Employee Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Employee Selection

Description:

Motor, Physical, Mechanical, Clerical, Sensory, Musical, Tools and Equipment ... Halo (Horns) Effect. Contrast (compare to another candidate) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: barr84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Employee Selection


1
Employee Selection
  • Determining the characteristics (KSAs) for
    successful job performance and then measuring
    applicants on those characteristics.

2
Selection Process
  • Identify major tasks, job requirements and
    performance outcomes via job analysis
  • Rate importance of each KSA (Predictor) for
    performance (Criterion)
  • Specify other characteristics needed for the job
    (licenses, personality, work schedule)
  • Choose test(s) that measure important KSAs

3
Importance of Employee Selection
  • Economic
  • Cost of selection process
  • Opportunity cost of inappropriate choice and low
    job performance
  • Turnover costs
  • Training costs

4
Importance of Employee Selection
  • Legal
  • Minimize EEO Exposure- Although validation is not
    required by law- all selection methods should be
    job related (valid) to defend against adverse
    impact charges
  • Negligent hiring
  • Defamation

5
Selection A Two Way Street
  • The Organization and the Candidate have a lot at
    stake in the Selection Decision
  • Costs (Financial, Opportunity)
  • Time (Effort/Energy)
  • Job Expectations
  • Contextual Expectations
  • Personal
  • Career
  • Development
  • Performance

6
Selection v. Hiring
  • Hiring is when a job offer is extended without
    evaluating an applicants KSAs to the job
    requirements.
  • Selection involves both collecting and evaluating
    an applicants KSAs to the job requirements in
    order to make a decision whether or not to extend
    a job offer.

7
(No Transcript)
8
MEASUREMENT DEVISE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
  • Reliability
  • Validity

9
Reliability of Selection Device
  • Extent test or any measuring device provides
    consistent information across time and judges
  • An individuals score on the same or like test
    should not vary significantly
  • Degree of measurement error selection in
    instrument

10
Reliability of a Selection Device
  • Sources of measurement error
  • poor sampling of material
  • chance response tendencies
  • changes in test conditions
  • changes in the person
  • Necessary but not sufficient condition for
    validity

11
Validity of a Selection Device
  • How well does the selection devise measure future
    job performance for a specific job
  • Is it job related?
  • Does it measure what its supposed to measure
  • Is the test a good proxy for future performance?

12
Types of Validity
  • Criterion-Related (Empirical) Validity
  • Indirect measures of future performance
  • Extent of correlation of scores on selection
    measures and job performance
  • Exp. GPA and sales revenue
  • Type
  • Predictive
  • Concurrent

13
Criterion-Related Validity
Predictive Concurrent
Measure Performance of those Hired
Test Existing Employees
Measure their Performance
Test Applicants
TIME TIME
14
Types of Validity
  • Content Validity
  • Direct assessment of job tasks and behaviors
  • Extent content of measure reflects content of job
  • exp. Typing test

15
Selection Methods
  • Biographical data (biodata)
  • Weighted Application Blanks
  • Biographical information blanks
  • Predictor of tenure and performance
  • Legal Issues
  • Application Forms
  • Inexpensive
  • Substantial information
  • Items should be job related
  • EEO Items cannot ask versus should not ask

16
Selection Methods
  • Background Checks
  • Verification of information
  • Letters of Recommendation/References
  • In general not valid because most are positive -
    They do not discriminate on ability to perform
    the job.

17
Reference Checks
  • Negligent Hiring (Employer Liability)
  • Privacy and Defamation Issues
  • Employers have Qualified Privilege
  • Must be accurate
  • job related
  • Avoid EEO information
  • Provided to individuals with right to know

18
Cognitive Ability Tests
  • Intelligence and Mental Abilities
  • Deductive reasoning, math/verbal comprehension
  • A measure of ability to learn and adapt to
    changing conditions

19
Special Ability/ Aptitude Tests
  • Motor, Physical, Mechanical, Clerical, Sensory,
    Musical, Tools and Equipment
  • Achievement/Job Knowledge Tests
  • Work Samples and Simulations
  • Assess ability to perform job directly
  • Highly valid (Content Valid)

20
Assessment Centers
  • It is not a Test It is a Process!!!
  • Multiple tests and multiple assessors
  • Leaderless group, in-baskets, management games,
    paper and pencil tests, presentations, interviews
  • Expenive, valid, unbiased predictor

21
Personality Tests
  • Historically low reliability and validity
  • Self report
  • Projective
  • Validity depends on
  • Type of job
  • Type of job performance measure

22
Honesty Tests
  • Polygraph use restricted by Polygraph Protection
    Act
  • Handwriting Analysis
  • Paper and Pencil Honest Tests
  • False Positives and Social Stigma
  • Issue of Validity (for most)

23
Medical Examinations
  • Testing for Drugs and Alcohol
  • Notify at the beginning of the selection process
  • Administer at time of preliminary consideration
    or offer
  • Physical Requirements
  • Must be Job Related
  • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Can require exam after the job offer
  • Key Issue Chain of Custody (Privacy)

24
Departmental Interview
  • Conducted by Managers, Supervisors or Employees
    of the Employing Department
  • Purpose is to evaluate an applicants Technical
    Knowledge Skill
  • Potential Problems
  • Untrained departmental interviewers
  • Assessment of non-job related criteria
  • Prejudice

25
The Employment Interview
  • Most common selection device
  • Criticized for Poor Reliability and Validity
  • - because the interviewer is the
  • measurement device
  • Too many interviewing experts (at least
  • within their own mind)
  • Too much time too little acquired relevant
  • information

26
Type
  • Unstructured- Nondirective interview
  • questions are asked as they come to mind
  • no set format
  • may be a good measure of fit
  • Structured
  • questions and answers specified in advance
  • more valid
  • lack flexibility

27
Interviewers
  • Individual -One on One
  • Single or serial
  • Panel
  • Interviewed simultaneously by a panel/group

28
Common Interviewer Biases
  • We All have them!!!
  • Similarity
  • First Impression
  • Halo (Horns) Effect
  • Contrast (compare to another candidate)
  • Immediacy Effect (pressure to fill the job)

29
Common Interviewing Mistakes
  • Snap Judgements
  • Negative Emphasis
  • Poor Knowledge of the Job- Stereotyping
  • Pressure to Hire
  • Candidate Order- Contrast Effect
  • Nonverbal Behavior
  • Telegraphing
  • Too much/Too little talking
  • Being the DA or Psychologist

30
How to Improve the Interview
  • Restrict use of interview to KSAs interviewer can
    assess most effectively-oral communication,
    interpersonal relations
  • Increase Structure
  • Ask job related questions
  • Formal scoring format
  • Train interviewers to accurately receive and
    evaluate information

31
Combining Predictors Multiple Hurdle Approach
  • Treats each method as a screen before going
    to the next step or method
  • More economical
  • Screen In NOT a Screen Out Mentality
  • Must validate each test if adverse impact

32
Combining PredictorsCompensatory Approach
  • Applicant can compensate for a poor performance
    on one test by doing exceptionally well on
    another
  • Higher validity
  • More expensive
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com