The diffuse X-ray emission from the Galactic center - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The diffuse X-ray emission from the Galactic center

Description:

Dissipation efficiency: - Strong viscous coefficient ... Heating by the dissipation of the gravitational and kinetic energy of molecular ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: etu57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The diffuse X-ray emission from the Galactic center


1
The diffuse X-ray emission from the Galactic
center     
R. Belmont CESR, Toulouse, France
Collaborators M. Tagger (CEA/APC, France) M.
Morris (UCLA, US) M. Muno (Caltech, US)
2
Outline
  • The diffuse emission issue at the Galactic center
  • Diffuse plasma ?
  • Unresolved discrete point sources ?
  • Ideas to solve the diffuse plasma paradox
  • Confinement of the plasma ? Heavy helium plasma
  • Heating ? Viscous friction with dense molecular
    clouds

3
The Galactic Center Region
  • Central zone
  • X-ray view
  • Strong emission
  • Radio view
  • Non thermal filaments
  • ? Vertical B (10?G - 1mG)
  • IR view
  • The central molecular zone (MorrisSerabyn 1996)
  • Gas condensed in clouds (Bally et al. 87)
    N100, R 5 pc, v 100 km s-1

4
The GC X-ray emission
At the Galactic center The diffuse emission (DE)
profile is different from that of the resolved
point sources (RPS) emission (Suzaku, Koyama et
al. 2006). ? diffuse plasma ?
5
Problems with a diffuse plasma ?(Kaneda et al.,
1997)
  • Energy problem confinement of the plasma
  • cs 1500km/s vesc 1100-1200 km/s ?
    the gas escapes
  • very fast escape tesc 40 000 yr
  • required power is huge (gt 1 SN/3-300 yr in the
    central region)
  • Heating mechanism
  • If confined radiative cooling time 108 yr
  • Heating mechanism still needed

6
Confining the plasma (Belmont et al. 2005)
  • Species of different mass have different wills
  • - As in planetary atmospheres confinement ?
    comparison of vth and vesc
  • - 1-species plasma (e-)

7
The hot He plasma vs. Observations
  • At 8 keV, H ad He are fully ionized
  • ? no direct diagnostic on the major species
  • Re-interpretation of spectral data
  • ? weaker number densities n(He) 0.3 n(H)
  • ? Similar e- and mass densities
  • ? Smaller abundances (Fe/He)He 0.3
    (Fe/He)H
  • ? Recent observations with Suzaku Fe 3.5
    Fesolar ? He plasma with solar abundances
  • Stratification
  • ? Heavy ions could sediment (?sed 108 yr)
  • If the stratification is observed (He continuum,
    Fe line) evidence for a plasma confined by
    gravity
  • The origin of the continuum is uncertain
    (confusion from the many components).
  • Observation at energy gt 7 keV (Fe and Ni lines
    continuum) with Simbol-X will clarify the
    spectral components in this spectral region.
  • ? Spectra at several latitudes may give access to
    the vertical structure of the plasma for the iron
    line and the He continuum.

8
A possible heating mechanism
  • Radiative cooling of the confined plasma
  • Heating by the dissipation of the gravitational
    and kinetic energy of molecular clouds by the
    strong viscosity (Re 10-2)
  • Dissipation efficiency
  • - Strong viscous coefficient
  • - Subsonic motion vc lt cs lt va ? weak
    compression
  • - The precise flow structure around clouds must
    be studied

9
The inviscid Alfvén wake
  • Alfvén wing
  • (Drell et al. 1965, Neubauer 1980)
  • Echo-I in the earth magnetosphere
  • Io in the Jovian magnetosphere

strong energy flux !
10
Viscous dissipation
Dissipation by - Non linear effects -
Curvature of the field lines
Strong outgoing Alfvén flux !
  • For most of the expected values for the magnetic
    field, dissipation in the Alfvén wings
    (BelmontTagger 2006)
  • is very efficient
  • balance the radiative cooling
  • can account for the observed hot plasma

? 3D-MHD numerical simulations with the Zeus code
are in progress to validate and extend these
results
11
Conclusion
  • The diffuse plasma issue is particularly
    interesting at the GC
  • Stronger gravitational potential
  • High concentration of molecular gas
  • Vertical structured magnetic field
  • Its nature is very debated.
  • Point sources (CVs) not enough of them ?
  • Diffuse plasma should not exist since it must
    escape
  • The escape of light protons naturally leaves a
    confined plasma made of He
  • Its heating can be achieved by the viscous
    dissipation of the kinetic energy of molecular
    clouds.

12
And Simbol-X
  • General input for the GRGC diffuse emission
    (previous talks)
  • Thermal/Non thermal nature
  • lines high energy continuum
  • Diffuse plasma/Discrete sources
  • High resolution mapping at high energy
  • Precise source identification and counting at
    high energy
  • Specific input for the GC diffuse emission
  • Good identification at high energy where the
    source confusion is high
  • Look for vertical stratification (thanks to
    better constrains at high energy on the continuum
    origin)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com