Phonetic details in prosodic phenomena - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Phonetic details in prosodic phenomena

Description:

Summary of German intonation (in terms of KIM) In the Kiel Intonation Model (KIM, Kohler 1991), these attitudinal meanings have ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: bft
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Phonetic details in prosodic phenomena


1
Phonetic details in prosodic phenomena
  • Oliver Niebuhr
  • Presentation at the Laboratoire de Phonétique et
    Phonologie, Paris 3
  • January, 30th, 2009
  • oliver.niebuhr_at_lpl-aix.fr

2
Summary of German intonation (in terms of KIM)
  • A number of attitudinal meanings are known to be
    signalled in German by prosodic means
  • The speaker can convey that an information is
  • (a) settled, concluding
  • (b) presenting, open(ing)
  • (c) astonishing
  • Furthermore, speaker can
  • (d) superordinate or
  • (e) subordinate her/himself to the dialogue
    partner
  • The specific interpretations of these attitudinal
    meanings may vary depending on the semantic
    composition and the linguistic structure of the
    utterance
  • In negative contexts (a) may be interpreted as
    resignation and (c) as disbelieving / taken
    aback
  • (d) and (e) can convey statement and question

3
Summary of German intonation (in terms of KIM)
  • In the Kiel Intonation Model (KIM, Kohler 1991),
    these attitudinal meanings have been assigned to
    pitch-accent categories
  • The KIM distinguishes between 2 basic
    phonological classes of pitch movements
  • rising-falling peaks
  • G
  • (falling)-rising valleys
  • Co-occur with accented (i.e. perceptually
    salient) syllables
  • Timing is phonological, not phonetic (?
    alignment) ? synchronization
  • Relevant according to Kohler (1987, 1991) F0
    maximum (peaks) or minimum (valleys) relative to
    the accented-vowel boundaries (onsets)

4
Summary of German intonation (in terms of KIM)
  • early peaks ? F0 max. before acc.Von
    settled, concl.
  • medial peaks ? F0 max. after acc.Von
    presenting
  • late peaks ? F0 max. after acc.Voff
    astonishing
  • early/late valleys ? F0 min. before/after
  • acc.Von subordination /
  • ? questioning

Did you hear me
Answer hmmnot exactly.
Answer yes, sure.
5
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • The reference to the accented-vowel boundaries in
    the KIM originates from peak-shift experiments by
    Kohler (1987, 1991).
  • On the other hand, his experiments showed that
    the location of the category boundary is shifted
    for different stimulus utterances (Kohler 1991)
  • Sie hat ja gelogen lateral vowel
  • Sie ist ja geritten fricative vowel
  • Sie hat ja gejodelt approximant vowel
  • Why?

? earlier boundary
? later boundary
6
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Niebuhr (2006, 2007c) maybe, it is not the
    segment boundary between CV in terms of a
    spectral change (e.g., formant transitions) that
    matters, but the increasing / decreasing
    intensity into and out of the accented vowel
  • The intensity change is more abrupt for sequences
    nasalvowel or lateralvowel than for
    approximantvowel.
  • It also depends on the vowel quality itself.
  • Starting from this idea,
  • Two f0 peak shift series were resynthesized
  • One using the stimulus utterance Sie war mal
    Malerin
  • The other hand keeps exactly the F0 and intensity
    patterns of the Malerin series, but on a
    constant Schwa-like vowel quality ( HUM in
    praat)
  • So, basically, the two stimulus series (Malerin
    and HUM) differ just with regard to the
    presence / absence of the segmental string.
  • Two parallel perception experiments with two
    separate groups of subjects
  • Indirect identification for Malerin series
  • AXB test for HUM series

7
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
Indirect identification of inton. categories via
meaning
Context Stimulus
Test Stimuli
8
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
9
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
10
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
11
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
Malerin series
  • The dynamics of the perceptual change from
    early to medial decreases with decreasing
    dynamics of the underlying intensity change.
  • The same effect shows up, if a less pointed F0
    peak is shifted.
  • A comparable effect of the dynamics of the F0 and
    intensity courses on the pitch-accent perception
    can be found for peak-shift series from medial
    to late, based on a manipulation of the
    decreasing intensity at the VC boundary

