Title: MuskwaKechika Management Area
1Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Heliportable
Drilling Feasibility Study
Randal Glaholt and Lois Pittaway TERA
Environmental Consultants
in association with Brian Churchill Chillborne
Environmental Services Harris Wheeler AAEA Ltd.
2Issues
- Regulatory/Policy
- Environmental
- Technical
- Economic
3History of Heliportable Drilling
- gt 20 years heliportable drilling
- Approximately 200 heliportable wells
- South America, Indonesia, New Guinea, New
Zealand, Wyoming, Mackenzie Delta
4Previous Heliportable Evaluations in BC
- Projects
- Industry rejection cost and safety
- Government rejection uncertainty around
environmental risk associated with blow-outs and
safety
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd. (Beattie
Peaks, 1991) - Talisman Energy (PCP Falls, 1994)
- Imperial Oil Limited (Belcourt Creek, 1995)
- Murphy Oil Company Ltd. (Sikanni, 1996)
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd. (Sikanni, 1996)
- Murphy Oil Company Ltd. (Chicken Creek, 1999)
- Ricks Nova Scotia Co. (Ladyfern, 2000)
- Marathon Canada Ltd. (Koller Creek, 2001)
5Regulatory and Policy Review
- Petroleum and Natural Gas Act
- Workers Compensation Act
- Oil and Gas Commission Act
- MK Management Area Act
- BC Maximum Disturbance Review Criteria
- No explicit exclusion of heliportable drilling
- Promote responsible development, safety,
environmental protection and socio-economic
benefit
6ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
7Impact of Roads
- long duration (2years)
- erosion, sedimentation
- habitat removal, fragmentation
- access for hunting and fishing, wildlife
- wildlife displacement
- animal-vehicle collisions
- landscape aesthetics
- weed dispersal
8Impact of Helicopters
- short duration (e.g., months)
- wildlife displacement
- noise pollution
- reduced large spill response
- reduced potential for vehicle spills
9(No Transcript)
10TECHNICAL EVALUATION
11Key Technical Issues
12Drilling Rig Availability and Capability
- Drilling rigs with 3,400 m depth capability
available in North America - Drilling rigs with 5,400 m common internationally
- Heliportable service equipment is available
13Helicopter Availability and Capability
- Drilling Rig Mobilization
- heavy lift helicopters (e.g., Chinook 234,
Sikorsky S-64)(10,000 kg capacity) - readily available
- Routine Service
- medium lift helicopters (e.g., Bell 212, A-star)
- readily available
14 Blow-outAvoidance and Control
- Low probability (e.g., 0.31,000 wells or
13,333 wells) - Proper planning
- Experienced and supervised crews
- Stockpiling supplies and BOP equipment
- Rig ignition in minutes
- Relief well typically not required
15Safety
- Many remote industrial operations without 24 hour
access - Require standard OHS risk assessment, OHS
Schedule 1 compliance - Road access not the first means of emergency
response - Require well trained, experienced and supervised
crew
16ECONOMIC EVALUATION
17Key Cost Considerations
18Major Direct Heliportable Cost Factors
- Size of rig
- Duration of drill
- Contingency stockpiling and backhauling
- Stand-by charges (relief rig, heavy equipment)
19CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
20Key Findings
- Significant environmental benefits in many cases
- Heliportable rigs and support service equipment
are available - Worker safety and sour gas well control concerns
can be managed - Heliportable drilling will tend to be more
expensive where short and/or simple access is
required
21Critical Site Factors
- Environmental Sensitivity
- Availability of Low Impact Alternatives
- Helicopter Site Risk
- Blow-out Risk and Sour Gas
22Decision Making Options
- Assess tradeoffs and alternatives
- Assess and numerically score critical factors
- Require heliportable by location
- Require heliportable by circumstance
- Company vs. government decision
23Recommendations
- Include heliportable drilling as an MK management
tool - Develop a Policy and Best Practices
- Suitability mapping
- Implement a Pilot Study
- Consider financial incentives
- Investigate feasibility of heliportable
production and operations