CALL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

CALL

Description:

Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is often perceived, somewhat narrowly, ... were incapable of presenting authentic recordings of the human voice and easily ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: ibtisa
Category:
Tags: call | recordings

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CALL


1
EFL - 537- 06TW2 Computer Assisted Language
Learning (CALL) Instructor Lyra
Riabov Submitted by Naji Amrani,
Imane Fellman, Nathan ChihYin,Chiu Date January
12,2006
2
CALL
  • Computer
  • Assisted
  • Language
  • Learning
  • An overview

3
Imane
  • Today I will cover those points
  • A definition of CALL
  • A brief history of CALL
  • Traditional CALL
  • Explorative CALL
  • Multimedia CALL
  • Web Based CALL
  • Questions to discuss

4
Definition of CALL
  • Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is
    often perceived, somewhat narrowly, as an
    approach to language teaching and learning in
    which the computer is used as an aid to the
    presentation, reinforcement and assessment of
    material to be learned, usually including a
    substantial interactive element .

5
A brief history of CALL
  • CALL's origins can be traced back to the 1960s.
    Up until the late 1970s
  • CALL projects were confined mainly to
    universities, where computer programs were
    developed on large mainframe computers. The PLATO
    project, initiated at the University of Illinois
    in 1960, is an important landmark in the early
    development of CALL .

6
A brief history of CALL
  • In the late 1970s, the arrival of the personal
    computer (PC) brought computing within the range
    of a wider audience, resulting in a boom in the
    development of CALL programs and a flurry of
    publications. Early CALL favored an approach that
    drew heavily on practices associated with
    programmed instruction. This was reflected in the
    term Computer Assisted Language Instruction
    (CALI), which originated in the USA and was in
    common use until the early 1980s, when CALL
    became the dominant term. There was initially a
    lack of imagination and skill on the part of
    programmers, a situation that was rectified to a
    considerable extent by the publication of an
    influential seminal work by Higgins Johns
    (1984), which contained numerous examples of
    alternative approaches to CALL.

7
Traditional CALL
  • Behavioristic or traditional CALL presented a
    stimulus to which the learner had to provide a
    response.
  • In early CALL programs the stimulus was in the
    form of text presented on screen, and the only
    way in which the learner could respond was by
    entering an answer at the keyboard.

8
example
  • Adverbs

9
  • Discrete error analysis and feedback were a
    common feature of traditional CALL, and the more
    sophisticated programs would attempt to analyse
    the learner's response, pinpoint errors, and
    branch to help and remedial activities.

10
  • . An alternative approach is the use of
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to parse
    the learner's response - so-called "intelligent
    CALL" (ICALL) - but there is a gulf between those
    who favour the use of AI to develop CALL programs
    (Matthews 1994) and, at the other extreme, those
    who perceive this approach as a threat to
    humanity

11
The Explorative CALL
  • More recent approaches to CALL have favored a
    learner-centered, explorative approach rather
    than a teacher-cantered, drill-based approach to
    CALL. The explorative approach is characterized
    by the use of concordance programs in the
    languages classroom - an approach described as
    Data-Driven Learning (DLL) by Tim Johns

12
Multi media CALL
  • Early personal computers were incapable of
    presenting authentic recordings of the human
    voice and easily recognizable images
  • The result was the development of interactive
    videodiscs for language learners

13
  • The Web Enhanced Language Learning (WELL)
    project, which has been funded under the FDTL
    programme of the HEFCE, aims to promote wider
    awareness and more effective use of the Web for
    teaching modern languages across higher education
    in the UK. The WELL website provides access to
    high-quality Web resources in a number of
    different languages, selected and described by
    subject experts, plus information and examples on
    how to use them for teaching and learning

14
example
  • WELL - Web Enhanced Language Learning

15
Questions for debate
  • Do you think that the use of these technology
    will help the language learning to be more
    autonomous?

16
Internet for English Teaching
  • Resources for Teacher
  • Student Communication and Collaboration

17
Resources for Teacher
  • Professional resources
  • E-Mail Tips
  • How to search powerful engine
  • Using keyword for searching

18
Professional resources
  • Use internet for teaching
  • http//www.tesol.net/neteach.html
  • Professional Journals and Magazines
  • The Internet TESL Journal
  • http//iteslj.org/
  • http//www.eslmag.com/
  • http//alr.org
  • http//www.tesol.org/s_tesol/index.asp

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
How to search powerful engine
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Student Communication and Collaboration
  • Asking for Advice via E-Mail
  • Communication
  • Searching Reference on Class Home Page
  • Collaboration
  • Exchange Message via E-Mail
  • Discuss on Discussion Forums

26
Internet Learning Media for Student
  • http//www.nick.com/all_nick/specials/nick_cbs/
  • http//abc.net.au/children/
  • http//disney.go.com/home/today/index.html

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Questions for you to brainstorm
  • Within the limited time , how you can answer all
    your students questions via E-Mail right on time
    or have any better ideas here you can deal with
    it?
  • If you are not a IT person, what you can do if
    websites you created have a problem?

