RiskLecture IIHans NE ByströmLund
University, Lund, SwedenLund, December 2005
2
Todays Lecture
  • Credit Rating Systems and Agencies
  • Credit Risk Management
  • -- Diversification Portfolio modelling of
    Loans and Bonds
  • -- Insurance and Hedging Credit Derivatives
  • BIS II

3
Credit Rating Systems
  • Companies and instruments are classified into
    discrete rating categories that correspond to the
    estimated likelihood of the company failing to
    pay its obligations.
  • Most rating systems are based on both
    quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the
    firm management quality, quality of assets,
    liquidity position, cash flow management,
    industry features, firms position within the
    industry, macroeconomic factors and country risk.
  • Non-financial firms are usually treated different
    from banks and other financial institutions.

4
Credit Rating Agencies
  • StandardPoors (SP) and Moodys
  • These firms get paid to rate firms and their bond
    issues. Ratings might be reviewed once a year or
    following major events related to the firm.
  • SP A credit rating is SPs opinion of the
    general creditworthiness of an obligor with
    respect to a particular debt security or other
    financial obligation.
  • Moodys A credit rating is an opinion on the
    future ability and legal obligation of an issuer
    to make timely payments of principal and interest
    on a specific fixed-income security.

5
Credit Rating Agencies
  • corporate
    ratings
  • Issuer ratings
  • sovereign
    ratings
  • long-term
    ratings
  • Issue-specific ratings
  • short-term
    ratings

6
  • Credit Risk Management
  • Portfolio Modelling of Loans and Bonds
  • (Diversification)

7
  • Portfolio Modelling of Loans and Bonds

So far we have considered default risk and credit
risk exposure on a single borrower basis. This
may be inefficient from a risk-return
perspective. Portfolio Theory! -- (default)
correlations among loans and bonds held --
continuous adjustments of amount of loans and
bonds held
8
Portfolio Modelling of Loans and Bonds
General Portfolio
Theory The mean return and risk of a portfolio of
assets, under the assumption that returns on
individual assets are normally distributed (or
that asset managers have a quadratic utility
function) are given by
n
Rportfolio S wiRi
i1
n n s2portfolio S S wiwj si
sj ?ij i1 j1
9
Portfolio Modelling of Loans and Bonds
  • Three Problems
  • (in the particular case of using standard
    portfolio theory on loan and bond portfolios)
  • Non-Normal Loan and Bond Returns
  • Non-Traded Loans and Bonds
  • Correlations (Unobservable and ambiguous)

10
  • Credit Risk Management
  • Credit Derivatives
  • (Insurance and Hedging)

11
  • Credit Derivatives
  • Credit Derivatives allow a bank to alter the
    risk-return trade off of a loan portfolio without
    having to sell or remove loans from the balance
    sheet (without harming customer relationships)
  • BIS I does not actively encourage the use of
    credit derivatives (unfortunate)
  • BIS II acknowledges (at least partly) the risk
    mitigative effect of credit derivatives
    (promising)

12
  • Credit Derivatives
  • Credit Default Swaps
  • (insurance)
  • A credit default swap is linked to a particular
    underlying reference loan that the buyer of the
    swap typically holds in his loan portfolio.
  • The buyer (protection buyer) of the credit
    default swap will pay a fixed fee (swap premium)
    to the swap seller (protection seller) in each
    swap period (every 6 months, 12 months,...).
  • If the reference loan does not default, the
    protection buyer will receive nothing back from
    the swap seller. However, if the reference loan
    defaults, the swap seller will cover the default
    loss by making a default payment equal to the par
    value of the reference loan (minus the secondary
    market value of the defaulted loan, gt0)

13
  • Credit Derivatives
  • Credit Spread Options
  • (insurance)
  • A credit spread call option is a call option in
    which the payoff increases as the credit spread
    on a particular bond (or benchmark bond)
    increases above a certain exercise spread.
  • A bank that is concerned that the risk of a
    certain loan will increase can protect itself by
    buying a credit spread call option on the loan or
    on a correlated traded benchmark bond.

14
  • Credit Derivatives
  • Securitization
  • (hedging)
  • Loan Securitization bundling (pooling) loans
    or bonds and selling them on to other investors
    as so called Collateralized Debt Obligations
    (CDOs)
  • -- Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs)
  • -- Collateralized Bond Obligations (CBOs)
  • CLOs and CBOs are therefore simply securities
    that are collateralized by means of the loans or
    bonds.

15
  • Credit Derivatives
  • Securitization
  • An AAA rated Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) is
    set up that is completely separated (legally)
    from the bank in question.
  • The SPV issues securities (CDOs) of various
    credit qualities (classes, tranches) ranging from
    AAA (tranche A and B) down to sub-investment
    grade (equity tranche). The securities of highest
    credit quality do not default until all
    securities with lower quality have defaulted.
    Default risk is thus shifted from senior classes
    to the equity tranche.
  • Motivation risk reduction and regulatory
    arbitrage

16
Basel Capital Accords (BIS I and BIS II)
  • In 1974 the Basel Committee on Banking
    Regulations and Supervisory Practices was
    established. It is a forum for cooperation on
    banking regulative and supervisory matters. Tries
    to promote stability in the global financial
    system.
  • The Basel Committee meets at the headquarter of
    the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in
    Basel and its regulatory frameworks (Capital
    Accords) are therefore called BIS I, BIS II, etc.
  • Much of the progress in the area of (credit) risk
    measurement and management is a result of
    dissatisfaction with the current BIS I regulatory
    framework.
  • Regulation of banks is necessary for the
    stability of the financial system and the major
    implication of this is that banks must hold a
    certain amount of own equity as a reserve against
    unexpected credit losses (capital requirements)
    BIS 1 (1988) and BIS II (2006?)
  • This costs money (no, or low, return on this
    capital) ? banks want to minimize these capital
    requirements ? regulatory arbitrage

17
Basle Capital Accords (BIS I and BIS II)
  • BIS I (1988) global standard for capital
    requirements but all loans are treated equally
    (8)? banks choose to make high risk/high return
    loans (regulatory arbitrage) ? long-term
    deterioration in the credit quality of bank
    portfolios.
  • BIS II (2006?) tries to acknowledge the actual
    risk associated with a certain loan (credit
    rating of borrower, diversification) and
    acknowledges the increased usage of credit
    derivatives (off-balance-sheet credit risk) ?
    tries to create incitements for banks to manage
    its risk in an optimal way.
  • The overall regulatory capital levels, on
    average, are targeted by BIS to remain unchanged
    for the system as a whole. Its distribution among
    firms will change though.

18
The New Basel Capital Accord (BIS II)
  • BIS II capital requirements (to cover
    potential credit losses) are calculated in one of
    two alternative ways
  • The Standard Method like BIS I but instead of
    the 8 capital requirement for every loan the
    size of the capital requirement () is dependent
    on external counterparty credit ratings (Moodys
    or SP C,..,BB,..,A,..AAA).
  • The Advanced Method internal estimates of
    exposure, default probability and recovery rate
    (concentration) for the banks different
    positions instead of external ratings ? more
    flexibility
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com