Feasibility of Exploring Europas Subsurface Ocean - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Feasibility of Exploring Europas Subsurface Ocean

Description:

Time varying primary field can induce secondary field given a sphere of ... Constrains Depth of Ocean to lower bound of 19-25 km under surface ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: gpsCa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feasibility of Exploring Europas Subsurface Ocean


1
Feasibility of Exploring Europas Subsurface Ocean
Susan McDonald Sophomore- Planetary Science Ge
151a - June 2003
2
Outline
  • Background/Theories of Subsurface Ocean on Europa
  • Recent Magnetometer Data- Proof of Conducting
    Layer Near Surface in Present Epoch
  • Craters- Thickness Constraints on Ice Shell
  • Cratering morphology indicates rheological
    differences
  • Depth/diameter ratio analysis
  • Conclusions/Future Missions

3
Galileo Europa Mission (GEM)
  • Double Ridges indicate lighter, pure water-ice
    at top of slope and darker, soft material welling
    up in valley floor, where crust has pulled apart
  • Famous chaos regions show break-up and
    movement of icy crust on soft, mobile material
  • Surface topography could be caused by conducting
    ice, or ancient, frozen ocean

so how do we know if there is an ocean?
4
Magnetometer Observations
  • Jupiters magnetic dipole axis tilted with
    respect to rotation axis- Galiliean moons
    experience magnetic field varying with rotation
    frequency of Jupiter
  • Time varying primary field can induce secondary
    field given a sphere of sufficient electrical
    conductivity
  • Magnetic signature consistent with gt 70 of
    induced dipole expected of perfectly conducting
    sphere the size of Europa

Kivelson et al., 1997
5
Magnetometer Results
  • Model required currents of gt 60 mS/m within
    200-300 km of surface.
  • Subsurface oceans with salinity of earths
    oceans and a few km thick produce observed
    induction response
  • Rule out Other Possible Conductors
  • solid ice, ionosphere, or cloud of pick-up ions
    (too resistive)
  • conducting core (amplitude too small to produce
    measured field perturbation)

N
so where is this ocean- can we send probes
there?
6
Craters- Measurements
(central peak, D18km) (central pit,
D30km) (central dome, D121 km)
(dome, D138km)
Callisto/ Ganymede
low high
(2km)
SCALE BAR 30 km
(central peak, D8km) (modified pit,
D14km) (central peak, D27km)
(multiring basins, D 41km)
Europa
low high
(0.5km)
SCALE BAR 10 km
Schenk, 2002
7
Craters- Depth/Diameter Ratios
Callisto
  • Three transitions in crater shape for each icy
    satellite
  • Transition I (simple to complex crater
    morphology)
  • Same on all 3 satellites
  • Transition II (shallower craters)
  • Ganymede/Callisto- occurs at D26km
  • Europa- occurs at D8km
  • Transition III (anomalous morphologies)
  • Ganymede/Callisto- dome craters
  • Europa- shallow, multiring craters (Tyre)
  • Extreme drop in crater depth unique to icy
    satellites
  • Not due to viscous relaxation (youth of craters
    shown in presence of bright rays)
  • Most likely due to warm ice at shallow depths

N
Ganymede
Europa
Schenk, 2002
8
Craters- Analysis
  • Transitions II and III are 24 times shallower on
    Europa than on Ganymede or Callisto gt outer ice
    shell is similarly thinner on Europa
  • McKinnon and Schenk (1995) scaling relationship
    for icy satellite craters estimates transient
    (pre-modified) crater dimensions (within 10)
    from the observed crater diameters
  • Final crater shape influenced when weak layer is
    roughly 1 to 1.3 times as deep as the transient
    crater width (Schenk, 2002)
  • Europa- Transition II craters (D 8 km) scale to
    transient craters about 6 km wide, for a weak
    layer depth of 78 km
  • Europa- Transition III craters (D 30 km) scale
    to transient craters about 19 km wide, and a
    depth to the second transition of 1925 km
  • Lower bound on ice thickness gt 19-25 km

9
Conclusions
  • Magnetometer data
  • Definite proof of conducting shell- salty ocean
    is most likely electrolyte
  • Constrains ocean to existing at least in present
    epoch
  • Cratering Analysis
  • Constrains Depth of Ocean to lower bound of
    19-25 km under surface
  • Feasibility of ocean probe- not very good
    (thicker than earlier predictions of 3-4 km)
  • Future missions
  • SOUNDERS (Surface Observatories for UNDErground
    Remote-Sensing) will let us probe seismic and
    magnetic data from the surface itself
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com