30
Technology Authenticity
  • CALL Environments Learning Environments

31
CALL the 8 Learning Conditions
3. Task Authenticity
2. Audience Authenticity
1. Opportunity
4. Creativity
5. Time Feedback
6. Guidance Toward Awareness
7. Optimal Atmosphere
8. Autonomy
Language Learning Environment
Computers Discussion Board
Internet Email
CALL
32
CALL the 8 Learning Conditions (cont.)
CALL
How Does It Affect
Audience Authenticity
Task Authenticity
Guidance Toward Awareness
Autonomy
Opportunity
Creativity
Time Feedback
Optimal Atmosphere
33
Opportunity
  • Opportunity to interact and negotiate meaning
  • CALL provides many unique opportunities
  • Students can interact in real time (Synchronous
    communication)
  • Students can reduce stress in interaction
    opportunities by communicating with a delay,
    adding time to adjust and modify interaction
    (Asynchronous communication

34
Audience Authenticity
  • Purposeful interaction with knowledgeable
    audience
  • Communities on the Internet offer information on
    many topics in many languages students have the
    opportunity to communicate with native speakers
    on topics that interest them for purposes that
    benefit them

35
Task Authenticity
  • Authentic tasks offer the same cognitive
    challenges as real-world tasks.
  • Technology, particularly the Internet, have
    become in a sense the real world
  • Students who learn to communicate in the target
    language using the Internet are not only learning
    the language, but also the most modern uses of
    the language.

36
Creativity
  • Learners should be involved in a diversity of
    tasks with a variety of inputs
  • Technology, including language learning software
    and various Internet resources provide such
    diversity in almost limitless combinations

37
Time Feedback
  • Time and feedback facilitate the formation for
    ideas in a target language
  • Language learning programs offer self-paced
    learning and instantaneous feedback
  • The Internet can be a tool for teachers and
    learners to discuss/offer feedback at
    individually pacing depending on student needs

38
Guidance Toward Awareness
  • Students should be exposed to some metacognitive
    guidance (learning strategies)
  • The Internet IS a learning strategy
  • By exposing students to Internet and other
    technology resources for language, the teacher
    demonstrates the learning process as well as
    provides tools to facilitate that process
  • Students become more aware of how they are
    learning the language and thus are more engaged
    in that learning

39
Optimal Atmosphere
  • Stress must be facilitative NOT debilitative
  • Students should have enough anxiety to be
    motivated without having so much as to be
    frustrated
  • Much language learning software is reactive to
    student input this process can facilitate an
    optimal atmosphere
  • Using Internet technologies and resources
    (discussion boards, chat rooms, etc) the teacher
    can assign tasks that create a learner centered
    environment where an optimal atmosphere can be
    achieved

40
Autonomy
  • Student are given ownership student centered
    learning
  • Technology frees the teacher to better
    individualize language instruction and make the
    learning environment more student centered

41
Conclusion CALL Authenticity
Authenticity Literacy Interaction Vitality Empower
ment
  • Technology and the Internet ARE authentic
  • These are mediums in which students, today and in
    the future, will use language
  • The Internet, particularly, offers 24-hour access
    to authentic materials, tasks, and audiences

42
Questions
  • How can teachers highlight, support and promote
    the authentic learning opportunities that the
    Internet and other technologies provide?
  • Are there any dangers in using CALL? Can you
    think of any situations in which CALL would
    hinder language learning?

43
References
  • Graham Davies, Computer assisted language
    learning retreived from http//www.lang.ltsn.ac.
    uk/resources/goodpractice.aspx?resourceid61
  • Higgins, J. Johns, T. (1984). Computers in
    Language Learning. London Collins
  • Matthews, C. (1994). Intelligent Computer
    Assisted Language Learning as Cognitive Science
    The choice of Syntactic Frameworks for Language
    Tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in
    Education 5, 4533-56

44
PLEASE DISCUSS
  • Within the limited time , how you can answer all
    your students questions via E-Mail right on time
    or have any better ideas here you can deal with
    it?
  • If you are not a IT person, what you can do if
    websites you created have a problem?
  • Do you think that the use of these technology
    will help the language learning to be more
    autonomous?
  • How can teachers highlight, support and promote
    the authentic learning opportunities that the
    Internet and other technologies provide?
  • Are there any dangers in using CALL? Can you
    think of any situations in which CALL would
    hinder language learning?

45
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com