Title: The Future of Coal Seam Gas
1The Future of Coal Seam Gas
- Future growth is potentially rapid (domestic use
and LNG exports) - Proposals for an LNG export industry on the east
coast of Australia, exporting from Gladstone - Gladstone LNG projects are unique in using gas
sourced from extensive coal deposits
2Capturing the LNG Market Opportunity
- Asia Pacific LNG demand to increase by at least
40-60 mtpa by 2017 - At least 6 new Australian LNG projects, 5 in
Queensland, are under consideration so a 60 mtpa
target is achievable (from 20 mtpa in 2008) - This would make Australia the worlds third
largest LNG producer (after Qatar and Nigeria) - Will require at least A40 billion or 5 times the
capital invested in new LNG capacity over the
past decade
3Priorities and Issues
Upstream Industry Strategy
- A government/industry partnership to ensure the
value of Australias oil and gas resources to the
Australian people is maximised, petroleum energy
security delivered and the long-term
sustainability of an Australian oil and gas
industry assured.
4Our vision and targets
- In the decade to 2017
- LNG production capacity increases from 20 Mt a
year (in 2008) to at least 50-60 Mt a year - natural gas use for industrial purposes and as a
competitive feedstock for resources processing
doubles - in a competitive electricity market, 70 of all
new electricity generation capacity installed in
Australia is gas-fired.
5What we could achieve
- This could deliver enormous benefits
- a potential quantum improvement in the balance of
trade an extra 20b a year by 2017 - lower greenhouse gas emissions 180 Mt CO2-e a
year - greater energy supply security
- increased revenue to governments billions of
dollars a year - increased employment
- increased regional development
- reduced water usage in electricity generation.
6Existing LNG Plants
Darwin LNG
NWSDP
Total Existing LNG Capacity 16.3 mtpa (0.9 Tcf)
Source ABARE
7Existing Committed LNG Plants
Darwin LNG
NWSDP
Pluto
Total Existing Committed LNG Capacity 23.6
mtpa (1.1 Tcf)
Source ABARE
8Existing, Committed Proposed LNG Plants
Darwin LNG
Sunrise
Timor Sea LNG
Prelude
Ichthys
Browse LNG
Curtis LNG
NWSDP
Wheatstone
Fishermans Landing LNG
Pluto
Gorgon
Gladstone LNG
Scarborough
Pluto II
Sun LNG
Total Existing, Committed Proposed LNG
Capacity 97.8 mtpa (4.5 Tcf) Estimated Capital
Investment 197 billion (NPV)
Source ABARE
9Challenges for Realising Australias Growth
Potential
- The future contribution of the industry will
largely be determined through a combination of
factors, including how it addresses its
challenges - rapidly declining domestic oil production
- growth in export opportunities for gas in an
increasingly competitive and dynamic global
supply market - the competitiveness of gas with other fuels and
its ability to increase its penetration in
domestic markets
10Challenges for Realising Australias Growth
Potential (cont.)
- the increased national and global focus on
climate change policy - more rigorous community expectations in relation
to safety and environmental performance - the availability of skilled labour
- the need for, and funding of, a coordinated
program of research and technology development.
11Operational Challenges
- Coal seam gas water
- Coal seam must be dehydrated to mobilise the gas
- Industry has lead the way in CSG water treatment
- Government policy does not reflect the
aspirations of industry and the community - Potential for more than 25 GL per year to be
produced - Significant benefit can be delivered to urban,
agriculture, industry and environmental use - Partnership with government to achieve a regional
solution
12Operational Challenges (cont)
- Tenure security
- Qld government legislative framework allows grant
of overlapping tenure - Overlapping exploration tenure for CSG earmarked
for proposed LNG plants - Land access
- CSG operations are new and growing rapidly
- Increased concern from landowners/occupiers about
CSG operations - First LNG facility to be constructed in a
populated area
13Operational Challenges (cont)
- Access to acreage
- Acreage release process
- Significant lag between exploration and
subsequent development decisions - Obtaining timely approvals (environmental, native
title and landowner) - Fiscal regime that
- Balances reward with risk
- Recognises the unique circumstances of the
Queensland industry
14Operational Challenges (cont)
- Enormous up front capital costs
- Increased by 40-60 per cent over the past two
years) - Infrastructure needs for gas transport and
processing, Curtis Island, shipping channel,
port, and CSG water aggregation, treatment and
distribution - Long project construction periods (up to five
years for LNG projects) - Generally low project returns
15Regulation reform
- The perception of Queensland as an investment
destination with a low level of sovereign risk
must be made a reality. - The increasing complexity of Queenslands
regulatory regime is increasing investor
uncertainty and weakening one of Australias main
competitive advantages.
16Conclusions
- Future for the industry can and should be very
positive. - A range of policy impediments must be addressed
if the industrys promise is to be realised.