12
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Conclusions of Niebuhr (2006, 2007c) The picture
    sketched by Kohler (1987, 1991) must be refined
  • The abruptness of the perceptual changes between
    early, medial, and late is not determined
    by the categories themselves.
  • The change from early to medial can be turned
    into a gradual one
  • ? The change from medial to late can be made
    categorical
  • The signalling of early, medial, and late
    is based on an interplay between F0 and intensity
    changes (or levels).
  • ? The findings support the central claim of the
    KIM that the synchronization of the
    (rising-falling) F0-peak contour relative to the
    vowel boundaries is decisive for the pitch-accent
    identification
  • The findings can explain to some extent, why
    different alignment patterns of the F0 peaks are
    found for different structures and segmental
    compositions of the accent syllable and the
    adjacent syllables. They also make sense in terms
    of articulatory anchoring.

13
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
14
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
mmm
15
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • ? Implication Synchronization itself is not
    phonological it is an effective, economic tool
    that speakers can use to highlight different
    parts of the pitch pattern by making use of the
    intensity pattern that results from the segmental
    string
  • Alternative, complementary strategies changing
    the overall peak shape, changing intensity
    levels, changing segment durations and
    articulations (e.g., openness of the vowel,
    sibilant / intrinsic pitch)

16
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Intonational difference in focus phrase-final
    (nuclear) high-rising valleys vs. terminal
    falling peaks
  • Segments (Phonemes) in focus
  • Phrase-final /?/
  • Like /t/ aspiration, it can create sibilant
    pitch and is therefore particularly likely to
    vary systematically according to the peak-valley
    difference.
  • Moreover /?/ is realized in German with rounding
    ?? this rounding does typically characterize
    already the preceding vowel ? e.g., Tisch
    t????.
  • So, is /?/ in the context of a high-rising valley
    lighter than in the context of a terminal falling
    peak? Is rounding involved in this effect? If so,
    then the effect should already be noticeable in
    the vowel preceding /?/.

17
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Intonational difference in focus phrase-final
    (nuclear) high-rising valleys vs. terminal
    falling peaks
  • Segments (Phonemes) in focus
  • Phrase-final /x/
  • It is also able to convey pitch by means of
    changes in the energy pattern of the noise
    spectrum
  • Moreover following /u/, /x/ is realized as a
    rounded velar fricative x?.
  • So, is /x/ in the context of a high-rising valley
    lighter than in the context of a terminal falling
    peak? Is rounding involved in this effect? If so,
    then the effect should already be noticeable in
    the vowel /u/ preceding /x/.

18
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Intonational difference in focus phrase-final
    (nuclear) high-rising valleys vs. terminal
    falling peaks
  • Segments (Phonemes) in focus
  • Phrase-final lt-ergt word endings
  • It is realized as a vocoid sound ?, which is
    known to show considerable dialectal variation
    between ?? and ?
  • So, is it also influenced by the coinciding
    intonation categories? If so, is it lighter (more
    fronted and/or open) in connection with
    high-rising valleys?
  • Phrase-final /?/
  • Its phonetic quality is known to be strongly
    context dependent in German
  • So, is /?/ lighter (more fronted and/or open) in
    connection with high-rising valleys?

19
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Pairs of target words (increases the n)
  • Tisch, Fisch ? /?/ with preceding /?/
  • Buch, Tuch ? /x/ with preceding /u/
  • lecker, Bäcker ? lt-ergt realized as ?
  • Tage, Schramme ? /?/
  • Placed sentence- and hence phrase-finally in
    contexts of high-rising valleys and terminal
    falling peaks
  • Acoustic analysis, including
  • F2 (based on LPC LTAS) at three points in the
    vowels 20ms after onset, centre, 20ms before
    offset
  • Centre-of-Gravity (CoG) determined every 7ms in
    the fricatives and then averaged across the whole
    fricative segment.
  • Segment durations of vowels and fricatives

sibilant pitch
intrinsic vowel pitch
20
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Corpus recorded with quasi-spontaneous, informal
    sounding speech, using an improved method of
    Kohler und Niebuhr (2007)
  • This means
  • Written dialogue texts with informal, everyday
    contents/situations.
  • Target words are integrated sentence-finally
    without highlighting.
  • The high-rising valleys and terminal falling
    peaks as well as the corresponding accented
    syllables are elicited solely by creating
    appropriate semantic-pragmatic contexts.
  • Dialogues were produced by good friends.
  • They were allowed to modify the texts according
    to their own way of speaking (e.g., by
    introducing or exchanging words and particles).
  • One of the speakers was the experimenter (me) he
    tried to guide the subject with regard to
    speaking style, and his productions were part of
    the pragmatic context.
  • Every dialogue was produced 4 times in a row, and
    only the last two productions were used for the
    acoustic analysis.
  • So far, 5 subjects have been recorded (? n20),
    10 are planned.

