Title: Harlow District Council
1Harlow District Council
- 2005 Budget Consultation Using SIMALTO Modelling
October - December 2004
2Todays Agenda
- Kevin Brooks
- 1 Background to the 2005/6 Budget
- 2 Consultation Methodology
- Lorna Spenceley
- 3 Results of the Consultation
- 4 What Happens Next
3Today is about being open
- to share with you the financial problems and
challenges faced by the Council - to share with you the results of our public
consultation with residents about how to meet
these challenges in next years budget
4Background to the 2005/6 Budget
5Government Inspection Report, April 2004
- Spending has increased to the point where
(Harlow) is one of the highest spending councils
in England..this is no longer sustainable. - Current resources are spread too thinly and
despite three years of trying the Council has
been unable to identify clear priorities - The failure to identify priorities and focus
resources on those priorities is a serious
failure.
6Our Recovery Plan
- The Key Recovery Projects
- Prioritisation new corporate plan and priority
led budget for 2005/6 - People Issues Management skills and capacity,
and officer/member relationships - Performance Management
7Financial Pressures
- Need to re-allocate resources in accordance with
strategic priorities rather than spread them too
thinly to the detriment of service quality - Specific budget pressures created by
- 350,000 - phased transfer of 3M (over 10
years) back to the HRA - 600,000 (at least) to close unspecified
savings budget gap inherited from previous years - 500,000 - Inflation (pay and cost increases)
- 200,000 - increased pension costs due to impact
of stock market on pension fund valuations - ? - growth needed to fund new Govt requirements
and residents priorities
8Financial Pressures Conclusion Need to Close
Budget Gap of approx 2M
- Options
- Increase Income - Council Tax already high and
likely to be capped at 5 - Use reserves - but already near minimum levels
- Reduce Expenditure - impact on services
9Reserves Now Near Minimum Levels
10Public Consultation - Delivering Our Commitments
- Joint Administrations Joint Manifesto
- July 2004 made a commitment to consult the
public on these difficult choices - Harlow Council has a history of providing many
services that are not legally required, but which
contribute to residents quality of life. In
consultation with local people we will identify
and aim to secure those services which are most
highly valued by the community.
11The Consultation Methodology
12Public Consultation Using SIMALTO Modelling
507 interviews were conducted in every ward,
proportional to its population.
13Money is short - tell us what youd spend it on?
This is only part of the grid used for the
SIMALTO exercise and is for illustrative purposes
only
14What Services Were Included
- Town Show / Bonfire
- Children /families
- Young people
- Leah Manning Centre
- Pools / leisure
- Concessionary fares
- Study centre
- Voluntary grants
- Informed
- Contact Harlow
- Car parking charges
- Town centre manage
- Shopmobility
- Recycling
- Bulky waste
- Street cleaning
- Parks / landscaping
- Pets corner
- Playhouse
- Museum
- Arts development
- Anti social behaviour
- Community partners
- Sumners centre
15Results of the Consultation
16Services which should not be reduced
- Anti social behaviour
- Recycling
- Street cleaning
- Town show / bonfire night
- Young people services
- Leah Manning Centre
- Pools / leisure centres
- Town centre management
- Shopmobility
- Parks / landscaping
- Playhouse
17Benefit Reductions Causing Least Displeasure.
- Study centre Close
- Arts development Close service
- Community partnerships Cease
- Voluntary grants Halve (or cease)
- Sumners centre Close
- Museum reduce service
- Contact Harlow Close 2 points with no
cashiering - Car parking charges Introduce to all areas
- Concessionary Travel reduce subsidy
- Pets Corner - Charge for entry
18Enhancements causing most Satisfaction
- Anti social behaviour Increase by 50
- Street cleaning Extend to broken glass
- Recycling Expand door-step collections
19Council Tax Service Benefits/Tax Level Trade
Off ChoiceAfter making their choices based on
four separate levels of spend, residents were
informed what each choice would cost in terms of
Council Tax.
20Having been informed of the cost of each of their
four choices, residents were asked which of the
four options they preferred.
Only 16 chose to reduce tax for a large net
reduction in services. However, residents opting
to pay more were of course only doing so for
their own choice of services.
21Summary Information
-
- To maintain the current levels of service,
council would have to save 2m in service
budgets. - Only 16 of residents opted for tax savings of
12/year, knowing the large amount of service
cuts this would mean. - 53 opted for at least 10/year (4.6) increased
tax to minimise service savings.
22MORI Focus Group Some Key Messages
- Council provides some services well, eg leisure,
recycling, street cleansing and community
services - Council falls down on corporate issues, eg
infighting, inability to prioritise, competence
and poor communication - Key priorities should be the image of Harlow,
reducing crime and fear of crime, regenerating
the town, sound finances, working in partnership
and improving customer services
23What Happens Next?
24What Happens Next
-
- Discussions within political groups and between
political groups seeking consensus on 2005/6
budget - 4th Feb Policy Resources debates Corporate
Plan, MTFS, and efficiency review - 10th Feb Policy Resources debates 2005/6
budget - 17th Feb Full Council debates corporate plan,
MTFS and 2005/6 budget
25And What Happens After That?
- Other Recovery Projects Gather Pace
- Unit Cost/Efficiency Reviews
- Management skills and capacities gaps
- Member/Officer relationships
- Performance Management Framework