U'S' States Credit Scorecard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

U'S' States Credit Scorecard

Description:

There are several factors that help to explain the lower risk profile of states ... State's cannot file for bankruptcy. Large and diverse tax bases ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: moody5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U'S' States Credit Scorecard


1
U.S. States Credit Scorecard
  • Nicole Johnson
  • Senior Vice President
  • State Ratings

NAST New Orleans December 5, 2006
2
State Ratings are Very High
  • Average State rating is Aa2
  • Moodys Ratings of public finance bonds have
    average rating of A1
  • Corporate ratings average is A3

3
Moodys Public Finance Ratings
Long -Term Ratings
Aaa
Highest quality
High quality
Aa1/Aa2/Aa3
Investment Grade
A1/A2/A3
Upper Medium quality
Baa1/Baa2/Baa3
Medium quality
Ba1/Ba2Ba3 B1/B2/B3
Speculative elements
Below Investment Grade
Caa1/Caa2/Caa3
Danger of/in default
4
Credit Strengths of U.S. States
  • There are several factors that help to explain
    the lower risk profile of states and tax-backed
    essential service bond issuers
  • States cannot file for bankruptcy
  • Large and diverse tax bases
  • Ability to raise taxes or cut spending
  • Full faith and credit general obligation pledge
  • Related government support

5
G.O. Rating Factors
Debt Factors
Economy
The Rating
Financial Performance
Management
6
Scorecard Purpose
  • Provide a guide/analytical discipline to buttress
    consistency.
  • Further build on State Rating Methodology
    published November 2004.
  • Provide clear relative rankings of the states in
    the most important quantifiable areas.
  • Open architecture preserves flexibility to change
    variables as new data becomes available or
    methodology evolves.

7
Not a rating predictor model
  • Ratings are forward looking
  • Ratings take into account important factors that
    are not easily quantifiable.
  • Results correlate closely, in most cases, with
    relative rating categories

8
How is the Scorecard Used?
  • Scorecard is used internally for analytical
    guidance and transparency
  • Scorecard was published August 2006
  • Increase transparency
  • Provide data and analytics for Moodys MFRA
    product

9
Scorecard Format
  • Scoring is stepwise

1 Credit Score
4 Categories
13 Variables
4 Variables
Finance
30
4 Variables
20
Economics
A V E R A G E S
Credit Score
20
3 Variables
Debt
30
2 Variables
Management
10
Finance Variables
  • Five Year Average Fund Ratio
  • Five Year Tax Revenue Growth
  • Five Year Expenditure Growth
  • Borrowing for Operations (Yes/No)
  • 1. Short-term cash flow borrowing - last two
    years
  • 2. Long-term borrowing for operating budget
    most recent fiscal year
  • 3. Long-term borrowing for operating budget any
    of three prior fiscal years

11
Debt Variables
  • Ten-Year Growth in Net Tax-Supported Debt as of
    State Personal Income
  • Net Tax-Supported Debt to State Tax Revenues
  • State Pension Funding Ratio

12
Economic Variables
  • Ten-Year Growth in State Per-Capita Income as
    of US Average (BEA)
  • Five-Year State Employment Growth (BLS)
  • Five-Year Domestic Net Migration as of US Total
    (Census)
  • State Poverty Rate (Census)

13
Governance Framework Variables
  • 1. Institutional Financial Flexibility (Yes/No)
  • a. Inflexible spending mandates and/or revenue
    limits
  • b. Initiatives and referenda
  • c. Super-majority requirements
  • d. Timely budget adoption

14
Governance Framework Variables (cont.)
  • 2. Fiscal Best Practices (Yes/No)
  • a. Consensus revenue forecasting
  • b. Multi-year financial planning
  • c. Executive branch mid-year spending reduction
    powers
  • d. Debt affordability
  • e. Timely audited financial reporting last two
    fiscal years

15
Scorecard Limitations
  • Ranking approach possibly distorts relative
    performance
  • - distance between states in ranking may not
    reflect true distance in performance
  • Retrospective data is historic and does not
    capture current trends
  • Key data variables do not fully capture
    complexity of state finances and credit
  • Analyst input regarding qualitative factors
    augments these limitations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com