21
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Results for Tisch and Fisch
  • The sibilant /?/ is considerably lighter in the
    contexts of the high-rising valley. This is
    reflected in significantly different mean CoG
    values. The fricative durations, however, do not
    differ significantly.
  • Also the productions of /?/ differ depending on
    the intonation context. That is, F2 (middle) is
    significantly higher after the high-rising
    valley.
  • Supported by perceptual analysis, this effect
    involves de-rounding.

22
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Results for Buch and Tuch
  • The fricative /x/ is considerably lighter in the
    contexts of the high-rising valley. This is
    reflected in significantly different mean CoG
    values. The fricative durations, however, do not
    differ significantly.
  • Also the productions of /u/ differ slightly in
    the way that the F2 (middle) tends to be higher
    after the high-rising valley.
  • Supported by perceptual analysis, this is again
    due to de-rounding.

peak
valley
23
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Results for lecker and Bäcker
  • The vocoid realizations of the word ending lt-ergt
    are not consistently lighter in connection with
    the high-rising valley. Such an effect i.e. a
    higher F2 can only be observed in tendency
    towards the end of the sound.
  • ? in connection with the high-rising valley lt-ergt
    becomes a diphthongized ???, which also tends
    to be longer than in connection of the terminal
    falling peak.

peak
valley
650 1650
700 1300
24
The signalling of early, medial, and late peaks
  • Results for Tage and Schramme
  • The productions of /?/ are lighter, i.e. they
    show a significantly higher F2 at the centre and
    towards the end of the vowel in connection with
    the high-rising valley.
  • However, the vowel durations do not differ
    significantly depending on the intonational
    context.

peak
valley
25
Summary of the intonational part
  • We know that the F0 course contributes to the
    coding of segments
  • F0 rise or fall before/after obstruents is a
    fortis-lenis cue (Kohler 1979)
  • F0 relative to F1 determines the vowel quality
    (Traunmüller 1985)
  • Position of F0 turning points cues word
    boundaries (DImperio 2000,Petrone 2008)
  • (...)

26
Summary of the intonational part
Intonation
Lexeme, Phoneme, Phone
  • We need not forget that the segmental string is
    not (just) a troublemaker for the
  • coding of intonational units
  • The segmental contribution can the of two
    different kinds
  • direct e.g., by intensity-based highlighting of
    parts of the F0 course, by conveying
  • different sibilant or intrinsic (i.e.
    vowel-based) pitches
  • indirect e.g., by articulatory metaphers of
    attitudinal meanings, i.e. long, soft, and
  • light articulations for astonishment vs. short,
    loud, dark articulations for conclusions
  • or superordinations, etc.

27
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Based on a recent investigation of Niebuhr et al.
    (2008) within the S2S research network
  • Starting from a corpus of read speech that
    comprised 72 sentences that may be subdivided
    into three subsets
  • (1) the 8 possible sibilant sequences across word
    boundaries that result from the cross-combination
    of the features 'alveolar', 'postalveolar' and
    'voiced', 'voiceless', i.e. (a) /s?/, (b) /?s/,
    (c) /z?/, (d) /?z/, (e) /s?/, (f) /?s/, (g) /?z/,
    and (h) /z?/ ? placed in the symmetrical vowel
    contexts /i/___/i/, /a/___/a/, and /u/___/u/ (
    24).
  • (2) (a) /s?/, (b) /?s/, (c) /z?/, (d) /?z/ framed
    by the 6 asymmetrical vowel contexts ( 24).
  • (3) each of the 4 individual sibilants /s/, /?/,
    /z/, and /?/ paired across word boundaries with a
    labial consonant (C) like /p/ or /v/ in the two
    possible orders __C and C__ and framed by
    symmetrical vowel contexts ? reference qualities
    for the sibilants (24).
  • All 72 sentences were read 4 times in a
    randomized order by 4 female native speakers of
    French

