The Internal Market and Competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

The Internal Market and Competition

Description:

Free markets efficient in theory (market failure) Make markets ... Dismantling of: material barriers. technical barriers. tax barriers. Means. Instruments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: hwal3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Internal Market and Competition


1
The Internal Market and Competition
Lecture structure
The Single MarketSchengenCompetition
Douane
2
Three domains of public policy
  • Expenditure
  • Distributive
  • Re-Distributive
  • Macroeconomic policies
  • Regulation

3
Two outcomes of economic policies
  • Redistribution vs.
  • Efficiency (Pareto optimality)
  • Free markets efficient in theory (market failure)
  • Make markets bigger to gain efficiency (win-win)!
  • Economies of scale
  • Mutual benefits through absolute and relative
    advantages

Benefit B
Benefit A
4
Economies of Scale and Trade
Can sell max. 100 units of X Old machine Sell
unit for 1 Costs 80 cent/unit
Cannot produce X (but usualy Y,Z)
Country B
Country A
5
Economies of Scale and Trade
Can now sell 200 units of X Buy new machine
Sell unit for 90 cent Costs 40 cent/unit
Cannot produce X (but usualy Y,Z) Gets X cheaply
Country B
Country A
6
Absolute Advantage (Smith)
  • Absolute advantage
  • 1 unit of labour in Scotland 80 units of wool or
    20 units of wine
  • 1 unit of labour in Spain 50 units of wool or 75
    units of wine
  • Each country has one absolute advantage
    (efficient producers)
  • Specialisation (economies of scale) and trade are
    beneficial

7
Comparative Advantage (Ricardo)
  • Country does not have to be the most efficient
    (cheapest) producer
  • Its sufficient to be the cheapest producer in
    terms of opportunitiy costs
  • Opportunity costs of X reduced production of Y

8
Comparative Advantage
  • A can produce 100 units of wine or 200 units of
    cheese
  • B can produce 200 units of wine or 200 units of
    cheese
  • Opportunity cost of 1 unit of wine
  • In B not produce 1 unit of cheese
  • In A not produce 2 units of cheese
  • Opportunity cost of 1 unit of cheese
  • in B not produce 1 unit of wine
  • In A not produce 0.5 units of wine
  • A has relative advantage in cheese production, B
    in wine production
  • Both countries can gain from specialisation and
    trade

9
Before Trade
10
After Trade
total consumption of (cheaper) wine can increase
without (opportunity) costs (foregone cheese
consumption)!
11
Historical blueprints
  • Hanseatic league (11th-15th century) water and
    land trade, fairs in France, Storage houses in
    Russia, Denmark, cash cheques instead of money,
    common rules
  • German Zollverein (1834) - Economic Routes to
    Political Unity?
  • Customs and Currency Unions BeLux (1921/23)
    BeNeLux (1944/47)
  • Post War Europe Mixed Economies, Interdependence
    and Multilateralism
  • Pressures for Integration economic or political?

12
The Four Freedoms of the European Single Market
13
The Single Market Programme
14
The stages of economic integration in the EU
15
Economic integration to achieve competitiveness
  • Why did a customs union (the EC) decide to
    increase the pace of economic integration during
    the 1980s and 1990s?
  • Increasing globalisation of the world economy
    (increased competition, especially from the US,
    Japan, and the NICs Newly Industrialised
    Countries)
  • More sophisticated systems to dodge trade
    barriers (multinational corporations)
  • Belief that market fragmentation (nationally
    divided markets) was reducing economies of scale

16
The limits of European competitiveness
  • The costs of the non-Europe (Cecchini, 1991)
  • Physical barriers Intra-European stoppages,
    controls at border checkpoints, bureaucracy,
    different currencies
  • Technical barriers Different national product
    standards and technical regulations across Member
    States
  • Fiscal barriers Lack of fiscal harmonisation

17
The expected benefits of economic integration
  • Cecchini report (1988). Cost saving effects
  • Static trade effect benefits from allowing
    public authorities to buy from the cheapest
    suppliers
  • Competition effect Downward pressure on prices
    as a result of greater competition
  • Restructuring effect Reorganisation of
    industrial sectors and individual companies as a
    result of greater competition
  • Other possible benefits
  • Benefits on investment, innovation
    (rationalisation of RD expenditure) and growth
  • Savings for the public sector (lower government
    subsidies for inefficient firms

18
The expected benefits of economic integration (II)
  • Combination of cost saving effects results in two
    kinds of benefits
  • Direct benefits from the eradication of economic
    borders
  • Indirect benefits from economic restructuring,
    increases in trade and competition and greater
    economies of scale
  • Result
  • The emergence of virtuous cycles of innovation
    and competition
  • Lowering of prices for consumers
  • Greater job creation

19
Estimation of benefits
  • Cecchini (1988) 4 to 7 of Europes GDP

20
Economic impact of the SMP
http//europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/10years/
background_en.htm
21
Problems
  • Price variation remains high
  • Delay in market rule transposition and
    implementation
  • Mutual recognition of standards still problematic
  • Cultural differences have an impact (preference
    of domestic market, understandings of health and
    safety)
  • Financial services insufficiently liberalized
    (hah!)
  • Labour mobility low

22
De-Regulation and Re-Regulation
  • Single Market removed many rules negative
    integration
  • Market Failures
  • Technical standards/consumer protection
    (information)
  • Health, safety, environmental standards (negative
    externalities)
  • Competition policies (monopolistic markets etc.)
  • Industry regulators (natural monopolies)

23
Competition policy
H. Walkenhorst, University of Essex
  • European Commission (positive regulation)
  • merger control
  • prohibition of unfair market protection and
    restrictive practices
  • Abuse of dominant position, monopoly
  • state aid
  • Liberalization of utilities

24
State Aids
H. Walkenhorst, University of Essex
  • State aids forbidden except
  • 1. Special help at times of natural disaster
  • 2. Aid to depressed regions
  • 3. Aid to promote new economic activities

25
Environmental and Social Policies
  • De-Regulation, harmonized regulation, and
    competition policies efficiency
  • Environmental and Social Policies allocation of
    values
  • EU promotes high level of environmental standards
    (SEA)
  • Social policies rather underdeveloped (but
    Anti-discrimination)

26
Conclusions
  • Europe as an uncompleted market
  • Twin approach of regulation and liberalisation
  • Spill-over effects to domestic, neighbouring
    and global markets political implications for
    national economic strategies and philosophies

27
Class questions
  • To what extent have the obstacles to an internal
    European market been removed by the 1992
    programme?
  • How has the market developed in the last 17 years
    and why is it still not completed?
  • Should it be completed?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com