28
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Based on a recent investigation of Niebuhr et al.
    (2008) within the S2S research network
  • Starting from a corpus of read speech that
    comprised 72 sentences that may be subdivided
    into three subsets
  • (1) /u?su/ Tu te couches sous l'drap
  • (2) /as?a/ C'est une classe chargée
  • (3) /uz?u/ J'ai vendu douze journaux
  • (4) /az?a/ C'est une phrase japonaise
  • (5) /a?Ca/ Tu te caches facilement
  • (6) /izCi/ Il a une devise vitale
  • (7) /aCsa/ Elle tape sa soeur

29
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Measurements
  • Spectral
  • range and mean
  • of the CoG across
  • the whole section
  • Duration
  • of the whole section
  • of the individual
  • sibilants were
  • possible

30
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Results in the temporal domain
  • If there were two spectrally separable sibilant
    sections, the postalveolar was always the longer
    one.
  • Overall, the
  • sequences
  • were around
  • twice as long
  • as the single
  • references,
  • alv.-postalv.
  • in tendency
  • even more
  • than
  • postalv.-alv.

31
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Results in the frequency domain
  • The alveolar-postalveolar as well as the
    postalveolar-alveolar sequences were both
    spectrally
  • shifted in a comparable
  • way towards the
  • postalveolar references.

32
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Conclusions
  • Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
    is a gradual rather than a categorical phenomenon
  • It is feature-determined, not direction-determined
    . The target is postalveolar. Consequently, it is
    regressive in alveolar-postalveolar and
    progressive in postalveolar-alveolar sequences.
  • ? Elle remâche sa viande /?s/ ? ?
  • ? Cest une classe chargée /s?/ ? ?
  • The assimilated alveolar-postalveolar and
    postalveolar-alveolar sequences can have
    phonetically identical manifestations in terms of
    both temporal and spectral values.
  • But are these sequences really ambiguous?

33
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • Nolan (1992) found for English that word-final
    /d/s which were completely assimilated to
    following word-initial /g/s (in terms of EPG
    patterns) were still identified as /d/s by his
    subjects.
  • He ascribed this effect to differences in the
    preceding vowel.
  • Starting from this interesting observation, which
    was not further pursued so far, we investigated
    whether the vowels that preceded the assimilated
    /s?/ and /?s/ sibilant sequences in French show
    differences in phonetic details that can be used
    by listeners to identify the even those following
    sibilant sequences as /s?/ or /?s/ that are
    ambiguously realized as ?.

34
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • This is what we found for vowel duration and
    vowel intensity
  • The vowels /a, i, u/ were significantly longer
    when they preceded /?s/ (on average 15-20ms, up
    to 60ms).
  • The vowels /a, i, u/ were significantly louder
    when they preceded /s?/ (on average 2-3dB, up to
    5dB).

35
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
  • And in addition we found for voice quality
  • The vowels /a, i, u/ were significantly breathier
    when preceded by /?s/.
  • The voice quality was represented by the harmonic
    ratios H1/H2, based on narrow band DFT spectral
    at three points in the vowel 20ms after onset,
    centre, 20ms before offset.
  • On the other hand, the vowels before /s?/
    sometimes show a short section of /h/-like
    friction before the actual sibilant sets in (
    different timing of breath?)

36
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
/s?/
/?s/
37
Place assimilation in French sibilant sequences
/s?/
/?s/
38
Summary of the assimilation part
  • Initial perceptual tests were done in which (a)
    just the CV part of the first target syllable and
    (b) just the sibilant section itself was played
    to non-naïve native speakers of French. The
    preliminary results show that the listeners were
    only able for (a) to predict beyond change level
    whether the upcoming sibilant sequence was /s?/
    or /s?/.
  • So, the multi-parametric phonetic details in the
    vowels preceding the sibilant sequences might
    already be acoustic cues to the phonological
    make-up of the sibilant sequence, even if the
    phonetic realization of the latter is by itself
    ambiguous.
  • This suggests that the term gradual has a
    temporal implication beyond the sibilant sequence
    itself.
  • Moreover, the fine phonetic differences in the
    vowels were not found in the same way before
    single, non-assimilated sibilant. This might be
    taken as evidence that place assimilation within
    French sibilant sequences represents a
    re-organization rather than a (gradual)
    substitution of phonological features, in line
    with previous findings of many other assimilation
    processes across languages.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com